Intel Core i9 13900K vs Apple M2 Max

82 out of 100
Intel Core i9 13900K
VS
65 out of 100
Apple M2 Max

We compared two CPUs: the 3.0 GHz Intel Core i9 13900K (desktop) with 24-cores against the 3.5 GHz Apple M2 Max (laptop) with 12-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the DeviceFacts Score for desktop CPU.
DeviceFacts Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
🔌 Usage Scenario:

Value for money (Beta)

Global average CPU prices are used by default! For better accuracy, enter your current prices and click “Calculate".
Currency
VS

Key Differences

What are the key differences between Max and 13900K
Advantages of Intel Core i9 13900K
  • Has 12 more physical cores
  • Unlocked multiplier
  • Supports up to 192 GB DDR5-5600 RAM
  • Newer PCI Express version – 5.0
  • 9% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 2939 vs 2695 points
Advantages of Apple M2 Max
  • More powerful Apple M2 Max GPU (38-core) integrated graphics: 13.6 vs 0.8 TFLOPS
  • Around 320 GB/s (357%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
  • More modern manufacturing process – 5 versus 10 nanometers
  • Supports quad-channel memory

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
124
122
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
1896
1022
Cinebench 2026 (Single) 673 -
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) 8146 -
Cinebench Scores (35th and 148th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2939
2695
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
20498
14891
File compression 1570 MB/sec 1690 MB/sec
Clang compilation 193.2 Klines/sec 131.8 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 477 pages/sec 368.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 560.7 Mpixels/sec 382.1 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 301.8 pages/sec 272.7 pages/sec
Background blur 75.8 images/sec 54.1 images/sec
Photo processing 162.5 images/sec 149.6 images/sec
Ray tracing 43.5 Mpixels/sec 17 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 683 & 693 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
4596
4136
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
58087
26843
Integer math 206.4 GOps/sec 57.7 GOps/sec
Floating point math 150.5 GOps/sec 73.4 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 232M Primes/sec 359M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 86.9M Strings/sec 41.1M Strings/sec
Data encryption 46.2 GBytes/sec 15.7 GBytes/sec
Data compression 785.8 MBytes/sec 335.2 MBytes/sec
Physics 3101 Frames/sec 3849 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 46B Matrices/sec 14.7B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 12796 & 1034 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
529.69
253.11

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 15.2 PPW 20.4 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 164 PPW 297.8 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 464.7 PPW 536.9 PPW
Blender / Watt 4.24 PPW 5.06 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core i9 13900K
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-27 (Marcus Kuronen)Cinebench 2026645 / 7225
📘 2026-07-11 (Nagambie)Cinebench 2026673 / 8146
📘 2026-05-09 (veshelya)Cinebench 2024133 / 941
📘 2026-03-23 (Rohit007)Cinebench 2024124 / 1906
📘 2025-11-09 (LieInMyEyes)Cinebench 2024126 / 1771
Apple M2 Max
No benchmark results yet

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i9 13900K and Apple M2 Max

General

Vendor Intel Apple
Released September 27, 2022 January 17, 2023
Type Desktop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 ARMv8
Codename Raptor Lake Apple M2
Model number i9-13900K -
Integrated GPU UHD Graphics 770 Apple M2 Max GPU (38-core)
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 9 7900X -
Successor - Intel Core Ultra 9 285K - Apple M5 Max (40-сore GPU)
Intel CPU rating (#14th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 8 8
P-Threads 16 8
Base Frequency (P) 3.0 GHz 3.5 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.4 GHz -
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 16 4
E-Threads 16 4
Base Frequency (E) 2.2 GHz 2.4 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.3 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 24 12
Total Threads 32 12
Bus Frequency 100 MHz -
Multiplier 30x 35x
L1 Cache 80K (per core) 192K (per core)
L2 Cache 2MB (per core) 32MB (shared)
L3 Cache 36MB (shared) -
Unlocked Multiplier Yes No

Package

Transistors - 67 billions
Fabrication Process 10 nm 5 nm
TDP (PL1) 125 W 50 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 253 W -
Socket LGA-1700 Apple M-Socket
Peak Temperature 100°C 100°C
Desktop CPU ranking (#21st place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 770 Apple M2 Max GPU (38-core)
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 450 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1650 MHz 1398 MHz
Shading Units 256 4864
TMUs 16 304
ROPs 8 152
Execution Units 32 608
TGP 15 W 70 W
iGPU FLOPS
0.8 TFLOPS
M2 Max +1600%
13.6 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-5600
- DDR4-3200
- LPDDR5-6400
Max. Memory Size 192 GB 96 GB
Memory Channels 2 4
Max. Memory Bandwidth 89.6 GB/s 409.6 GB/s
ECC Support Yes No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core i9 13900K official page -
PCI Express Version 5.0 4.0
PCI Express Lanes 20 -

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
690 (68.3%)
320 (31.7%)
Total votes: 1010

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Apple M2 Max or Intel Core i9 13900K?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
Avatar
Guest 842 August 21, 2023 at 07:17 AM
The M2 Max is the best CPU for coding, programming, and multitasking—it's significantly superior in these areas. It can handle compiling 100 tabs of 4K YouTube videos effortlessly. However, when it comes to video games, the i9 13900k is notably better.
+27 Reply
Avatar
I don't like rubbish February 23, 2024 at 12:03 AM
Not everyone is an avid video editor, but definitely 80% love video games, and it's a fact that the M2 can't compete.
0 Reply
Avatar
Leonard WEI July 8, 2023 at 10:41 AM
The RISC CPU is not inferior to the CISC CPU in terms of performance, and it excels in power consumption compared to the latter. Additionally, we use Mac for the smooth and seamless experience it offers, allowing us to forget about battery anxiety. On the other hand, Intel and AMD make CPUs that come out of the factory as "ashes," boasting high performance but sacrificing the ancestral advantage of "overclocking" and consuming astonishing amounts of power.
+10 Reply
Avatar
Cybersecure June 17, 2023 at 09:01 PM
I just purchased a Lenovo Slim 9i, and its 13th gen i13 and much shorter distance ram travel would blow the keyboard of a MacBook Pro M2 max I would also say it is better designed and has a more premium feel. People that are so pro Mac don't understand there are laptops that best it in many ways.
+23 Reply
Avatar
like4like June 8, 2023 at 03:17 PM
This is comparing Apples and peers (pun intended). Compare a new Mac Studio with an i9-based desktop, and you know Apple is miles ahead in terms of design and 'practical' performance, not to mention power usage, cooling, and noise. Time for Intel/AMD to step up its game!
+22 Reply
Avatar
PoopdeckPappy March 26, 2023 at 10:38 AM
I wonder what the m2 could do if Apple went the performance at any cost route. "Power and heat don't matter", just make it fast!
+18 Reply
Avatar
Brandon March 23, 2023 at 07:07 PM
You have to spend like 3k+ to get an m2 max and you could build an absolute beast pc for the price of that and smash a mac.
+36 Reply
Avatar
Nugget February 20, 2023 at 08:40 AM
Already chose the 13900k and it's ripping through Premiere Pro!
+127 Reply