Intel Core i9 14900K vs Apple M5 (10-Core)

We compared two CPUs: the 3.2 GHz Intel Core i9 14900K (desktop) with 24-cores against the 4.61 GHz Apple M5 (10-Core) (laptop) with 10-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the DeviceFacts Score for desktop CPU.
DeviceFacts Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
๐Ÿ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Value for money (Beta)

Global average CPU prices are used by default! For better accuracy, enter your current prices and click โ€œCalculate".
Currency
VS

Key Differences

What are the key differences between (10-Core) and 14900K
Advantages of Intel Core i9 14900K
  • Supports up to 192 GB DDR5-5600 RAM
  • Has 14 more physical cores
  • Unlocked multiplier
Advantages of Apple M5 (10-Core)
  • More powerful Apple M5 GPU (10-core) integrated graphics: 4.1 vs 0.8 TFLOPS
  • More modern manufacturing process โ€“ 3 versus 10 nanometers
  • Newer - released 2 years later
  • Around 64 GB/s (71%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
  • 35% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 4276 vs 3171 points

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
2086
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) - 4456
Cinebench Scores (17th and 113th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
4276
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
22629
17862
File compression 1940 MB/sec 1790 MB/sec
Clang compilation 194.6 Klines/sec 138 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 589.2 pages/sec 427.3 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 638.4 Mpixels/sec 430.7 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 318.7 pages/sec 421.1 pages/sec
Background blur 71.7 images/sec 78.7 images/sec
Photo processing 191.6 images/sec 156.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 41.7 Mpixels/sec 21.6 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] โ€“ 644 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
5762
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
58245
26779
Integer math 209.3 GOps/sec 56.9 GOps/sec
Floating point math 152.1 GOps/sec 75.6 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 228M Primes/sec 301M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 86.6M Strings/sec 35.6M Strings/sec
Data encryption 46.5 GBytes/sec 17.1 GBytes/sec
Data compression 785.8 MBytes/sec 296.6 MBytes/sec
Physics 3098 Frames/sec 3199 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 44.7B Matrices/sec 15.1B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] โ€“ 13248 & 507 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
512.57
275.89

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 16.7 PPW 43.8 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 181 PPW 661.6 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 466 PPW 991.8 PPW
Blender / Watt 4.1 PPW 10.22 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core i9 14900K
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-10-06 (Devansh)Geekbench 6 CPU2993 / 18135
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-10-06 (Devansh)Geekbench 7 CPU2611 / 21934
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-10-06 (Devansh)Cinebench 2026543 / 8307
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-02-24 (Tanvir)Cinebench 2024129 / 2086
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-01-31 (Kreuz)Cinebench 2024128 / 1976
Apple M5 (10-Core)
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-07-29 -> knotp37Cinebench 20260 / 3841
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-07-05 -> maheshkondrajuGeekbench 6 CPU4224 / 17165
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-12-27 -> RennsportGeekbench 6 CPU4289 / 18011

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i9 14900K and Apple M5 (10-Core)

General

Vendor Intel Apple
Released October 16, 2023 October 15, 2025
Type Desktop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 ARMv9
Codename Raptor Lake Refresh Apple M5
Model number i9-14900K T8142
Integrated GPU UHD Graphics 770 Apple M5 GPU (10-core)
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme (X2E-96-100)
Successor - Intel Core Ultra 9 285K -
Intel CPU rating (#7th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 8 4
P-Threads 16 4
Base Frequency (P) 3.2 GHz 4.61 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 6 GHz -
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 16 6
E-Threads 16 6
Base Frequency (E) 2.4 GHz 3.0 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.4 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 24 10
Total Threads 32 10
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 32x 46x
L1 Cache 80K (per core) 192K (per core)
L2 Cache 2MB (per core) 22MB (shared)
L3 Cache 36MB (shared) -
Unlocked Multiplier Yes No

Package

Transistors - 28 billions
Fabrication Process 10 nm 3 nm
TDP (PL1) 125 W 27 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 253 W -
Socket LGA-1700 Apple M-Socket
Peak Temperature 100ยฐC 100ยฐC
Die Size - 157.48 mmยฒ
Desktop CPU ranking (#13th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 770 Apple M5 GPU (10-core)
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz -
GPU Boost Clock 1650 MHz 1620 MHz
Shading Units 256 1280
TMUs 16 80
ROPs 8 40
Execution Units 32 160
TGP 15 W -
iGPU FLOPS
0.8 TFLOPS
M5 (10-Core) +412%
4.1 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-5600
- DDR4-3200
- LPDDR5X-9600
Max. Memory Size 192 GB 32 GB
Memory Channels 2 8
Max. Memory Bandwidth 89.6 GB/s 153.6 GB/s
ECC Support Yes No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core i9 14900K official page -
PCI Express Version 5.0 -
PCI Express Lanes 20 -

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
2 (50%)
2 (50%)
Total votes: 4

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Apple M5 (10-Core) or Intel Core i9 14900K?
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!