Intel Core Ultra 5 125H vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 1.2 GHz Intel Core Ultra 5 125H with 14-cores against the 2.0 GHz AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 with 12-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
DeviceFacts Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 370 and 125H
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  • Newer PCI Express version – 5.0
  • Has 2 more physical cores
  • More than 10Β° C higher critical temperature
Advantages of AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
  • Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-5600 RAM
  • More modern manufacturing process – 4 versus 7 nanometers
  • More powerful AMD Radeon 890M integrated graphics: 5.9 vs 3.9 TFLOPS
  • 40% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 2985 vs 2136 points
  • Has 6 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • Newer - released 6 months later
  • 13% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.1 GHz vs 4.5 GHz)

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) - 475
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) - 5200
Cinebench Scores (#103rd place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1090 MB/sec 1340 MB/sec
Clang compilation 78.8 Klines/sec 139.9 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 273.9 pages/sec 335.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 321.4 Mpixels/sec 468.2 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 226.1 pages/sec 322.1 pages/sec
Background blur 42.4 images/sec 63.8 images/sec
Photo processing 103.8 images/sec 124.6 images/sec
Ray tracing 17.6 Mpixels/sec 33.5 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 823 & 3 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 67.6 GOps/sec 122.2 GOps/sec
Floating point math 49.4 GOps/sec 76.4 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 85M Primes/sec 127M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 25.9M Strings/sec 48.3M Strings/sec
Data encryption 13.5 GBytes/sec 22.1 GBytes/sec
Data compression 222.3 MBytes/sec 442.7 MBytes/sec
Physics 1359 Frames/sec 1881 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 12.9B Matrices/sec 31.4B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 2263 & 3074 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
281.07

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 25.3 PPW 23 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 359.9 PPW 295.9 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 715.9 PPW 647.4 PPW
Blender / Watt 4.9 PPW 5.21 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-07 (Dazzy G)Geekbench 6 CPU2266 / 11468
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-25 (SunrayVision)Geekbench 6 CPU2314 / 11107
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-25 (SunrayVision)Cinebench 2024103 / 763
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-05 (Fadaf)Geekbench 6 CPU2221 / 11456
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-30 (ilikememe)Geekbench 6 CPU2201 / 11410
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-26 (Nvdya)Cinebench 2024114 / 1135
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-24 (Peterr)Cinebench 2024117 / 962
πŸ“˜ 2025-03-18 (Rennsport)Geekbench 6 CPU2904 / 15532
πŸ“˜ 2025-03-18 (Asus Tuf FA608WI)Cinebench 2024104 / 1050
πŸ“˜ 2025-03-15 (Urxelix)Cinebench 2024116 / 1217

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 5 125H and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

General

Vendor Intel Amd
Released December 14, 2023 June 3, 2024
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Meteor Lake Zen 5 (Strix Point)
Model number 125H 370
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics (7-Cores) Radeon 890M
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS - Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Successor - Intel Core Ultra 5 225H - AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
Intel CPU rating (#138th place)
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (#31st place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 4 4
P-Threads 8 8
Base Frequency (P) 1.2 GHz 2.0 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 4.5 GHz 5.1 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 10 8
E-Threads 10 16
Base Frequency (E) 0.7 GHz 2.0 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 3.6 GHz 3.3 GHz
Total
Total Cores 14 12
Total Threads 18 24
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 12x 20x
L1 Cache 112K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 2MB (per core) 1MB (per core)
L3 Cache 18MB (shared) 24MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 7 nm 4 nm
TDP (PL1) 20-28 W (configurable) 15-54 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 115 W -
Socket FCBGA-2049 FP8
Peak Temperature 110Β°C 100Β°C
Laptop processors ranking (178th and 42nd place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Arc Graphics (7-Cores) AMD Radeon 890M
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 400 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2200 MHz 2900 MHz
Shading Units 896 1024
TMUs 56 64
ROPs 24 32
Execution Units 112 16
TGP 28 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
3.9 TFLOPS
5.9 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5-7467
- LPDDR5x-7467
- DDR5-5600
- DDR5-5600
- LPDDR5X-8000
Max. Memory Size 96 GB 256 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 89.6 GB/s -
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 5 125H official page AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 4.0
PCI Express Lanes 28 16

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
2 (22.2%)
7 (77.8%)
Total votes: 9

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 or Intel Core Ultra 5 125H?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!