Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3.9 GHz Intel Core Ultra 7 265K with 20-cores against the 3.7 GHz AMD Ryzen 9 5900X with 12-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the DeviceFacts Score for desktop CPU.
DeviceFacts Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Value for money (Beta)

Global average CPU prices are used by default! For better accuracy, enter your current prices and click β€œCalculate".
Currency
VS
100.2
(Excellent)
Value Index
54.4
(Average)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 5900X and 265K
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
  • Newer - released 4 years and 1 month later
  • More modern manufacturing process – 3 versus 7 nanometers
  • Around 54.72 GB/s (115%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
  • Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-6400 RAM
  • Has 8 more physical cores
  • 40% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 3157 vs 2263 points
  • Newer PCI Express version – 5.0
  • More than 15Β° C higher critical temperature
  • Includes an integrated GPU Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores)
  • 13% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.4 GHz vs 4.8 GHz)
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
  • Has 34 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench Scores (24th and 112th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
21377
File compression 1580 MB/sec 1170 MB/sec
Clang compilation 201.1 Klines/sec 126 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 475.1 pages/sec 217.8 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 615.6 Mpixels/sec 362 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 350.8 pages/sec 232 pages/sec
Background blur 76.9 images/sec 38.7 images/sec
Photo processing 167.2 images/sec 85.1 images/sec
Ray tracing 42.2 Mpixels/sec 31.5 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 441 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
58591
Integer math 143.2 GOps/sec 139.7 GOps/sec
Floating point math 189.6 GOps/sec 77.6 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 492M Primes/sec 257M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 79.7M Strings/sec 51.5M Strings/sec
Data encryption 48.2 GBytes/sec 31 GBytes/sec
Data compression 665.6 MBytes/sec 498.8 MBytes/sec
Physics 3730 Frames/sec 1984 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 54.3B Matrices/sec 33.1B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 8205 & 27058 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
464.73
316.84

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 16.1 PPW 11.4 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 171 PPW 121 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 468.7 PPW 370.4 PPW
Blender / Watt 3.72 PPW 3.02 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-08 (HongKonger)Cinebench 2024140 / 1994
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-03 (HYUNKYU)Cinebench 2024137 / 1829
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-01 (Omi)Cinebench 2024138 / 1993
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-29 (Kolli)Cinebench 2024137 / 2012
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-06 (HJH)Cinebench 2024138 / 2020
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-19 (D)Cinebench 202467 / 893
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-02 (Zoli)Cinebench 202493 / 1254
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-12 (Otamatone)Cinebench 202492 / 981
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-08 (aref)Cinebench 202494 / 1015
πŸ“˜ 2025-08-15 (SnakeyB)Cinebench 2024120 / 380

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

General

Vendor Intel Amd
Released October 11, 2024 October 8, 2020
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Arrow Lake Zen 3 (Vermeer)
Model number 265K -
Integrated GPU Arc iGPU (4-Cores) No
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 7 9700X - Intel Core i9 11900K
Successor - Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus - AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
Intel CPU rating (#8th place)
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (#70th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 8 12
P-Threads 8 24
Base Frequency (P) 3.9 GHz 3.7 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.4 GHz 4.8 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 12 -
E-Threads 12 -
Base Frequency (E) 3.3 GHz -
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.6 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 20 12
Total Threads 20 24
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 39x 37x
L1 Cache 112K (per core) 64K (per core)
L2 Cache 3MB (per core) 512K (per core)
L3 Cache 30MB (shared) 64MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier Yes Yes

Package

Transistors - 4.15 billions
Fabrication Process 3 nm 7 nm
TDP (PL1) 125 W 105 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 250 W 142 W
Socket FCLGA-1851 AM4
Peak Temperature 105Β°C 90Β°C
Desktop CPU ranking (14th and 83rd place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores) -
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz -
GPU Boost Clock 2000 MHz -
Shading Units 512 -
TMUs 32 -
ROPs 16 -
Execution Units 64 -
TGP 14 W -
iGPU FLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-6400 - DDR4-3200
Max. Memory Size 256 GB 128 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 102.4 GB/s 47.68 GB/s
ECC Support Yes Yes

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 7 265K official page AMD Ryzen 9 5900X official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 4.0
PCI Express Lanes 24 20

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
1 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: 1

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X or Intel Core Ultra 7 265K?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!