Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs i9 14900K
69
out of 100
VS
80
out of 100
We compared two CPUs: the 2.9 GHz Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (laptop) with 16-cores against the 3.2 GHz i9 14900K (desktop) with 24-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
Review
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the DeviceFacts Score for desktop CPU.
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
Value for money (Beta)
Key Differences
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
- More powerful Arc Graphics 140T integrated graphics: 4.8 vs 0.8 TFLOPS
- More modern manufacturing process β 3 versus 10 nanometers
- Newer - released 1 year and 2 months later
- More than 10Β° C higher critical temperature
Advantages of Intel Core i9 14900K
- Unlocked multiplier
- Has 8 more physical cores
- Has 12 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
- Supports up to 192 GB DDR5-5600 RAM
- 11% higher Turbo Boost frequency (6 GHz vs 5.4 GHz)
- 9% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 3171 vs 2897 points
Test in Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasksCinebench
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
| Cinebench 2026 (Single) | 506 | - |
| Cinebench 2026 (Multi) | 4879 | - |
Cinebench Scores (123rd and 17th place)
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
| File compression | 1510 MB/sec | 1940 MB/sec |
| Clang compilation | 129.7 Klines/sec | 194.6 Klines/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 425.7 pages/sec | 589.2 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 522.7 Mpixels/sec | 638.4 Mpixels/sec |
| Text processing | 309.2 pages/sec | 318.7 pages/sec |
| Background blur | 73.9 images/sec | 71.7 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 159.5 images/sec | 191.6 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 26.8 Mpixels/sec | 41.7 Mpixels/sec |
PassMark
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
| Integer math | 86 GOps/sec | 209.3 GOps/sec |
| Floating point math | 109.3 GOps/sec | 152.1 GOps/sec |
| Find prime numbers | 330M Primes/sec | 228M Primes/sec |
| Random string sorting | 41M Strings/sec | 86.6M Strings/sec |
| Data encryption | 26.2 GBytes/sec | 46.5 GBytes/sec |
| Data compression | 336.1 MBytes/sec | 785.8 MBytes/sec |
| Physics | 2512 Frames/sec | 3098 Frames/sec |
| Extended instructions | 26.8B Matrices/sec | 44.7B Matrices/sec |
Blender
Blender CPU
Performance Per Watt
| Cinebench 2024 / Watt | 24.9 PPW | 16.7 PPW |
| Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt | 381.6 PPW | 181 PPW |
| Passmark CPU Mark / Watt | 759.8 PPW | 466 PPW |
| Blender / Watt | 4.56 PPW | 4.1 PPW |
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.
Recent User Tests
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-01-16 (AsNapur) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2756 / 16837 |
| π 2026-01-16 (AsNapur) | Cinebench 2024 | 122 / 1126 |
| π 2025-10-31 (Adi) | Cinebench 2024 | 114 / 804 |
| π 2025-09-19 (JacoIsHere) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2868 / 14847 |
| π 2025-08-07 (Himmanshu Chowdhury) | Cinebench 2024 | 117 / 1122 |
Intel Core i9 14900K
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-10-06 (Devansh) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2993 / 18135 |
| π 2026-10-06 (Devansh) | Geekbench 7 CPU | 2611 / 21934 |
| π 2026-10-06 (Devansh) | Cinebench 2026 | 543 / 8307 |
| π 2026-02-24 (Tanvir) | Cinebench 2024 | 129 / 2086 |
| π 2026-01-31 (Kreuz) | Cinebench 2024 | 128 / 1976 |
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 9 285H and i9 14900KGeneral
| Vendor | Intel | Intel |
| Released | January 6, 2025 | October 16, 2023 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Instruction Set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake | Raptor Lake Refresh |
| Model number | 285H | i9-14900K |
| Integrated GPU | Arc Graphics 140T | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Rival Equivalent | - AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | - AMD Ryzen 9 7900X |
| Successor | - | - Intel Core Ultra 9 285K |
Intel CPU rating (46th and 7th place)
CPU
| P-Cores | 6 | 8 |
| P-Threads | 6 | 16 |
| Base Frequency (P) | 2.9 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency (P) | 5.4 GHz | 6 GHz |
| E-Cores | 10 | 16 |
| E-Threads | 10 | 16 |
| Base Frequency (E) | 2.7 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency (E) | 4.5 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Total Cores | 16 | 24 |
| Total Threads | 16 | 32 |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 29x | 32x |
| L1 Cache | 112K (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 2MB (per core) | 2MB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 24MB (shared) | 36MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | Yes |
Package
| Fabrication Process | 3 nm | 10 nm |
| TDP (PL1) | 35-45 W (configurable) | 125 W |
| Max. Boost TDP (PL2) | 115 W | 253 W |
| Socket | FCBGA-2049 | LGA-1700 |
| Peak Temperature | 110Β°C | 100Β°C |
Laptop processors ranking (#58th place)
Desktop CPU ranking (#13th place)
iGPU
| Integrated Graphics | Arc Graphics 140T | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| GPU Base Clock | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| GPU Boost Clock | 2350 MHz | 1650 MHz |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 256 |
| TMUs | 64 | 16 |
| ROPs | 32 | 8 |
| Execution Units | 8 | 32 |
| TGP | 35 W | 15 W |
iGPU FLOPS
More info: UHD Graphics 770 compared to Arc 140T
Memory Support
| Memory Types | - LPDDR5-8400 - LPDDR5x-8400 - DDR5-6400 |
- DDR5-5600 - DDR4-3200 |
| Max. Memory Size | 128 GB | 192 GB |
| Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | - | 89.6 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
Misc
| Official Site | Intel Core Ultra 9 285H official page | Intel Core i9 14900K official page |
| PCI Express Version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 28 | 20 |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 2