Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-64-100) vs Intel Core i9 13900H

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 3.4 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-64-100) with 10-cores against the 2.6 GHz Intel Core i9 13900H with 14-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
DeviceFacts Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 13900H and (X1P-64-100)
Advantages of Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-64-100)
  • More modern manufacturing process – 4 versus 10 nanometers
  • More powerful Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 integrated graphics: 3.7 vs 2.3 TFLOPS
  • Newer - released 1 year and 4 months later
Advantages of Intel Core i9 13900H
  • Has 18 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • Supports up to 96 GB DDR5-5200 RAM
  • Has 4 more physical cores
  • Newer PCI Express version – 5.0
  • 11% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 2676 vs 2412 points

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) - 614
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) - 4378
Cinebench Scores (#193rd place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1090 MB/sec 1320 MB/sec
Clang compilation 119.5 Klines/sec 107.9 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 337.1 pages/sec 372.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 376.7 Mpixels/sec 426.6 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 227 pages/sec 270.4 pages/sec
Background blur 58.2 images/sec 59.2 images/sec
Photo processing 112.1 images/sec 135.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 19.9 Mpixels/sec 24.7 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 897 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 53.6 GOps/sec 95.4 GOps/sec
Floating point math 81.3 GOps/sec 68.3 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 266M Primes/sec 102M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 30.9M Strings/sec 35M Strings/sec
Data encryption 13.1 GBytes/sec 18.6 GBytes/sec
Data compression 210.7 MBytes/sec 320.1 MBytes/sec
Physics 1789 Frames/sec 1695 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 14.5B Matrices/sec 19B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 181 & 4377 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 24.4 PPW 16.1 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 380.1 PPW 327.5 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 611.4 PPW 602 PPW
Blender / Watt 6.31 PPW 4.72 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-64-100)
No benchmark results yet
Intel Core i9 13900H
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-12 -> sevensraysCinebench 2026614 / 4378
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-12 -> sevensraysGeekbench 6 CPU2382 / 13356
πŸ“˜ 2025-06-24 (JoseBedo)Cinebench 2024113 / 723

Specifications

Full technical specification of Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-64-100) and Intel Core i9 13900H

General

Vendor Qualcomm Intel
Released April 24, 2024 January 3, 2023
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set ARMv9 x86-64
Codename Snapdragon X Raptor Lake
Model number X1P-64-100 i9-13900H
Integrated GPU Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU)
Rival Equivalent - Apple M3 - AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
Successor - - Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Intel CPU rating (#95th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 10 6
P-Threads 10 12
Base Frequency (P) 3.4 GHz 2.6 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) - 5.4 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores - 8
E-Threads - 8
Base Frequency (E) - 1.9 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) - 4.1 GHz
Total
Total Cores 10 14
Total Threads 10 20
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 34x 26x
L1 Cache 288K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 12MB (shared) 2MB (per core)
L3 Cache 6MB (shared) 24MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 4 nm 10 nm
TDP (PL1) 35 W 35-45 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 45 W 115 W
Socket Custom BGA-1744
Peak Temperature - 100Β°C
Die Size 172.7 mmΒ² -
Laptop processors ranking (112th and 123rd place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 Intel Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU)
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1250 MHz 1500 MHz
Shading Units 1536 768
TMUs 96 48
ROPs 48 24
Execution Units 6 96
TGP 30 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
3.7-4.6 TFLOPS
2.3 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5X-8448 - DDR5-5200
- DDR4-3200
- LPDDR5-6400
- LPDDR5x-6400
- LPDDR4x-4267
Max. Memory Size 64 GB 96 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 135.2 GB/s -
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-64-100) official page Intel Core i9 13900H official page
PCI Express Version 4.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 12 28

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
7 (53.8%)
6 (46.2%)
Total votes: 13

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core i9 13900H or Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-64-100)?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!