Apple M2 Pro GPU (19-core) vs A18 Pro GPU

We compared two integrated laptop graphics cards: the Apple M2 Pro GPU (19-core) with 304 pipelines and 2432 shaders against the 1 year and 8 months newer A18 Pro GPU that utilizes 128 pipelines and 768 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
DeviceFacts Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of A18 Pro GPU over M2 Pro GPU (19-core)
Reasons to consider the Apple M2 Pro GPU (19-core)
  • Performs significantly better (up to 2.9x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 3x higher maximum theoretical performance (6.8 vs 2.3 TFLOPS)
  • Has 3.2x more shading units (2432 vs 768)
  • Achieves 58% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (49K vs 31K)
Reasons to consider the Apple A18 Pro GPU
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Solar Bay 16218 7365
Wild Life Extreme 12726 3949
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 GPU Compute

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 89.7 img/sec 57.1 img/sec
Face Detection 58 img/sec 91.4 img/sec
Horizon Detection 1.94 Gpixels/sec 0.92 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 3.26 Gpixels/sec 1.21 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 2.19 Gpixels/sec 1.5 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.55 Gpixels/sec 0.45 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 163 Gpixels/sec 84.2 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 6139.2 FPS 3061 FPS
API OpenCL Metal
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9] – 207 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Apple M2 Pro GPU (19-core)
No benchmark results yet
Apple A18 Pro GPU
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-03 -> RennsportGeekbench 7 OpenCL18863
📘 2026-04-24 -> RennsportGeekbench 6 OpenCL19670

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 5279 3264
Image Segmentation (HP) 8089 4550
Image Super Resolution (Q) 15007 6705
Face Detection (HP) 19212 11770
Pose Estimation (Q) 44046 15548
Text Classification (SP) 2280 3678
Machine Translation (HP) 1972 5678
Object Detection (SP) 4941 3360
Depth Estimation (Q) 22209 13468
Style Transfer (SP) 79898 31541
Framework Core ML Core ML
Backend GPU GPU
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Apple M2 Pro GPU (19-core) and A18 Pro GPU

General

Vendor Apple Apple
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 17, 2023 September 9, 2024
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Professional Generic
Segment High-end Mid-range
Architecture Apple M GPU Apple M GPU
GPU Codename - Custom
Rival Equivalent - GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop -
Successor - Apple M5 Pro GPU (20-core) -
Recommended CPU - Apple M2 Pro or above - Apple A18 Pro (MacBook) or above
Used in CPUs - Apple M2 Pro - Apple A18 Pro (MacBook)
Laptop GPU ranking (70th and 83rd place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 450 MHz -
Boost Clock 1398 MHz 1490 MHz
Shading Units 2432 768
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 152 40
Render Output Units (ROPs) 76 -
Compute Units (Pipelines) 304 128
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 106 GPixel/s -
Texture Fill Rate 212 GTexel/s 60 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
6.8 TFLOPS
2.3 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface Custom Custom
TGP 35 W -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 5 nm 3 nm
Transistor Count 26 billion -
Max. Temperature 94°C -

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
Memory Clock 6400 MHz 7500 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 12800 Mbps -
Bus 256-bit 128-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth

API

Ray Tracing No Yes
DLSS No No

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!