GeForce RTX 3050 vs Apple M3 GPU (10-core)

We performed a head-to-head comparison of the GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB with 20 pipelines and 2560 shaders against the 1 year and 9 months newer Apple M3 GPU (10-core) that utilizes 160 pipelines and 1280 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
DeviceFacts Final Score
Overall video card score
The "Energy Efficiency" metric has less impact on the DeviceFacts Score for desktop GPU.

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of M3 GPU (10-core) over RTX 3050
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 3050
  • Performs significantly better (up to 82%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 2.6x higher maximum theoretical performance (9.1 vs 3.5 TFLOPS)
  • Includes 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory
  • Has 2.2x higher memory bandwidth: 224 vs 102.4 GB/s
  • Achieves 2.2x more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (67K vs 30K)
  • Supports Nvidia DLSS 2 technology
  • Has 2x more shading units (2560 vs 1280)
Reasons to consider the Apple M3 GPU (10-core)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
92
53
43
26
-
The Witcher 3
90
70
49
24
-
Counter-Strike 2
139
101
72
31
-
Far Cry 6
76
66
49
25
-
Hogwarts Legacy
49
38
30
13
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
59
49
35
22
-
Ghost of Tsushima
46
35
28
15
-
Cyberpunk 2077
48
45
26
11
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
80
73
49
25
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 75 -
1080p Ultra 59 -
1440p Ultra 42 -
4K Ultra 21 -
Margin of Error Low High

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
RTX 3050 +82%
6348
Time Spy 6235 -
Solar Bay 30191 13531
Port Royal 3546 -
Fire Strike 15967 -
Wild Life Extreme 12795 8237
Night Raid 74854 -
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
RTX 3050 +123%
67028
Background Blur 110.4 img/sec 60.3 img/sec
Face Detection 64.4 img/sec 40.8 img/sec
Horizon Detection 2.87 Gpixels/sec 1.21 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 3.76 Gpixels/sec 1.64 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 2.89 Gpixels/sec 1.2 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.81 Gpixels/sec 0.37 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 270.9 Gpixels/sec 102.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 9339.7 FPS 3293.3 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 916 -
DirectX 11 90 FPS -
DirectX 12 59 FPS -
GPU Compute 6415 Ops/s -
Sources: PassMark [5] – 9379 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
RTX 3050 +844%
1462.18
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 1092 & 309 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
GeForce RTX 3050
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-04-21 -> DmitryDmitryCinebench 20244722
📘 2026-04-21 -> DmitryDmitrySteel Nomad Light6237
Apple M3 GPU (10-core)
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2025-04-24 (Alex)Geekbench 6 OpenCL31004

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
RTX 3050 +188%
11848
GB6 ML Half Precision
RTX 3050 +206%
21368
GB6 ML Quantized
RTX 3050 +40%
7905
Image Classification (SP) 4958 1579
Image Segmentation (HP) 12747 2944
Image Super Resolution (Q) 9816 4425
Face Detection (HP) 22467 6661
Pose Estimation (Q) 41362 15020
Text Classification (SP) 2563 2984
Machine Translation (HP) 3721 5876
Object Detection (SP) 5929 1826
Depth Estimation (Q) 18361 9339
Style Transfer (SP) 84665 22291
Framework ONNX Core ML
Backend DirectML CPU
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]
Results were compared using different ML frameworks

Specifications

Technical specifications of GeForce RTX 3050 and Apple M3 GPU (10-core)

General

Vendor Nvidia Apple
Build Discrete Integrated
Released January 27, 2022 October 31, 2023
Launch price (MSRP) $249 -
Case Desktop Laptop
Purpose Gaming Professional
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture Ampere Apple M GPU
GPU Codename GA106 -
Rival Equivalent - - GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop
Successor - - Apple M5 GPU (10-Core)
Recommended CPU - Intel Core i5 12400 or above - Apple M3 or above
Used in CPUs - - Apple M3
Desktop GPU rating (#71st place)
Laptop GPU ranking (#81st place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 1552 MHz 500 MHz
Boost Clock 1777 MHz 1380 MHz
Shading Units 2560 1280
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 80 80
Render Output Units (ROPs) 32 40
Compute Units (Pipelines) 20 160
Tensor Cores 80 -
Ray-tracing Cores 20 -
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster -
L2 Cache 2MB shared -
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 57 GPixel/s 55 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 142 GTexel/s 110 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
RTX 3050 +160%
9.1 TFLOPS
3.5 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 Custom
TGP 130 W 15 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC
Fabrication Process 8 nm 3 nm
Die Size 276 mm² -
Transistor Count 12 billion 13.8 billion
Transistor Density 43.48 MTr/mm² -
Max. Temperature - 100°C

Memory

Memory Type GDDR6 System Shared
Memory Size 8 GB -
Memory Clock 1750 MHz 6400 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 14000 Mbps 12800 Mbps
Bus 128-bit 128-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth
RTX 3050 +119%
224 GB/s
102.4 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 -
Vulkan 1.3 -
OpenGL 4.6 -
OpenCL 3.0 -
CUDA 8.6 -
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS DLSS 2 No
DisplayPort 1.4a -

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
9 (69.2%)
4 (30.8%)
Total votes: 13

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!