GeForce RTX 4080 vs RTX 4070
VS
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080
AD103
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070
AD104
We compared two discrete desktop gaming GPUs: the GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB with 76 pipelines and 9728 shaders against the 6 months newer RTX RTX 4070 12 GB that utilizes 46 pipelines and 5888 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.
Review
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
DeviceFacts Final Score
Overall video card score
Value for money (Beta)
Key differences
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 4080
- Performs significantly better (up to 67%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
- 67% higher maximum theoretical performance (48.7 vs 29.1 TFLOPS)
- Shows 40% higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 148 vs 106 FPS
- Includes 4 GB more video memory
- Features 120 more tensor cores for effective ML and AI workloads
- Has 42% higher memory bandwidth: 716.8 vs 504 GB/s
- Achieves 30% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (217K vs 167K)
- Has 65% more shading units (9728 vs 5888)
Gaming Performance
Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutionsGames
| Forza Horizon 5 | 229 170 154 120 |
172 115 102 79 |
| The Witcher 3 | 245 210 157 81 |
194 159 114 61 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 306 220 168 85 |
272 205 149 81 |
| Far Cry 6 | 181 163 143 88 |
149 133 115 68 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 162 136 109 59 |
117 97 77 39 |
| CoD: Modern Warfare III | 217 213 167 111 |
149 145 107 69 |
| Ghost of Tsushima | 148 126 109 69 |
106 88 72 43 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 192 177 119 54 |
129 119 75 37 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 290 265 204 107 |
211 190 145 80 |
| 1080p High | 219 | 167 |
| 1080p Ultra | 187 | 139 |
| 1440p Ultra | 148 | 106 |
| 4K Ultra | 86 | 62 |
| Margin of Error | Low | Low |
Benchmarks
Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps3D Mark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
| Time Spy | 28155 | 17799 |
| Solar Bay | 136995 | 82861 |
| Port Royal | 17984 | 11156 |
| Fire Strike | 64637 | 44067 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 59123 | 35472 |
| Night Raid | 185072 | 153385 |
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
GB6 Compute Score
| Background Blur | 250.4 img/sec | 233 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 190 img/sec | 141.7 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 9.56 Gpixels/sec | 6.62 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 12.8 Gpixels/sec | 9.19 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 15.3 Gpixels/sec | 9.2 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.97 Gpixels/sec | 1.78 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 1130 Gpixels/sec | 845.4 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 28795.5 FPS | 25043.9 FPS |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
Cinebench 2024 GPU
Cinebench 2024 GPU
Passmark Graphics
G3D Mark Score
| G2D Mark | 1251 | 1165 |
| DirectX 11 | 313 FPS | 243 FPS |
| DirectX 12 | 133 FPS | 103 FPS |
| GPU Compute | 20303 Ops/s | 14561 Ops/s |
Blender
Blender GPU
Recent User Tests
GeForce RTX 4080
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2025-05-02 (Rennsport) | Geekbench 6 OpenCL | 267332 |
GeForce RTX 4070
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2025-12-14 (kashitsu) | Cinebench 2024 | 18051 |
Artificial Intelligence Tests
Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasksGeekBench 6 ML
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
| Image Classification (SP) | 13466 | 10246 |
| Image Segmentation (HP) | 34767 | 26153 |
| Image Super Resolution (Q) | 42687 | 32054 |
| Face Detection (HP) | 70927 | 51337 |
| Pose Estimation (Q) | 239350 | 124617 |
| Text Classification (SP) | 3606 | 3703 |
| Machine Translation (HP) | 6519 | 5484 |
| Object Detection (SP) | 18153 | 13134 |
| Depth Estimation (Q) | 65667 | 50548 |
| Style Transfer (SP) | 414848 | 263477 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
Specifications
Technical specifications of GeForce RTX 4080 and RTX 4070General
| Vendor | Nvidia | Nvidia |
| Build | Discrete | Discrete |
| Released | September 20, 2022 | April 13, 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1199 | $599 |
| Case | Desktop | Desktop |
| Purpose | Gaming | Gaming |
| Segment | High-end | Mid-range |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| GPU Codename | AD103 | AD104 |
| Rival Equivalent | - Radeon RX 7900 XTX | - Radeon RX 7900 XT |
| Successor | - GeForce RTX 5080 | - GeForce RTX 5070 |
| Recommended CPU | - Intel Core i7 14700K or above | - Intel Core i7 14700K or above |
Desktop GPU rating (10th and 30th place)
Graphics Processing Unit
| Base Clock | 2205 MHz | 1920 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 2505 MHz | 2475 MHz |
| Shading Units | 9728 | 5888 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) | 304 | 184 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs) | 112 | 64 |
| Compute Units (Pipelines) | 76 | 46 |
| Tensor Cores | 304 | 184 |
| Ray-tracing Cores | 76 | 46 |
| L1 Cache | 128KB per cluster | 128KB per cluster |
| L2 Cache | 64MB shared | 36MB shared |
| Instructions Per Cycle | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Raw Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 281 GPixel/s | 158 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 762 GTexel/s | 455 GTexel/s |
FLOPS (FP32)
Physical
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| TGP | 320 W | 200 W |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Fabrication Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Die Size | 379 mm² | 294 mm² |
| Transistor Count | 45 billion | 35 billion |
| Transistor Density | 118.73 MTr/mm² | 119.05 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |
| Memory Size | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Clock | 1400 MHz | 1313 MHz |
| Effective Memory Speed | 22400 Mbps | 21000 Mbps |
| Bus | 256-bit | 192-bit |
| ECC | No | No |
Memory Bandwidth
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| CUDA | 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | DLSS 3 | DLSS 3 |
| DisplayPort | 1.4a | 1.4a |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 25