AMD Radeon 610M vs Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU)

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 610M with 2 pipelines and 128 shaders against the 2 years and 2 months older Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU) that utilizes 48 pipelines and 384 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
DeviceFacts Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU) over Radeon 610M
Reasons to consider the Radeon 610M
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 6 nm process technology
  • Ray-tracing support with 2 dedicated RT cores
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU)
  • Performs better (up to 25%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 83% higher maximum theoretical performance (1.1 vs 0.6 TFLOPS)
  • Achieves 61% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (8K vs 5K)
  • Has 3x more shading units (384 vs 128)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
11
-
-
-
12
-
-
-
The Witcher 3 -
-
-
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
16
11
-
-
13
9
-
-
Far Cry 6
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
13
11
9
-
-
-
-
-
Ghost of Tsushima
-
-
-
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
-
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 9 -
1080p Ultra - -
1440p Ultra - -
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 519 741
Solar Bay 2068 -
Port Royal 291 -
Fire Strike 1745 2345
Wild Life Extreme 998 1606
Night Raid 7335 10085
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 12 img/sec 18.4 img/sec
Face Detection 6.42 img/sec 10.7 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.3 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.47 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.3 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.1 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 18.2 Gpixels/sec 21.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 828.6 FPS 1269.5 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 535 -
DirectX 11 17 FPS -
DirectX 12 7 FPS -
GPU Compute 768 Ops/s -
Sources: PassMark [5] – 194 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9] – 47 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Radeon 610M
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-05-05 (StarSophia)Steel Nomad Light614
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU)
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 660 893
Image Segmentation (HP) 627 1369
Image Super Resolution (Q) 2053 1052
Face Detection (HP) 2153 2087
Pose Estimation (Q) 5787 3981
Text Classification (SP) 713 807
Machine Translation (HP) 1114 895
Object Detection (SP) 709 944
Depth Estimation (Q) 3233 2678
Style Transfer (SP) 11091 13752
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 610M and Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU)

General

Vendor Amd Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released October 1, 2022 August 15, 2020
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 2.0 Generation 12.1
GPU Codename Mendocino Tiger Lake GT2
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen 5 7520U or above -
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
- AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
- AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
- AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
- and 6 more
- Intel Core 5 210H
- Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX
- Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX
- Intel Processor U300
- Intel Core i5 13420H
- Intel Core i5 12450H
- Intel Core i3 1125G4
- Intel Pentium Gold 7505
- and 1 more
Laptop GPU ranking (126th and 131st place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 400 MHz 400 MHz
Boost Clock 1900-2200 MHz (configurable) 800-1400 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 128 384
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 8 24
Render Output Units (ROPs) 4 12
Compute Units (Pipelines) 2 48
Tensor Cores - No
Ray-tracing Cores 2 No
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster -
L2 Cache 2MB shared -
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 8-9 GPixel/s 10-17 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 15-18 GTexel/s 19-34 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
0.5-0.6 TFLOPS
0.6-1.1 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 Ring Bus
TGP 15 W 15 W
Manufacturing TSMC Intel
Fabrication Process 6 nm 10 nm
Die Size 122 mm² 146 mm²
Transistor Count 3.4 billion -
Transistor Density 27.87 MTr/mm² -

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
Memory Size - System RAM Dependent
Memory Clock - System RAM Dependent
Effective Memory Speed - System RAM Dependent
ECC No No

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.0 2.1
Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS No No

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
0 (0%)
3 (100%)
Total votes: 3

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!