AMD Radeon 680M vs Apple M2 GPU (8-core)

We compared two integrated laptop graphics cards: the Radeon 680M with 12 pipelines and 768 shaders against the 5 months newer Apple M2 GPU (8-core) that utilizes 128 pipelines and 1024 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
DeviceFacts Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of M2 GPU (8-core) over Radeon 680M
Reasons to consider the Radeon 680M
  • 28% higher maximum theoretical performance (3.7 vs 2.9 TFLOPS)
Reasons to consider the Apple M2 GPU (8-core)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 5 nm process technology
  • Has 33% more shading units (1024 vs 768)

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 2327 -
Solar Bay 9712 7316
Port Royal 1008 -
Fire Strike 6903 -
Wild Life Extreme 4163 5676
Night Raid 27534 -
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
28675
29705
Background Blur 73.8 img/sec 58.7 img/sec
Face Detection 30.1 img/sec 35.2 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.93 Gpixels/sec 1.1 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 1.17 Gpixels/sec 1.82 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 1.17 Gpixels/sec 1.2 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.37 Gpixels/sec 0.37 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 105 Gpixels/sec 96 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 4640 FPS 3825.9 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 723 -
DirectX 11 40 FPS -
DirectX 12 21 FPS -
GPU Compute 2006 Ops/s -
Sources: PassMark [5] – 176 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
238.39
301.37
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 12 & 83 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Radeon 680M
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2025-12-08 (Wahyu)Geekbench 6 OpenCL26880
Apple M2 GPU (8-core)
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
8202
GB6 ML Quantized
6515
Image Classification (SP) 1976 3242
Image Segmentation (HP) 3138 4890
Image Super Resolution (Q) 6693 7149
Face Detection (HP) 7213 10340
Pose Estimation (Q) 21849 21268
Text Classification (SP) 1497 2268
Machine Translation (HP) 2579 1122
Object Detection (SP) 2154 3007
Depth Estimation (Q) 9635 13941
Style Transfer (SP) 56269 35943
Framework ONNX Core ML
Backend DirectML GPU
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]
Results were compared using different ML frameworks

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 680M and Apple M2 GPU (8-core)

General

Vendor Amd Apple
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 1, 2022 June 6, 2022
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Professional
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 2.0 Apple M GPU
GPU Codename Rembrandt -
Rival Equivalent - Radeon RX Vega 8 -
Successor - Radeon 8050S - Apple M5 GPU (10-Core)
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen 7 6800H or above - Apple M2 or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen 7 170
- AMD Ryzen 7 7735U
- AMD Ryzen 7 7736U
- AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
- AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 6850U
- AMD Ryzen 7 6800U​
- AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
- AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
- and 2 more
- Apple M2
Laptop GPU ranking (104th and 90th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 400 MHz 500 MHz
Boost Clock 2200-2400 MHz (configurable) 1398 MHz
Shading Units 768 1024
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 48 64
Render Output Units (ROPs) 32 32
Compute Units (Pipelines) 12 128
Ray-tracing Cores 12 -
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster -
L2 Cache 2MB shared -
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 70-77 GPixel/s 45 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 106-115 GTexel/s 89 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
3.4-3.7 TFLOPS
2.9 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 Custom
TGP 15 W 15 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 6 nm 5 nm
Die Size 208 mm² -
Transistor Count 13.1 billion 11.6 billion
Transistor Density 62.98 MTr/mm² -
Max. Temperature - 94°C

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
Memory Clock - 6400 MHz
Effective Memory Speed - 12800 Mbps
Bus - 128-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth
102.4 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 -
Vulkan 1.2 -
OpenGL 4.6 -
OpenCL 2.0 -
Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS No No

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
3 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: 3

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!