Nothing Phone (3a) vs Google Pixel 8a

66 out of 100
Nothing Phone (3a)
VS
66 out of 100
Google Pixel 8a

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.77-inch Nothing Phone (3a) (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3) that was released on March 4, 2025, against the Google Pixel 8a, which is powered by Google Tensor G3 and came out 10 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Nothing Phone (3a)
  • Has a 0.67 inch larger screen size
  • Shows 27% longer battery life (25:03 vs 19:43 hours)
  • The rear camera has a 2x optical zoom
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (50W versus 18W)
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • Thinner bezels – 6.4% more screen real estate
  • The phone is 10 months newer
Reasons to consider the Google Pixel 8a
  • 36% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1433K versus 1050K)
  • Handles wireless charging up to 7.5W
  • Waterproof body (IP67 classification)
  • Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR5 3200 MHz
  • Delivers 19% higher peak brightness (1506 against 1261 nits)
  • More recent OS version: Android 17 versus 16
  • 11% higher pixel density (430 vs 387 PPI)
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Nothing Phone (3a) and Google Pixel 8a crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 128 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
72.8
(Good)
Value Index
66.7
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.77 inches 6.1 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2392 pixels 1080 x 2400 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.9:9 20:9
PPI 387 ppi 430 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1300 nits 2000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3000 nits 1400 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, HDR10
Screen protection Panda Glass Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Screen-to-body ratio 87.7% 81.3%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space 99.8% 99.1%
PWM 90 Hz 120 Hz
Response time 1 ms 2 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Screen space comparison
Phone (3a)
6.77″ (19.9:9 ratio) = 17.2 in2
Pixel 8a
6.1″ (20:9 ratio) = 13.9 in2
~23% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
1261 nits
Pixel 8a +19%
1506 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 163.52 mm (6.44 inches) 152.1 mm (5.99 inches)
Width 77.5 mm (3.05 inches) 72.7 mm (2.86 inches)
Thickness 8.35 mm (0.33 inches) 8.9 mm (0.35 inches)
Weight 201 g (7.09 oz) 188 g (6.63 oz)
Waterproof IP64 IP67
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber -
Rear material Glass Plastic
Frame material Plastic Metal
Colors White, Black, Blue White, Black, Blue, Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Average (2.84/5) Good (3.52/5)
Drop resistance Good (C) · 90 drops Excellent (A) · 270 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
87.7%
81.3%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Nothing Phone (3a) and Google Pixel 8a
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 Google Tensor G3
Max clock 2500 MHz 3000 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 9 (1 + 4 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520)
- 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720)
- 1 core at 2.5 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720)
- 4 cores at 1.7 GHz: Cortex-A510
- 4 cores at 2.37 GHz: Cortex-A715
- 1 core at 2.91 GHz: Cortex-X3
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
GPU
Graphics Adreno 810 Immortalis-G715s MC10
GPU shading units 256 896
GPU clock 1050 MHz 890 MHz
FLOPS ~537.6 GFLOPS ~1594.8 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Nothing Phone (3a) and Google Pixel 8a
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
1158
Pixel 8a +29%
1491
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
3276
Pixel 8a +9%
3584
Compute Score (GPU)
4435
Pixel 8a +91%
8490
Compute Score (GPU) 4435 8490
Single-core score 1158 1491
Multi-core score 3276 3584
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
1050601
Pixel 8a +36%
1433693
CPU 402549 546093
GPU 179108 391230
Memory 194640 195569
UX 274304 300801
Total score 1050601 1433693
Samples [38 tests] [6 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Pixel 8a +161%
990
Stability 98% 67%
Graphics test 3 FPS 7 FPS
Graphics score 379 990
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
12382
n/a
Web score 11533 -
Video editing 6290 -
Photo editing 20294 -
Data manipulation 10511 -
Writing score 16899 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Nothing Phone (3a)
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-10 -> ratulislam-55CPU Throttle82%
📘 2026-07-10 -> ratulislam-55Geekbench 6 GPU3328
📘 2026-07-10 -> ratulislam-55Geekbench 6 CPU1158 / 3276
📘 2026-06-07 (Aames Ng)AnTuTu 111069149
📘 2026-06-03 (xperz3650)AnTuTu 111065584
Google Pixel 8a
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2025-12-28 (adismsha)AnTuTu 111471866
📘 2025-12-22 -> jpara_diseGeekbench 6 GPU8490
📘 2025-12-22 -> jpara_diseGeekbench 6 CPU1491 / 3584
📘 2025-12-22 -> jpara_diseAnTuTu 111397797
📘 2025-12-17 (jpara_dise)AnTuTu 111397797

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory clock 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 17)
ROM Nothing OS 4.0 Stock Android
OS size - 18.4 GB
OS updates 3 years 7 years
Security updates 4 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 5000 mAh 4492 mAh
Max charge power 50 W 18 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No Yes (7.5 W)
Reverse charging No No
Bypass charging No -
Fast charging Yes (61% in 30 min) Yes (33% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:06 hr 2:09 hr
Battery cycles 1400 cycles 1000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 08:06 hr 08:15 hr
Watching video 16:25 hr 13:00 hr
Gaming 05:49 hr 04:54 hr
Standby 131 hr 86 hr
General battery life
Phone (3a) +27%
25:03 hr
19:43 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 64 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 9000 x 7000
Zoom Optical, 2x Digital
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 120° 120°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 64 MP
2) Ultrawide: 13 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 64 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.9
Focal length 24 mm 26 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN9 Sony IMX787
Sensor size 1/1.57" (≈ 0.64 inch) 1/1.73" (≈ 0.58 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP -
Aperture f/2.6 -
Focal length 50 mm -
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL -
Sensor size 1/2.74" (≈ 0.36 inch) -
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Stabilization Optical -
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 13 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX355 Sony IMX712
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh - 60
Preview - 71
Zoom - 126
Samples - Photo samples of Google Pixel 8a from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 13 megapixels
Image resolution 6560 x 4928 4032 x 3024
Aperture f/2.2 -
Focal length 22 mm -
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL -
Sensor size 1/3.44" (≈ 0.29 inch) -
Autofocus No -
Stabilization Digital -
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby -
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* - 20
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No No
Speakers test
Max loudness
90.5 dB
89.3 dB

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced March 2025 May 2024
Release date March 2025 May 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $329 $499
Successor - Nothing Phone (4a) - Google Pixel 10a
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the battery life and design are more important to you, then choose the Nothing Phone (3a). But if the performance, gaming, and connectivity are more of a priority – go for the Google Pixel 8a.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
13 (46.4%)
15 (53.6%)
Total votes: 28

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!