Oppo Reno 14 vs Honor 400 Pro
72
out of 100
VS
80
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.59-inch Oppo Reno 14 (with MediaTek Dimensity 8350) that was released on May 15, 2025, against the Honor 400 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 14
- The rear camera has a 3.5x optical zoom
- Comes with 700 mAh larger battery capacity: 6000 vs 5300 mAh
- Weighs 18 grams less
Reasons to consider the Honor 400 Pro
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Handles wireless charging up to 50W
- 30% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2243K versus 1724K)
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 80W)
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1
- 60% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2109 and 1319 points
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.59 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Resolution | 1256 x 2760 pixels | 1280 x 2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 460 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 600 nits | 1500 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 1200 nits | 5000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.8% | 90% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 157.9 mm (6.22 inches) | 160.8 mm (6.33 inches) |
| Width | 74.73 mm (2.94 inches) | 76.1 mm (3 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.42 mm (0.29 inches) | 8.1 mm (0.32 inches) |
| Weight | 187 g (6.6 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | White, Black, Green | Black, Gray, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Good (3.74/5) | Good (3.61/5) |
| Drop resistance | Very good (B) Β· 180 drops | Excellent (A) Β· 270 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Max clock | 3350 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-A715 - 1 core at 3.35 GHz: Cortex-A715 |
- 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 12 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek APU 780 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP6 | Adreno 750 |
| GPU shading units | 768 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1400 MHz | 903-1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~2150.4 GFLOPS | ~2774 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 8534 | 14352 |
| Single-core score | 1319 | 2109 |
| Multi-core score | 4067 | 6695 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 514672 | 702885 |
| GPU | 480538 | 723128 |
| Memory | 275946 | 332058 |
| UX | 453601 | 485733 |
| Total score | 1724757 | 2243804 |
| Samples | [14 tests] | [24 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 75% |
| Graphics test | - | 11 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 1492 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 29 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 32 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 29 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 25 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 7535 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 17920 |
| Video editing | - | 7685 |
| Photo editing | - | 29553 |
| Data manipulation | - | 14371 |
| Writing score | - | 17125 |
Recent User Tests
Oppo Reno 14
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-19 (K) | AnTuTu 11 | 1656870 |
| π 2026-06-20 (Vishal) | AnTuTu 11 | 1588535 |
| π 2026-06-13 (Wal) | AnTuTu 11 | 1732207 |
| π 2026-04-28 (Jj_Cnstn) | AnTuTu 11 | 1743814 |
| π 2026-04-15 (Gabriel Pereira) | AnTuTu 11 | 1724757 |
Honor 400 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-09 (Lunka) | AnTuTu 11 | 2094129 |
| π 2026-09-01 (Maska) | AnTuTu 11 | 2163688 |
| π 2026-07-07 -> naufall | AnTuTu 11 | 2162598 |
| π 2026-06-28 (f0NES1k) | AnTuTu 11 | 2306681 |
| π 2026-06-10 (Zhan) | AnTuTu 11 | 2206753 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | ColorOS 15 | MagicOS 10 |
| OS updates | 6 years | 6 years |
| Security updates | - | 6 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6000 mAh | 5300 mAh |
| Max charge power | 80 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | - | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (75% in 30 min) | Yes (93% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:50 hr | 0:38 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1600 cycles | 1200 cycles |
| Web browsing | - | 10:11 hr |
| Watching video | - | 14:23 hr |
| Gaming | - | 06:01 hr |
| Standby | - | 118 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 200 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 16384 x 12288 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.5x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (720p) | - |
| Angle of widest lens | 116Β° | 112Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP 4) Depth: 2 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | - |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) | 1/1.4" (β 0.71 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 0.56 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 80 mm | 68 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | Sony IMX856 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) | 1/2" (β 0.5 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.6 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 16 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX355 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | - |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.6 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | May 2025 | May 2025 |
| Release date | May 2025 | May 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $400 | $799 |
| Successor | - Oppo Reno 15 | - Honor 500 Pro |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 80 W | Yes, 100 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Honor 400 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 68
Related comparisons
3.
Oppo Reno 14 vs Honor 400 (2)
