Samsung Galaxy A26 5G vs Google Pixel 7 Pro

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.7-inch Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (with Exynos 1380) that was released on March 2, 2025, against the Google Pixel 7 Pro, which is powered by Google Tensor G2 and came out 2 years and 5 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
  • Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 2048GB
  • Slow-motion recording at 480FPS
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • The phone is 2 years and 5 months newer
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
Reasons to consider the Google Pixel 7 Pro
  • The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
  • Has 2x more RAM: 8GB versus 4GB
  • 46% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1122K versus 768K)
  • 33% higher pixel density (512 vs 385 PPI)
  • Delivers 39% higher peak brightness (1083 against 777 nits)
  • Handles wireless charging up to 23W
  • Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
  • Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR5 3200 MHz
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
  • Stereo speakers
  • More recent OS version: Android 17 versus 16
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K

Review

Evaluation of Samsung Galaxy A26 5G and Google Pixel 7 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
4 / 128 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
101.7
(Excellent)
Value Index
30.9
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type Super AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.7 inches 6.7 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2340 pixels 1440 x 3120 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 385 ppi 512 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (10-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 800 nits 550 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR - 1500 nits
HDR support No Yes, HDR10+
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus Plus Gorilla Glass Victus
Screen-to-body ratio 86.7% 88.3%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space 100% 97%
PWM 240 Hz 240 Hz
Response time 2 ms 4 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
777 nits
1083 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 164 mm (6.46 inches) 162.9 mm (6.41 inches)
Width 77.5 mm (3.05 inches) 76.6 mm (3.02 inches)
Thickness 7.7 mm (0.3 inches) 8.9 mm (0.35 inches)
Weight 200 g (7.05 oz) 212 g (7.48 oz)
Waterproof IP67 IP68
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Plastic Metal
Colors White, Black, Green, Pink White, Black, Gray
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-button Yes, in-display
Repairability Good (3.22/5) -
Drop resistance Very good (B) · 269 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
88.3%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Samsung Galaxy A26 5G and Google Pixel 7 Pro
SoC
Chipset Samsung Exynos 1380 Google Tensor G2
Max clock 2400 MHz 2850 MHz
CPU cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (2 + 2 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A78
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 2 cores at 2.35 GHz: Cortex-A78
- 2 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X1
L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung
Lithography process 5 nanometers 5 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit
GPU
Graphics Mali-G68 MP5 Mali-G710 MC10
GPU shading units 160 448
GPU clock 949 MHz 848 MHz
FLOPS ~303.7 GFLOPS ~759.8 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Samsung Galaxy A26 5G and Google Pixel 7 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
1462
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
3866
Compute Score (GPU)
5079
Compute Score (GPU) 3046 5079
Single-core score 1015 1462
Multi-core score 2899 3866
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
768287
1122581
CPU 320350 381695
GPU 83203 267518
Memory 129434 156286
UX 230611 317082
Total score 768287 1122581
Samples [27 tests] [14 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Pixel 7 Pro +156%
702
Stability 98% 74%
Graphics test 2 FPS 5 FPS
Graphics score 274 702
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability - 77%
Graphics test - 10 FPS
Graphics score - 1821
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
13227
11920
Web score 11515 9424
Video editing 7315 6870
Photo editing 24850 19507
Data manipulation 10288 12051
Writing score 17482 15852

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-07 (bes)AnTuTu 12872304
📘 2026-10-04 (Subzero)AnTuTu 12919003
📘 2026-10-03 (twisee)AnTuTu 11793564
📘 2026-09-29 (Saveloy)AnTuTu 12717743
📘 2026-09-26 (maks🇰🇿)AnTuTu 12871135
Google Pixel 7 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-09 -> Kimash333AnTuTu 111253847
📘 2026-09-08 (Kimash333)AnTuTu 111253847
📘 2026-07-28 (Th3Vulkan)AnTuTu 111252895
📘 2026-06-24 (Hagoon)AnTuTu 111041828
📘 2026-04-07 -> DeadlyKPSSAnTuTu 111285265

Memory

RAM
RAM size 4 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory clock 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 3.1
Memory card MicroSD No
Memory card max size Up to 2048 GB -

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 17)
ROM One UI 8.5 Stock Android
OS size 21.7 GB 14 GB
OS updates 6 years 5 years
Security updates 6 years 5 years

Battery

Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Max charge power 25 W 23 W
Battery type Li-Ion Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No Yes (23 W)
Reverse charging No Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging No No
Fast charging Yes (51% in 30 min) Yes (46% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:26 hr 1:49 hr
Battery cycles 1200 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 06:42 hr 07:06 hr
Watching video 12:14 hr 12:49 hr
Gaming 05:11 hr 04:48 hr
Standby 100 hr 83 hr
General battery life
19:28 hr
18:28 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital Optical, 5x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 480 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 120° 126°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
3) Macro: 2 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 48 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.9
Focal length 27 mm 25 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN1 Samsung GN1
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/1.31" (≈ 0.76 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 1.2 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution - 48 MP
Aperture - f/3.5
Focal length - 120 mm
Sensor - Samsung S5KGM1
Sensor size - 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch)
Pixel size - 0.8 micron
Stabilization - Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Sensor Samsung S5K4HA Sony IMX381
Sensor size 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) 1/2.9" (≈ 0.34 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.25 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution 2 MP -
Aperture f/2.4 -
Sensor GalaxyCore GC02M1 -
Sensor size 1/5" (≈ 0.2 inch) -
Pixel size 1.75 micron -
Stabilization Digital -

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh - 70
Preview - 74
Zoom - 143
Samples - Photo samples of Google Pixel 7 Pro from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 13 megapixels 10.8 megapixels
Image resolution 4160 x 3120 3648 x 2736
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length - 21 mm
Sensor Hynix Hi-1339 Samsung S5K3J1
Sensor size 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch) 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.22 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No
DxOMark front camera
Photo - 140
Video - 146

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.2
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No -
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Depends on the region Yes
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby -
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot Yes No
LTE Cat* - 20
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Mono Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio - No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
92.1 dB
88.4 dB

Other

Category Mid-range Flagship
Announced March 2025 October 2022
Release date March 2025 October 2022
Launch price (MSRP) $190 $899
Successor - - Google Pixel 10 Pro
SAR (head) 0.41 W/kg -
SAR (body) 0.96 W/kg -
Sensors - Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Google Pixel 7 Pro is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
0 (0%)
3 (100%)
Total votes: 3

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
Avatar
Ibrahim October 26, 2025 at 03:11 PM
I think all of them are good tu use in world has modern technology but google is good in pefomance and camera than samsung thing to prove in google material like a glass when it got a damage is not easy to got ,so improve that area
0 Reply