Samsung Galaxy A26 5G vs Honor 400 Pro

55 out of 100
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
VS
80 out of 100
Honor 400 Pro

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.7-inch Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (with Exynos 1380) that was released on March 2, 2025, against the Honor 400 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and came out 3 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
  • Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 2048GB
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
Reasons to consider the Honor 400 Pro
  • 2.9x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2243K versus 768K)
  • Has 3x more RAM: 12GB versus 4GB
  • The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
  • Delivers 89% higher peak brightness (1472 against 777 nits)
  • Shows 26% longer battery life (24:36 vs 19:28 hours)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 25W)
  • Handles wireless charging up to 50W
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR5
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • Stereo speakers
  • 19% higher pixel density (460 vs 385 PPI)

Review

Evaluation of Samsung Galaxy A26 5G and Honor 400 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
4 / 128 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
101.7
(Excellent)
Value Index
48.3
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type Super AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.7 inches 6.7 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2340 pixels 1280 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 385 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 800 nits 1500 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR - 5000 nits
HDR support No Yes, HDR10+
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus Plus Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 86.7% 90%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 100% -
PWM 240 Hz -
Response time 2 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto)
777 nits
400 Pro +89%
1472 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 164 mm (6.46 inches) 160.8 mm (6.33 inches)
Width 77.5 mm (3.05 inches) 76.1 mm (3 inches)
Thickness 7.7 mm (0.3 inches) 8.1 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 200 g (7.05 oz) 205 g (7.23 oz)
Waterproof IP67 IP69
Advanced cooling - Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Plastic Plastic
Colors White, Black, Green, Pink Black, Gray, Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-button Yes, in-display
Repairability Good (3.22/5) Good (3.61/5)
Drop resistance Very good (B) · 269 drops Excellent (A) · 270 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
400 Pro +4%
90%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Samsung Galaxy A26 5G and Honor 400 Pro
SoC
Chipset Samsung Exynos 1380 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Max clock 2400 MHz 3000 MHz
CPU cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A78
- 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 4 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC
Lithography process 5 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Mali-G68 MP5 Adreno 750
GPU shading units 160 1536
GPU clock 949 MHz 903-1000 MHz
FLOPS ~303.7 GFLOPS ~2774 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Samsung Galaxy A26 5G and Honor 400 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
400 Pro +108%
2109
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
400 Pro +131%
6695
Compute Score (GPU)
400 Pro +371%
14352
Compute Score (GPU) 3046 14352
Single-core score 1015 2109
Multi-core score 2899 6695
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
768287
400 Pro +192%
2243804
CPU 320350 702885
GPU 83203 723128
Memory 129434 332058
UX 230611 485733
Total score 768287 2243804
Samples [27 tests] [24 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
400 Pro +445%
1492
Stability 98% 75%
Graphics test 2 FPS 11 FPS
Graphics score 274 1492
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test - 29 FPS
Section 1 - 32 FPS
Section 2 - 29 FPS
Section 3 - 25 FPS
Graphics score - 7535
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
400 Pro +21%
16036
Web score 11515 17920
Video editing 7315 7685
Photo editing 24850 29553
Data manipulation 10288 14371
Writing score 17482 17125

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-07 (bes)AnTuTu 12872304
📘 2026-10-04 (Subzero)AnTuTu 12919003
📘 2026-10-03 (twisee)AnTuTu 11793564
📘 2026-09-29 (Saveloy)AnTuTu 12717743
📘 2026-09-26 (maks🇰🇿)AnTuTu 12871135
Honor 400 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-09 (Lunka)AnTuTu 112094129
📘 2026-09-01 (Maska)AnTuTu 112163688
📘 2026-07-07 -> naufallAnTuTu 112162598
📘 2026-06-28 (f0NES1k)AnTuTu 112306681
📘 2026-06-10 (Zhan)AnTuTu 112206753

Memory

RAM
RAM size 4 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory clock 2133 MHz -
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 4.0
Memory card MicroSD No
Memory card max size Up to 2048 GB -

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM One UI 8.5 MagicOS 10
OS size 21.7 GB -
OS updates 6 years 6 years
Security updates 6 years 6 years

Battery

Capacity 5000 mAh 5300 mAh
Max charge power 25 W 100 W
Battery type Li-Ion Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No Yes (50 W)
Reverse charging No Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging No Yes
Fast charging Yes (51% in 30 min) Yes (93% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:26 hr 0:38 hr
Battery cycles 1200 cycles 1200 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 06:42 hr 10:11 hr
Watching video 12:14 hr 14:23 hr
Gaming 05:11 hr 06:01 hr
Standby 100 hr 118 hr
General battery life
19:28 hr
400 Pro +26%
24:36 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 200 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 16384 x 12288
Zoom Digital Optical, 3x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 480 FPS (720p) -
Angle of widest lens 120° 112°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
3) Macro: 2 MP
1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
4) Depth: 2 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.9
Focal length 27 mm -
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN1 Samsung ISOCELL HP3
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.56 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution - 50 MP
Aperture - f/2.4
Focal length - 68 mm
Sensor - Sony IMX856
Sensor size - 1/2" (≈ 0.5 inch)
Pixel size - 0.8 micron
Stabilization - Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length - 16 mm
Sensor Samsung S5K4HA -
Sensor size 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Stabilization Digital Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution 2 MP -
Aperture f/2.4 -
Sensor GalaxyCore GC02M1 -
Sensor size 1/5" (≈ 0.2 inch) -
Pixel size 1.75 micron -
Stabilization Digital -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 13 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 4160 x 3120 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.1
Sensor Hynix Hi-1339 -
Sensor size 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Depends on the region Yes
Infrared port No Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot Yes No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Mono Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio - No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
92.1 dB
n/a

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced March 2025 May 2025
Release date March 2025 May 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $190 $799
Successor - - Honor 500 Pro
SAR (head) 0.41 W/kg -
SAR (body) 0.96 W/kg -
Sensors - Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 100 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Honor 400 Pro is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
0 (0%)
1 (100%)
Total votes: 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!