Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Google Pixel 9a

40 out of 100
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
VS
67 out of 100
Google Pixel 9a

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.5-inch Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (with MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G) that was released on January 13, 2021, against the Google Pixel 9a, which is powered by Google Tensor G4 and came out 4 years and 3 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
  • Shows 27% longer battery life (25:37 vs 20:15 hours)
  • Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1024GB
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Google Pixel 9a
  • Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
  • Delivers 290% higher peak brightness (1927 against 494 nits)
  • 2.9x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1321K versus 452K)
  • Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
  • 56% higher pixel density (422 vs 270 PPI)
  • Has 2x more RAM: 8GB versus 4GB
  • Handles wireless charging up to 7.5W
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
  • Optical image stabilization
  • More recent OS version: Android 17 versus 13
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
  • Stereo speakers
  • The phone is 4 years and 3 months newer

Review

Evaluation of Samsung Galaxy A32 5G and Google Pixel 9a crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

Should I update?
No 76% Yes
Yes, we think most users will notice the upgrade.
Updating from Samsung Galaxy A32 5G to Google Pixel 9a makes sense and should feel noticeably better in daily use.
Main improvements: display, camera, and performance.
Be aware: the newer phone is weaker in battery life.

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type TFT LCD POLED
Size 6.5 inches 6.3 inches
Resolution 720 x 1600 pixels 1080 x 2424 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 270 ppi 422 ppi
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 500 nits 2700 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR - 1800 nits
HDR support No Yes, HDR10+
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 5 Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Screen-to-body ratio 81.7% 84.5%
Display features - - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space 96.1% 98.2%
PWM - 240 Hz
Response time 53 ms 1 ms
Contrast 862:1 ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
494 nits
Pixel 9a +290%
1927 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 164.2 mm (6.46 inches) 154.7 mm (6.09 inches)
Width 76.1 mm (3 inches) 73.3 mm (2.89 inches)
Thickness 9.1 mm (0.36 inches) 8.9 mm (0.35 inches)
Weight 205 g (7.23 oz) 186 g (6.56 oz)
Waterproof No IP68
Advanced cooling - Vapor chamber
Rear material Plastic Plastic
Frame material Plastic Metal
Colors White, Black, Blue, Purple White, Black, Red, Purple
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-button Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.53/5)
Drop resistance - Excellent (A) · 270 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
Pixel 9a +3%
84.5%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Samsung Galaxy A32 5G and Google Pixel 9a
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G Google Tensor G4
Max clock 2000 MHz 3100 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 2 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A76
- 4 cores at 1.92 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.1 GHz: Cortex-X4
Manufacturing - Samsung
Lithography process 7 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU Yes
GPU
Graphics Mali-G57 MC3 Mali-G715 MP7
GPU shading units 96 896
GPU clock 730 MHz 940 MHz
FLOPS ~140.2 GFLOPS ~1684.4 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Samsung Galaxy A32 5G and Google Pixel 9a
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Pixel 9a +158%
1677
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Pixel 9a +131%
4067
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) - 7784
Single-core score 650 1677
Multi-core score 1759 4067
Sources: Geekbench [3]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
452426
Pixel 9a +192%
1321069
CPU 201559 445318
GPU 39273 410687
Memory 99876 175537
UX 111718 289527
Total score 452426 1321069
Samples Less than 3 [7 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability - 81%
Graphics test - 8 FPS
Graphics score - 1060
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability 97% -
Graphics test 2 FPS -
Graphics score 362 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Pixel 9a +86%
12890
Web score 5280 10570
Video editing 5528 7547
Photo editing 12194 21264
Data manipulation 5876 12988
Writing score 7799 16308

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-12 -> Viljami22AnTuTu 12527922
📘 2025-11-13 (Hoàng Tử Băng)AnTuTu 11452426
Google Pixel 9a
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-21 (Leif)AnTuTu 111590049
📘 2026-05-13 (kiriguap)AnTuTu 111182042
📘 2026-03-09 (d1ldo)AnTuTu 11943849
📘 2026-01-03 (Joy)AnTuTu 111487240
📘 2025-11-11 (VLAD)AnTuTu 111507185

Memory

RAM
RAM size 4 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 1866 MHz 4200 MHz
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage size 64 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 2.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card MicroSD No
Memory card max size Up to 1024 GB -

Software

Operating system Android 11 (Can be upgraded to Android 13) Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 17)
ROM One UI 4.1 Stock Android
OS size 22 GB 14 GB
OS updates 2 years 7 years
Security updates 4 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 5000 mAh 5100 mAh
Max charge power 15 W 23 W
Battery type Li-Ion Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No Yes (7.5 W)
Reverse charging No No
Bypass charging - No
Fast charging Yes (23% in 30 min) Yes (47% in 30 min)
Full charging time 2:24 hr 1:41 hr
Battery cycles - 1000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 10:44 hr 08:20 hr
Watching video 14:55 hr 12:40 hr
Gaming 06:11 hr 06:06 hr
Standby 122 hr 91 hr
General battery life
25:37 hr
20:15 hr

Main camera

Matrix 48 megapixels 48 megapixels
Image resolution 8000 x 6000 8000 x 6000
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Digital Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 120 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 123° 120°
Lenses 1) Standard: 48 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
3) Macro: 5 MP
4) Depth: 2 MP
1) Standard: 48 MP
2) Ultrawide: 13 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 48 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.7
Focal length 26 mm 25 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KGM2 Samsung GN8
Sensor size 1/2.0" (≈ 0.5 inch) 1/2" (≈ 0.5 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Digital Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 13 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 13 mm 16 mm
Sensor - Sony IMX712
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution 5 MP -
Aperture f/2.4 -
Stabilization No -

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh - 145
Zoom - 99
Samples - Photo samples of Google Pixel 9a from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 13 megapixels 13 megapixels
Image resolution 4160 x 3120 4032 x 3024
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length - 20 mm
Sensor CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch) 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size - 1.12 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5 5.3
Bluetooth features PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort - Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Galileo
NFC* Depends on the region Yes
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot Yes No
LTE Cat* 16 -
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Mono Stereo
Headphone audio jack Yes No
FM radio Yes No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
93.2 dB
88.1 dB

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced January 2021 March 2025
Release date February 2021 April 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $280 $499
Successor - Samsung Galaxy A37 5G - Google Pixel 10a
SAR (head) 0.33 W/kg 0.99 W/kg
SAR (body) 1.08 W/kg 1.39 W/kg
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger - Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Google Pixel 9a is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
0 (0%)
1 (100%)
Total votes: 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!