Samsung Galaxy A36 5G vs Honor 200 Pro
63
out of 100
VS
71
out of 100
Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.7-inch Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ) that was released on March 2, 2025, against the Honor 200 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 and came out 9 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
- Shows 19% longer battery life (24:52 vs 20:51 hours)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Waterproof body (IP67 classification)
- Delivers 11% higher peak brightness (1224 against 1102 nits)
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- The phone is 9 months newer
Reasons to consider the Honor 200 Pro
- 2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1698K versus 844K)
- The rear camera has a 2.5x optical zoom
- Has 2x more RAM: 12GB versus 6GB
- Handles wireless charging up to 66W
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 45W)
- 14% higher pixel density (437 vs 385 PPI)
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1
- Reverse charging feature
- 81% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1820 and 1004 points
- Has a built-in infrared port
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | Super AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.7 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels | 1224 x 2700 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.85:9 |
| PPI | 385 ppi | 437 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1200 nits | 1200 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 1900 nits | 4000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus Plus | Aluminosilicate glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.5% | 90.8% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.9% | 99.8% |
| PWM | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 2 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 162.9 mm (6.41 inches) | 163.3 mm (6.43 inches) |
| Width | 78.2 mm (3.08 inches) | 75.2 mm (2.96 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm (0.29 inches) | 8.2 mm (0.32 inches) |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP67 | IP65 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | White, Black, Green, Purple | White, Black, Blue, Pink |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Good (3.19/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Good (C) · 90 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 |
| Max clock | 2400 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (1 + 4 + 3) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
- 3 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 4 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | - | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 710 | Adreno 735 |
| GPU shading units | 256 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 1010 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~517.1 GFLOPS | ~1689.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 3506 | 8821 |
| Single-core score | 1004 | 1820 |
| Multi-core score | 2919 | 4579 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 311567 | 516831 |
| GPU | 134619 | 495795 |
| Memory | 162720 | 270542 |
| UX | 235541 | 414892 |
| Total score | 844447 | 1698060 |
| Samples | [66 tests] | [16 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 98% | 60% |
| Graphics test | 2 FPS | 7 FPS |
| Graphics score | 315 | 998 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 17 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 19 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 17 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 14 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 4494 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 14144 | 15496 |
| Video editing | 7296 | 7821 |
| Photo editing | 24677 | 29476 |
| Data manipulation | 10326 | 12021 |
| Writing score | 14497 | 16099 |
Recent User Tests
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-10-12 (Jhzinnn) | AnTuTu 12 | 934820 |
| 📘 2026-10-04 -> Arcticmonkeys98 | AnTuTu 12 | 953956 |
| 📘 2026-10-02 (A36XQHYPER) | AnTuTu 12 | 938148 |
| 📘 2026-09-30 (kazew_) | AnTuTu 12 | 1005038 |
| 📘 2026-09-27 (Abdulgani) | AnTuTu 12 | 991604 |
Honor 200 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-08 (ChenTH) | AnTuTu 11 | 1573533 |
| 📘 2026-06-07 (Dimik) | AnTuTu 11 | 1768071 |
| 📘 2026-05-26 (Jason) | AnTuTu 11 | 1633389 |
| 📘 2026-04-25 (Олег) | AnTuTu 11 | 1801694 |
| 📘 2026-03-29 (Fenrir) | AnTuTu 11 | 1421683 |
Memory
| RAM size | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | - |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | One UI 8.5 | MagicOS 10 |
| OS size | 22.6 GB | 55 GB |
| OS updates | 6 years | 4 years |
| Security updates | 6 years | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 45 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes (66 W) |
| Reverse charging | No | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (60% in 30 min) | Yes (75% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:14 hr | 0:45 hr |
| Battery cycles | 2000 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 10:13 hr | 10:55 hr |
| Watching video | 16:02 hr | 08:13 hr |
| Gaming | 04:55 hr | 05:51 hr |
| Standby | 115 hr | 99 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 2.5x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (720p) | - |
| Angle of widest lens | 123° | 112° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP 3) Macro: 5 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | OmniVision OV50H |
| Sensor size | 1/1.96" (≈ 0.51 inch) | 1/1.3" (≈ 0.77 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 1.2 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | - | 50 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | - | 68 mm |
| Sensor | - | Sony IMX856 |
| Stabilization | - | Optical |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | - | 16 mm |
| Sensor | GalaxyCore GC08A3 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Image resolution | 5 MP | - |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | - |
| Sensor | GalaxyCore GC05A3 | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | - |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | - | 70 |
| Preview | - | 69 |
| Zoom | - | 132 |
| Samples | - | Photo samples of Honor 200 Pro from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 12 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3184 x 2388 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | - | 21 mm |
| Sensor | GalaxyCore GC12A2 | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | No | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | - | 20 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | March 2025 | May 2024 |
| Release date | March 2025 | May 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $699 |
| Successor | - Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | - Honor 500 Pro |
| SAR (head) | 0.53 W/kg | - |
| SAR (body) | 1.29 W/kg | - |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 100 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Honor 200 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 4
Related comparisons
2.
Honor 200 Pro vs Honor 200 (2)