Samsung Galaxy A55 5G vs Motorola Moto G86 Power 5G

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.6-inch Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (with Exynos 1480) that was released on March 11, 2024, against the Motorola Moto G86 Power 5G, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 7300 and came out 1 year and 3 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
  • Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR5 3200 MHz
  • 18% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1021K versus 867K)
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • Faster storage type - UFS 3.1 versus UFS 2.2
  • 8% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1137 and 1049 points
Reasons to consider the Motorola Moto G86 Power 5G
  • Comes with 1720 mAh larger battery capacity: 6720 vs 5000 mAh
  • Delivers 34% higher peak brightness (1361 against 1014 nits)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Has 33% more RAM: 8GB versus 6GB
  • 14% higher pixel density (446 vs 390 PPI)
  • The phone is 1 year and 3 months newer

Review

Evaluation of Samsung Galaxy A55 5G and Motorola Moto G86 Power 5G crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
6 / 128 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
62.2
(Average)
Value Index
99.2
(Very good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type Super AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.6 inches 6.67 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2340 pixels 1220 x 2712 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
PPI 390 ppi 446 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes
Max rated brightness 1000 nits 1500 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR - 4500 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 240 Hz -
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus Plus Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Screen-to-body ratio 85.8% 89.1%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 100% 96.3%
PWM 120 Hz 930 Hz
Response time 1 ms 4 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
1014 nits
1361 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 161.1 mm (6.34 inches) 161.21 mm (6.35 inches)
Width 77.4 mm (3.05 inches) 74.74 mm (2.94 inches)
Thickness 8.2 mm (0.32 inches) 8.65 mm (0.34 inches)
Weight 213 g (7.51 oz) 198 g (6.98 oz)
Waterproof IP67 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber -
Rear material Glass Eco-leather
Frame material Metal Plastic
Colors White, Blue, Purple, Yellow Black, Gold, Gray, Red
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.64/5)
Drop resistance - Very good (B) · 180 drops
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Samsung Galaxy A55 5G and Motorola Moto G86 Power 5G
SoC
Chipset Samsung Exynos 1480 MediaTek Dimensity 7300
Max clock 2750 MHz 2500 MHz
CPU cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.75 GHz: Cortex-A78
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.5 GHz: Cortex-A78
L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 655
GPU
Graphics Xclipse 530 Mali-G615 MP2
GPU shading units 128 256
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1047 MHz
FLOPS ~665.6 GFLOPS ~536.1 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Samsung Galaxy A55 5G and Motorola Moto G86 Power 5G
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 4101 2603
Single-core score 1137 1049
Multi-core score 3437 2939
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
1021736
CPU 348485 317933
GPU 226076 124614
Memory 182794 156837
UX 264381 267769
Total score 1021736 867154
Samples [29 tests] [6 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 98% 98%
Graphics test 3 FPS 3 FPS
Graphics score 459 400
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 5 FPS -
Graphics score 982 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
16174
Web score 11788 19980
Video editing 7255 8059
Photo editing 23283 32244
Data manipulation 10941 11846
Writing score 17673 19158

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-17 (Артем)AnTuTu 111080442
📘 2026-08-23 (No)AnTuTu 11965699
📘 2026-08-14 (Brice)Geekbench 6 CPU1115 / 3126
📘 2026-08-06 (Mazen)AnTuTu 111057022
📘 2026-06-28 (SK.EMTIAZ)AnTuTu 111021736
Motorola Moto G86 Power 5G
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-19 (Alexandru L.)AnTuTu 11919422
📘 2026-06-09 -> Josue_26Geekbench 6 GPU2605
📘 2026-06-09 -> Josue_26Geekbench 6 CPU1049 / 2940
📘 2026-06-09 -> Josue_26AnTuTu 11867154
📘 2026-06-06 (Josue)Geekbench 6 CPU1049 / 2939

Memory

RAM
RAM size 6 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory clock 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2
Memory card MicroSD MicroSD
Memory card max size Up to 1024 GB -

Software

Operating system Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 15
ROM One UI 8.5 Hello UI
OS size 20.1 GB 56 GB
OS updates 4 years 1 year
Security updates 5 years 3 years

Battery

Capacity 5000 mAh 6720 mAh
Max charge power 25 W 30 W
Battery type Li-Ion Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No No
Bypass charging No -
Fast charging Yes (55% in 30 min) Yes
Full charging time 1:03 hr -
Battery cycles - 1000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 10:24 hr -
Watching video 17:52 hr -
Gaming 05:16 hr -
Standby 125 hr -
General battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8160 x 6120 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 123° 118°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 12 MP
3) Macro: 5 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.8
Focal length - 25 mm
Sensor Sony IMX906 -
Sensor size 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 12 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length - 12 mm
Sensor Sony IMX258 -
Sensor size 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution 5 MP -
Aperture f/2.4 -
Sensor GalaxyCore GC5035 -
Sensor size 1/5" (≈ 0.2 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Stabilization Digital -

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 45 -
Preview 54 -
Zoom 75 -
Samples Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy A55 5G from DxOMark -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 6464 x 4864 3280 x 2460
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 26 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX616 -
Sensor size 1/2.74" (≈ 0.36 inch) -
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.7 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort - No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Depends on the region Yes
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot Yes No
LTE Cat* 18 -
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
91.4 dB

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced March 2024 May 2025
Release date March 2024 June 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $439 $329
Successor - Samsung Galaxy A57 5G -
SAR (head) 0.68 W/kg -
SAR (body) 1.04 W/kg -
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 33 W
Further details
Notes on Galaxy A55 5G:
    - The barometer is only available in the model for the USA.
    - SM-A556B/DS and A556E/DS models come with two physical SIM cards.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the display, camera, battery life, and design are more important to you, then choose the Motorola Moto G86 Power 5G. But if the performance, gaming, software, and sound are more of a priority – go for the Samsung Galaxy A55 5G.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
10 (55.6%)
8 (44.4%)
Total votes: 18

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
Mobilelicker94 February 26, 2026 at 09:39 PM
These two phones will probably be the last good mid-range phones with a microSD card slot. Sadly, the greed in these big corporations takes the best features from us.
0 Reply