Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.8-inch Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (with Exynos 2200) that was released on February 9, 2022, against the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max, which is powered by Apple A19 Pro and came out 3 years and 8 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
  • The rear camera has a 10x optical zoom
  • Delivers 26% higher peak brightness (1253 against 993 nits)
  • Fingerprint scanner
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)
Reasons to consider the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
  • 81% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2590K versus 1434K)
  • Shows 44% longer battery life (33:14 vs 23:05 hours)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • The phone is 3 years and 8 months newer
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • 2.4x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3940 and 1648 points

Review

Evaluation of Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra and Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

Should I update?
No 86% Yes
Yes, this is a clear and meaningful upgrade.
Updating from Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra to Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max is a clear step forward, and the improvements should be easy to notice.
Main improvements: gaming, performance, and battery life.

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type Dynamic AMOLED OLED
Size 6.8 inches 6.9 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3088 pixels 1320 x 2868 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.3:9 19.5:9
PPI 500 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (24-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 830 nits 3000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 1750 nits 1600 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, Dolby Vision
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus Plus Ceramic Shield 2
Screen-to-body ratio 89.8% 91.6%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space 98.2% 99.9%
PWM 120 Hz 240 Hz
Response time 1 ms 1 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
1253 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 163.3 mm (6.43 inches) 163.4 mm (6.43 inches)
Width 77.9 mm (3.07 inches) 78 mm (3.07 inches)
Thickness 8.9 mm (0.35 inches) 8.75 mm (0.34 inches)
Weight 228 g (8.04 oz) 233 g (8.22 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP68
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Gray, Blue, Green, Red Silver, Blue, Orange
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display No
Repairability - Good (3.04/5)
Drop resistance - Very good (B) · 180 drops
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra and Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
SoC
Chipset Samsung Exynos 2200 Apple A19 Pro
Max clock 2800 MHz 4260 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 6 (2 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.82 GHz: Cortex-A510
- 3 cores at 2.52 GHz: Cortex-A710
- 1 core at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-X2
- 4 cores at 2.6 GHz:
- 2 cores at 4.26 GHz:
L3 cache 4 MB -
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Apple Neural Engine
GPU
Graphics Xclipse 920 6 core Apple GPU
GPU shading units 384 768
GPU clock 1306 MHz 1620 MHz
FLOPS ~1003 GFLOPS ~2488.3 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra and Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) - 46450
Single-core score 1648 3940
Multi-core score 4351 10434
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
2590567
CPU 472427 788283
GPU 390230 922741
Memory 216173 226010
UX 355339 653533
Total score 1434169 2590567
Samples [17 tests] [14 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 66% 76%
Graphics test 7 FPS 18 FPS
Graphics score 900 2487
3DMark Solar Bay
Stability 65% -
Graphics test 15 FPS 42 FPS
Section 1 18 FPS 47 FPS
Section 2 15 FPS 42 FPS
Section 3 12 FPS 36 FPS
Graphics score 3874 10999
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability 66% -
Graphics test 11 FPS -
Graphics score 1967 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 13423 -
Video editing 7399 -
Photo editing 24771 -
Data manipulation 12643 -
Writing score 16337 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-21 (RAID_0)Geekbench 6 GPU10479
📘 2026-07-12 (João_Rosário_67)AnTuTu 111474557
📘 2026-06-09 (Unknown)AnTuTu 111318666
📘 2026-04-18 (Fsoceinty)AnTuTu 111329673
📘 2026-03-28 (Bakzhan)AnTuTu 111530447
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-21 (Md.Imran Shafiq)AnTuTu 112602137
📘 2026-07-31 (xon1005)Geekbench 6 CPU4028 / 10579
📘 2026-06-15 (Domi)AnTuTu 112427596
📘 2026-06-09 (Cristiano)AnTuTu 112258714
📘 2026-05-29 (Joker)AnTuTu 112433128

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 3.1 NVMe
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 12 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) iOS 26 (Can be upgraded to iOS 27)
ROM One UI 8.0 -
OS size 26.8 GB 20 GB
OS updates 4 years 7 years
Security updates 5 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 5000 mAh 5088 mAh
Max charge power 45 W 40 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (15 W) Yes (25 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes
Bypass charging No No
Fast charging Yes (60% in 30 min) Yes (65% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:59 hr 1:12 hr
Battery cycles - 1000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 09:06 hr 12:36 hr
Watching video 13:47 hr 22:25 hr
Gaming 05:57 hr 08:17 hr
Standby 113 hr 154 hr
General battery life
23:05 hr
33:14 hr

Main camera

Matrix 108 megapixels 48 megapixels
Image resolution 12000 x 9000 8064 x 6048
Zoom Optical, 10x Optical, 4x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 24FPS No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 120FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 120° 120°
Lenses 1) Standard: 108 MP
2) Telephoto: 10 MP
3) Telephoto: 10 MP
4) Ultrawide: 12 MP
1) Standard: 48 MP
2) Telephoto: 48 MP
3) Ultrawide: 48 MP
4) Depth
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 108 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.78
Focal length 24 mm 24 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KHM3 Sony IMX903
Sensor size 1/1.33" (≈ 0.75 inch) 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 1.22 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 10 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/4.9 f/2.8
Focal length 230 mm 100 mm
Sensor Sony IMX574 Sony IMX973
Sensor size 1/3.52" (≈ 0.28 inch) 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 12 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 13 mm 13 mm
Sensor Sony IMX563 Sony IMX972
Sensor size 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch) 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch)
Pixel size 1.4 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 70 -
Preview 73 -
Zoom 141 -
Samples Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra from DxOMark -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 40 megapixels 18 megapixels
Image resolution 7864 x 5200 4896 x 3672
Aperture f/2.2 f/1.9
Focal length 26 mm 20 mm
Sensor CMOS Sony IMX914
Sensor size 1/2.82" (≈ 0.35 inch) -
Pixel size 0.7 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Optical
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No Yes
DxOMark front camera
Photo 139 -
Video 145 -

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.2 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes, DP 1.2 Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 -
Type of SIM card Nano eSIM
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* 20 -
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
90.2 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced February 2022 September 2025
Release date March 2022 September 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $1199 $1199
SAR (head) 1.05 W/kg -
SAR (body) 1.58 W/kg -
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Face recognition sensor
Bundled charger Not included Not included
Further details
Notes on iPhone 17 Pro Max:
    - Battery is 5,088 mAh on the eSIM-only model (vs 4,832 mAh on the Nano SIM + eSIM version).
    - The Chinese model alone includes dual Nano SIM slots and 15 W wireless charging.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
19 (70.4%)
8 (29.6%)
Total votes: 27

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!