Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus (Exynos) vs Oppo Reno 13 5G

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.7-inch Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus (Exynos) (with Exynos 2400) that was released on January 17, 2024, against the Oppo Reno 13 5G, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8350 and came out 10 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus (Exynos)
  • The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Handles wireless charging up to 15W
  • More recent OS version: Android 17 versus 15
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • 16% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2007K versus 1727K)
  • Delivers 13% higher peak brightness (1365 against 1208 nits)
  • 12% higher pixel density (513 vs 460 PPI)
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 13 5G
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (80W versus 45W)
  • Comes with 700 mAh larger battery capacity: 5600 vs 4900 mAh
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • Weighs 15 grams less
  • The phone is 10 months newer
  • Has a built-in infrared port

Review

Evaluation of Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus (Exynos) and Oppo Reno 13 5G crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
31.4
(Mediocre)
Value Index
69.0
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type Dynamic AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.7 inches 6.59 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3120 pixels 1256 x 2760 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 -
PPI 513 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes
Max rated brightness 2600 nits 1200 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, HDR10+
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus 2 Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Screen-to-body ratio 91.6% 89.6%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 98.1% -
PWM 479 Hz -
Response time 2 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto)
1365 nits
1208 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 158.5 mm (6.24 inches) 157.9 mm (6.22 inches)
Width 75.9 mm (2.99 inches) 74.7 mm (2.94 inches)
Thickness 7.7 mm (0.3 inches) 7.2 mm (0.28 inches)
Weight 196 g (6.91 oz) 181 g (6.38 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Gray, Blue, Green, Orange, Purple, Yellow Black, Blue, Purple
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.82/5)
Drop resistance - Good (C) · 120 drops
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus (Exynos) and Oppo Reno 13 5G
SoC
Chipset Samsung Exynos 2400 MediaTek Dimensity 8350
Max clock 3210 MHz 3350 MHz
CPU cores 10 (1 + 2 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 2 cores at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A510
- 3 cores at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-A715
- 1 core at 3.35 GHz: Cortex-A715
L3 cache 8 MB 4 MB
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 780
GPU
Graphics Xclipse 940 Mali-G615 MP6
GPU shading units 768 768
GPU clock 1095 MHz 1400 MHz
FLOPS ~3406.8 GFLOPS ~2150.4 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus (Exynos) and Oppo Reno 13 5G
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 16486 9287
Single-core score 2236 1416
Multi-core score 7055 4311
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
1727874
CPU 664411 497734
GPU 643349 500794
Memory 295185 285213
UX 404613 444133
Total score 2007558 1727874
Samples [12 tests] [10 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 70% -
Graphics test 13 FPS 9 FPS
Graphics score 1758 1184
3DMark Solar Bay
Stability 65% -
Graphics test 31 FPS 18 FPS
Section 1 36 FPS 20 FPS
Section 2 31 FPS 19 FPS
Section 3 25 FPS 16 FPS
Graphics score 8133 4852
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability 57% -
Graphics test 22 FPS -
Graphics score 3812 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 16786 -
Video editing 8045 -
Photo editing 35707 -
Data manipulation 15021 -
Writing score 22404 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus (Exynos)
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-05-07 (Isaque)AnTuTu 112120425
📘 2026-03-07 (Kametek)Geekbench 6 GPU18380
📘 2026-02-20 (Gazyx)AnTuTu 112070730
📘 2026-02-18 (Юрій)AnTuTu 111924483
📘 2026-02-07 -> 2929022.OAnTuTu 112007558
Oppo Reno 13 5G
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-23 (Ghost 1944)AnTuTu 111367175
📘 2026-06-14 -> Sisig_lover15AnTuTu 111794325
📘 2026-04-04 (arjie)AnTuTu 111710602
📘 2026-03-21 (Phat)AnTuTu 111769498
📘 2026-03-18 (Chughtai)AnTuTu 111727874

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory clock 4200 MHz 3200 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 17) Android 15
ROM One UI 9.0 ColorOS 15
OS size 49 GB -
OS updates 4 years 2 years
Security updates 5 years 4 years

Battery

Capacity 4900 mAh 5600 mAh
Max charge power 45 W 80 W
Battery type Li-Ion -
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (15 W) No
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes
Bypass charging Yes -
Fast charging Yes (74% in 30 min) Yes (74% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:58 hr 0:43 hr
Battery cycles - 1600 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing - 12:13 hr
Watching video - 18:35 hr
Gaming - 07:13 hr
Standby - 134 hr
General battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8160 x 6120 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3x Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 120° 115°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 10 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.8
Focal length 24 mm 26 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL GN3 -
Sensor size 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 10 MP -
Aperture f/2.4 -
Focal length 67 mm -
Sensor Samsung S53K1 -
Sensor size 1/3.94" (≈ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1 micron -
Stabilization Optical -
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 12 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 13 mm 15 mm
Sensor Sony IMX564 -
Sensor size 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch) 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 1.4 micron -
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 12 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 4000 x 3000 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 26 mm 21 mm
Sensor Samsung 35K3LU -
Sensor size 1/3.2" (≈ 0.31 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus -
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes, DP 1.2 No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port No Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 1 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode - Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* 20 -
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Flagship Mid-range
Announced January 2024 November 2024
Release date January 2024 November 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $999 $500
Successor - - Oppo Reno 15
SAR (head) 0.74 W/kg -
SAR (body) 1.25 W/kg -
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 80 W
Further details
Notes on Galaxy S24 Plus (Exynos):
    - Two models exist: a dual Nano SIM and a single Nano SIM + eSIM variant.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the performance, gaming, connectivity, software, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus (Exynos). But if the battery life is more of a priority – go for the Oppo Reno 13 5G.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
1 (25%)
3 (75%)
Total votes: 4

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
Sourav Husain November 1, 2025 at 01:37 PM
I bought Reno 13. Today I thought I would check it out and see how it can compete. Honestly I am surprised. Because I bought it for half the price of S24+ 😅
0 Reply