Samsung Galaxy S25 FE vs OnePlus 13s
74
out of 100
VS
83
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.7-inch Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (with Exynos 2400) that was released on September 4, 2025, against the OnePlus 13s, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 3 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
- Handles wireless charging up to 15W
- The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
- Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
- Has a 0.38 inch larger screen size
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
- CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
Reasons to consider the OnePlus 13s
- Comes with 950 mAh larger battery capacity: 5850 vs 4900 mAh
- 44% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3013K versus 2087K)
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
- Supports higher wattage charging (80W versus 45W)
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- Has 2 SIM card slots
- 19% higher pixel density (460 vs 385 PPI)
- 32% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2802 and 2126 points
- Has a built-in infrared port
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.7 inches | 6.32 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels | 1216 x 2640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.54:9 |
| PPI | 385 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1300 nits | 1600 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 1900 nits | 4500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus Plus | Crystal Shield Glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2% | 90.6% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Screen space comparison
Galaxy S25 FE
6.7″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 17.1 in2
OnePlus 13s
6.32″ (19.54:9 ratio) = 15.2 in2
~12% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 161.3 mm (6.35 inches) | 150.8 mm (5.94 inches) |
| Width | 76.6 mm (3.02 inches) | 71.7 mm (2.82 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm (0.29 inches) | 8.2 mm (0.32 inches) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.7 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP65 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Gray, Blue, Yellow | Black, Green, Pink |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Good (3.19/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Excellent (A) · 270 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Max clock | 3200 MHz | 4320 MHz |
| CPU cores | 10 (1 + 2 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 2 cores at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M) - 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Xclipse 940 | Adreno 830 |
| GPU shading units | 768 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1095 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3406.8 GFLOPS | ~3379.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 18209 | 24802 |
| Single-core score | 2126 | 2802 |
| Multi-core score | 6910 | 8830 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 714011 | 868542 |
| GPU | 653511 | 1107935 |
| Memory | 303868 | 370216 |
| UX | 416496 | 666776 |
| Total score | 2087886 | 3013469 |
| Samples | [48 tests] | [6 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 62% | 80% |
| Graphics test | 14 FPS | 18 FPS |
| Graphics score | 1840 | 2366 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 32 FPS | 42 FPS |
| Section 1 | 37 FPS | 48 FPS |
| Section 2 | 31 FPS | 42 FPS |
| Section 3 | 25 FPS | 36 FPS |
| Graphics score | 8302 | 10993 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 12949 | 15017 |
| Video editing | 8051 | 6717 |
| Photo editing | 34315 | 27420 |
| Data manipulation | 13202 | 13670 |
| Writing score | 23460 | 23240 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#113th place)
Recent User Tests
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-10-12 (Vic) | AnTuTu 12 | 2495318 |
| 📘 2026-10-11 -> Viljami22 | AnTuTu 12 | 2540580 |
| 📘 2026-10-10 (Halil) | AnTuTu 12 | 2586383 |
| 📘 2026-10-03 (matthew ajero) | AnTuTu 12 | 2377317 |
| 📘 2026-09-27 (Halil) | AnTuTu 12 | 2426875 |
OnePlus 13s
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-08-24 (Vasy1163) | AnTuTu 11 | 2915150 |
| 📘 2026-08-19 (Dhruv) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 25056 |
| 📘 2026-07-28 (Vanskyver) | Battery life | SOT 4:42 / 20:00 |
| 📘 2026-07-15 (Hamza) | AnTuTu 11 | 3013469 |
| 📘 2026-03-04 (Jaini) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 24802 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | - | 5300 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | One UI 8.0 | OxygenOS 16 |
| OS size | 23.8 GB | - |
| OS updates | 7 years | 4 years |
| Security updates | 7 years | 6 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 4900 mAh | 5850 mAh |
| Max charge power | 45 W | 80 W |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (15 W) | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes |
| Bypass charging | No | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (52% in 30 min) | Yes (75% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:10 hr | 0:51 hr |
| Battery cycles | 2000 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 13:29 hr | - |
| Watching video | 14:24 hr | - |
| Gaming | 06:03 hr | - |
| Standby | 87 hr | - |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8160 x 6120 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 2x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (720p) | 480 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 123° | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 8 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN3 | Sony LYT-700 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.57" (≈ 0.64 inch) | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 75 mm | - |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV08A10 | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.4" (≈ 0.23 inch) | 1/2.75" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 12 MP | - |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | - |
| Focal length | 13 mm | - |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3L6 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/3.0" (≈ 0.33 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | - |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 150 | - |
| Zoom | 83 | - |
| Samples | Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S25 FE from DxOMark | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 12 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6528 x 4896 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2. |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.2" (≈ 0.31 inch) | 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | No | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 20 | - |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | September 2025 | June 2025 |
| Release date | September 2025 | June 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $650 |
| Sensors | - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 80 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the OnePlus 13s is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 23
Related comparisons
2.
OnePlus 13s vs Vivo X200 FE (2)