Samsung Galaxy S25 FE vs Oppo Reno 13 5G
74
out of 100
VS
73
out of 100
Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.7-inch Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (with Exynos 2400) that was released on September 4, 2025, against the Oppo Reno 13 5G, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8350 and came out 10 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
- The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
- Handles wireless charging up to 15W
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
- 21% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2087K versus 1727K)
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1
- CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- 50% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2126 and 1416 points
- The phone is 10 months newer
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 13 5G
- Shows 21% longer battery life (29:27 vs 24:20 hours)
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- Supports higher wattage charging (80W versus 45W)
- Comes with 700 mAh larger battery capacity: 5600 vs 4900 mAh
- Has 2 SIM card slots
- 19% higher pixel density (460 vs 385 PPI)
- Has a built-in infrared port
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.7 inches | 6.59 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels | 1256 x 2760 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | - |
| PPI | 385 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 1300 nits | 1200 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 1900 nits | - |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus Plus | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2% | 89.6% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 161.3 mm (6.35 inches) | 157.9 mm (6.22 inches) |
| Width | 76.6 mm (3.02 inches) | 74.7 mm (2.94 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm (0.29 inches) | 7.2 mm (0.28 inches) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.7 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Gray, Blue, Yellow | Black, Blue, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Good (3.19/5) | Good (3.82/5) |
| Drop resistance | Excellent (A) · 270 drops | Good (C) · 120 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 2400 | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 |
| Max clock | 3200 MHz | 3350 MHz |
| CPU cores | 10 (1 + 2 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 2 cores at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-A715 - 1 core at 3.35 GHz: Cortex-A715 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | MediaTek APU 780 |
| Graphics | Xclipse 940 | Mali-G615 MP6 |
| GPU shading units | 768 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 1095 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3406.8 GFLOPS | ~2150.4 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 18209 | 9287 |
| Single-core score | 2126 | 1416 |
| Multi-core score | 6910 | 4311 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 714011 | 497734 |
| GPU | 653511 | 500794 |
| Memory | 303868 | 285213 |
| UX | 416496 | 444133 |
| Total score | 2087886 | 1727874 |
| Samples | [48 tests] | [10 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 62% | - |
| Graphics test | 14 FPS | 9 FPS |
| Graphics score | 1840 | 1184 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 32 FPS | 18 FPS |
| Section 1 | 37 FPS | 20 FPS |
| Section 2 | 31 FPS | 19 FPS |
| Section 3 | 25 FPS | 16 FPS |
| Graphics score | 8302 | 4852 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 12949 | - |
| Video editing | 8051 | - |
| Photo editing | 34315 | - |
| Data manipulation | 13202 | - |
| Writing score | 23460 | - |
Recent User Tests
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-10-12 (Vic) | AnTuTu 12 | 2495318 |
| 📘 2026-10-11 -> Viljami22 | AnTuTu 12 | 2540580 |
| 📘 2026-10-10 (Halil) | AnTuTu 12 | 2586383 |
| 📘 2026-10-03 (matthew ajero) | AnTuTu 12 | 2377317 |
| 📘 2026-09-27 (Halil) | AnTuTu 12 | 2426875 |
Oppo Reno 13 5G
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-07-23 (Ghost 1944) | AnTuTu 11 | 1367175 |
| 📘 2026-06-14 -> Sisig_lover15 | AnTuTu 11 | 1794325 |
| 📘 2026-04-04 (arjie) | AnTuTu 11 | 1710602 |
| 📘 2026-03-21 (Phat) | AnTuTu 11 | 1769498 |
| 📘 2026-03-18 (Chughtai) | AnTuTu 11 | 1727874 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory clock | - | 3200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| ROM | One UI 8.0 | ColorOS 15 |
| OS size | 23.8 GB | - |
| OS updates | 7 years | 2 years |
| Security updates | 7 years | 4 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 4900 mAh | 5600 mAh |
| Max charge power | 45 W | 80 W |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | - |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (15 W) | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes |
| Bypass charging | No | - |
| Fast charging | Yes (52% in 30 min) | Yes (74% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:10 hr | 0:43 hr |
| Battery cycles | 2000 cycles | 1600 cycles |
| Web browsing | 13:29 hr | 12:13 hr |
| Watching video | 14:24 hr | 18:35 hr |
| Gaming | 06:03 hr | 07:13 hr |
| Standby | 87 hr | 134 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#55th place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8160 x 6120 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (720p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 123° | 115° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 8 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN3 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.57" (≈ 0.64 inch) | 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | - |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | - |
| Focal length | 75 mm | - |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV08A10 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4.4" (≈ 0.23 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Optical | - |
| Image resolution | 12 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 13 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3L6 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/3.0" (≈ 0.33 inch) | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 150 | - |
| Zoom | 83 | - |
| Samples | Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S25 FE from DxOMark | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 12 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | - |
| Sensor size | 1/3.2" (≈ 0.31 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | No | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 20 | - |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Category | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | September 2025 | November 2024 |
| Release date | September 2025 | November 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $500 |
| Successor | - | - Oppo Reno 15 |
| Sensors | - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 80 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the performance, gaming, connectivity, software, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE. But if the camera and battery life are more of a priority – go for the Oppo Reno 13 5G.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 15
