Samsung Galaxy S25 FE vs Oppo Reno 15
74
out of 100
VS
75
out of 100
Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.7-inch Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (with Exynos 2400) that was released on September 4, 2025, against the Oppo Reno 15, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 and came out 4 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
- 50% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2087K versus 1394K)
- Handles wireless charging up to 15W
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1
- CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- 67% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2126 and 1270 points
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 15
- Comes with 1600 mAh larger battery capacity: 6500 vs 4900 mAh
- Shows 20% longer battery life (29:05 vs 24:20 hours)
- The rear camera has a 3.5x optical zoom
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- Supports higher wattage charging (80W versus 45W)
- Has 2 SIM card slots
- 19% higher pixel density (460 vs 385 PPI)
- Has a built-in infrared port
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.7 inches | 6.59 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels | 1256 x 2760 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 385 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1300 nits | 600 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 1900 nits | 1200 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus Plus | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2% | 88.5% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 161.3 mm (6.35 inches) | 158.3 mm (6.23 inches) |
| Width | 76.6 mm (3.02 inches) | 74.83 mm (2.95 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm (0.29 inches) | 7.77 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.7 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Gray, Blue, Yellow | White, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Good (3.19/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Excellent (A) · 270 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 |
| Max clock | 3200 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| CPU cores | 10 (1 + 2 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 4 + 3) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 2 cores at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 3 cores at 1.84 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-520) - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-720) - 1 core at 2.8 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-720) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 3 MB |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Xclipse 940 | Adreno 722 |
| GPU shading units | 768 | 512 |
| GPU clock | 1095 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3406.8 GFLOPS | ~1177.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 18209 | 7750 |
| Single-core score | 2126 | 1270 |
| Multi-core score | 6910 | 4106 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 714011 | 481018 |
| GPU | 653511 | 327987 |
| Memory | 303868 | 249030 |
| UX | 416496 | 336681 |
| Total score | 2087886 | 1394716 |
| Samples | [48 tests] | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 62% | - |
| Graphics test | 14 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 1840 | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 32 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 37 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 31 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 25 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 8302 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 12949 | - |
| Video editing | 8051 | - |
| Photo editing | 34315 | - |
| Data manipulation | 13202 | - |
| Writing score | 23460 | - |
Recent User Tests
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-10-12 (Vic) | AnTuTu 12 | 2495318 |
| 📘 2026-10-11 -> Viljami22 | AnTuTu 12 | 2540580 |
| 📘 2026-10-10 (Halil) | AnTuTu 12 | 2586383 |
| 📘 2026-10-03 (matthew ajero) | AnTuTu 12 | 2377317 |
| 📘 2026-09-27 (Halil) | AnTuTu 12 | 2426875 |
Oppo Reno 15
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-10-07 -> Meksummm | AnTuTu 12 | 1443385 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| ROM | One UI 8.0 | ColorOS 16 |
| OS size | 23.8 GB | - |
| OS updates | 7 years | - |
| Security updates | 7 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 4900 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Max charge power | 45 W | 80 W |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (15 W) | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes |
| Bypass charging | No | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (52% in 30 min) | Yes (68% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:10 hr | 0:57 hr |
| Battery cycles | 2000 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 13:29 hr | 11:50 hr |
| Watching video | 14:24 hr | 17:46 hr |
| Gaming | 06:03 hr | 06:35 hr |
| Standby | 87 hr | 139 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#62nd place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8160 x 6120 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 3.5x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (720p) | 120 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 123° | 116° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 8 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN3 | Sony LYT-600 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.57" (≈ 0.64 inch) | 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length | 75 mm | 85 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV08A10 | Samsung ISOCELL JN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.4" (≈ 0.23 inch) | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 12 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 13 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3L6 | OmniVision OV08D |
| Sensor size | 1/3.0" (≈ 0.33 inch) | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 150 | - |
| Zoom | 83 | - |
| Samples | Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S25 FE from DxOMark | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 12 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 18 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.2" (≈ 0.31 inch) | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Depends on the region |
| Infrared port | No | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 20 | - |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Category | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | September 2025 | January 2026 |
| Release date | September 2025 | January 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $549 |
| Sensors | - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 80 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the display, camera, and battery life are more important to you, then choose the Oppo Reno 15. But if the performance, gaming, connectivity, software, and sound are more of a priority – go for the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 45
Related comparisons
8.
Oppo Reno 15 vs Oppo Reno 14 (6)
