Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.9-inch Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) that was released on January 22, 2025, against the Apple iPhone 17 Pro, which is powered by Apple A19 Pro and came out 8 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
  • Has a 0.6 inch larger screen size
  • Shows 7% longer battery life (28:43 vs 26:48 hours)
  • Delivers 41% higher peak brightness (1416 against 1004 nits)
  • The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
  • Fingerprint scanner
  • Comes with 748 mAh larger battery capacity: 5000 vs 4252 mAh
  • 23% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3128K versus 2538K)
  • CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)
Reasons to consider the Apple iPhone 17 Pro
  • Better camera quality (According to DxOMark rating)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • 25% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3992 and 3202 points
  • Better grip in hands – the body is 5.7 mm narrower
  • The phone is 8 months newer

Review

Evaluation of Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Apple iPhone 17 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
38.2
(Mediocre)
Value Index
23.1
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type Dynamic AMOLED OLED
Size 6.9 inches 6.3 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3120 pixels 1206 x 2622 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 498 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness - 3000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 2600 nits 1600 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 240 Hz -
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Armor 2 Ceramic Shield 2
Screen-to-body ratio 92.4% 90.4%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space 97.7% -
PWM 240 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Screen space comparison
Galaxy S25 Ultra
6.9″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 18.1 in2
iPhone 17 Pro
6.3″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.1 in2
~19% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
1416 nits
1004 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 162.8 mm (6.41 inches) 150 mm (5.91 inches)
Width 77.6 mm (3.06 inches) 71.9 mm (2.83 inches)
Thickness 8.2 mm (0.32 inches) 8.75 mm (0.34 inches)
Weight 218 g (7.69 oz) 206 g (7.27 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP68
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Silver, Gray, Blue Silver, Blue, Orange
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display No
Repairability Good (3.23/5) Good (3.04/5)
Drop resistance Excellent (A) · 270 drops Very good (B) · 180 drops
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Apple iPhone 17 Pro
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Apple A19 Pro
Max clock 4470 MHz 4260 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 6 (2 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
- 4 cores at 2.6 GHz:
- 2 cores at 4.26 GHz:
L3 cache 8 MB -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Apple Neural Engine
GPU
Graphics Adreno 830 6 core Apple GPU
GPU shading units 1536 768
GPU clock 1100 MHz 1620 MHz
FLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS ~2488.3 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
44342
Compute Score (GPU) 26581 44342
Single-core score 3202 3992
Multi-core score 10347 10688
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
3128552
2538751
CPU 987646 753740
GPU 1190760 926158
Memory 362214 217137
UX 587932 641716
Total score 3128552 2538751
Samples [66 tests] [6 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 61% -
Graphics test 17 FPS -
Graphics score 2272 -
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 40 FPS -
Section 1 50 FPS -
Section 2 40 FPS -
Section 3 29 FPS -
Graphics score 10441 -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability 56% -
Graphics test 34 FPS -
Graphics score 5827 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 21582 -
Video editing 8625 -
Photo editing 34425 -
Data manipulation 17556 -
Writing score 26844 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-09 (IceBaer)AnTuTu 123395994
📘 2026-10-04 (Gun park)AnTuTu 123085318
📘 2026-10-04 (potatowan)Geekbench 7 CPU2791 / 10180
📘 2026-10-03 (Apple Slayer)AnTuTu 123529678
📘 2026-10-02 (potatowan)AnTuTu 123590956
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-16 (Anatoli)AnTuTu 112304042
📘 2026-06-03 (Vin)Geekbench 6 CPU3890 / 10107
📘 2026-05-11 (Atti rajan)AnTuTu 112301246
📘 2026-04-10 (Resul)AnTuTu 112538751
📘 2026-02-23 (FiLsImRoZeR)AnTuTu 112106484

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 NVMe
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 17) iOS 26 (Can be upgraded to iOS 27)
ROM One UI 9.0 -
OS size 30.4 GB -
OS updates 7 years 7 years
Security updates 7 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 5000 mAh 4252 mAh
Max charge power 45 W 40 W
Battery type Li-Ion Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (25 W) Yes (25 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes
Bypass charging Yes No
Fast charging Yes (72% in 30 min) Yes (70% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:59 hr 1:18 hr
Battery cycles 2000 cycles 1000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 11:10 hr 09:51 hr
Watching video 19:32 hr 19:54 hr
Gaming 06:22 hr 06:49 hr
Standby 132 hr 117 hr
General battery life
28:43 hr
26:48 hr
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (69th and 111th place)

Main camera

Matrix 200 megapixels 48 megapixels
Image resolution 16320 x 12240 8064 x 6048
Zoom Optical, 5x Optical, 4x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 240FPS Up to 120FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 120° 120°
Lenses 1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Telephoto: 10 MP
4) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 48 MP
2) Telephoto: 48 MP
3) Ultrawide: 48 MP
4) Depth
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 200 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/1.78
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5KHP2 Sony IMX903
Sensor size 1/1.3" (≈ 0.77 inch) 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch)
Pixel size 0.6 micron 1.22 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/3.4 f/2.8
Focal length 111 mm 100 mm
Sensor Sony IMX854 Sony IMX973
Sensor size 1/2.52" (≈ 0.4 inch) 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/2.2
Focal length 13 mm 13 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN3 Sony IMX972
Sensor size 1/2.5" (≈ 0.4 inch) 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 165 170
Preview 81 -
Zoom 137 141
Samples Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra from DxOMark Photo samples of Apple iPhone 17 Pro from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 12 megapixels 18 megapixels
Image resolution 4000 x 3000 4896 x 3672
Aperture f/2.2 f/1.9
Focal length 26 mm 20 mm
Sensor Samsung S5K3LU Sony IMX914
Sensor size 1/3.2" (≈ 0.31 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Optical
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No Yes

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes, DP 1.2 Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 1 -
Type of SIM card Nano eSIM
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced January 2025 September 2025
Release date February 2025 September 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $1299 $1099
Successor - Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra -
SAR (head) 1.25 W/kg -
SAR (body) 1.42 W/kg -
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Face recognition sensor
Bundled charger Not included Not included
Further details
Notes on Galaxy S25 Ultra:
    - Supports up to 2 eSIMs. The international model has 2 physical SIM slots, while the U.S. version has 1.
    - Uses Grade 5 titanium and Corning Gorilla Armor 2 glass on both sides.
Notes on iPhone 17 Pro:
    - The eSIM-only model has a larger battery than the Nano SIM + eSIM version – 4,252 mAh vs. 3,988 mAh.
    - Only the Chinese version offers dual Nano SIM slots and it also has a weaker 15-watt wireless charging system.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the camera, gaming, connectivity, and software are more important to you, then choose the Apple iPhone 17 Pro. But if the battery life is more of a priority – go for the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
339 (65.1%)
182 (34.9%)
Total votes: 521

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
Avatar
ROBERT EMBRY November 14, 2025 at 05:02 PM
EVER THOUGHT ABOUT TWO CANS AND A PIECE OF STRING??????????????
+2 Reply
Avatar
Eee September 22, 2025 at 06:28 AM
The iPhone has way higher gaming performance and it also says it has a worse screen when the iPhone is a better screen type and brighter and the 17 pro and pro max battery life is also very wrong in battery’s testes I seen the iPhone 17 pro beats the 16 pro max in battery.
+3 Reply
Avatar
Warren November 20, 2025 at 02:33 PM
Christ, someone get this iphone lover a full stop.
+10 Reply