Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Galaxy A01

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.9-inch Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) that was released on January 22, 2025, against the Samsung Galaxy A01, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 and came out 5 years and 2 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
  • Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
  • 16.8x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3128K versus 186K)
  • Has 6x more RAM: 12GB versus 2GB
  • The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
  • Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
  • Comes with 2000 mAh larger battery capacity: 5000 vs 3000 mAh
  • Has a 1.2 inches larger screen size
  • 65% higher pixel density (498 vs 301 PPI)
  • Thinner bezels – 15.4% more screen real estate
  • Modern USB Type-C port
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • Handles wireless charging up to 25W
  • Optical image stabilization
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A01
  • Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 512GB
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • Weighs 69 grams less
  • Better grip in hands – the body is 6.7 mm narrower
  • Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port

Review

Evaluation of Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Galaxy A01 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

Should I update?
No 100% Yes
Yes, this is a clear and meaningful upgrade.
Updating from Samsung Galaxy A01 to Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a clear step forward, and the improvements should be easy to notice.
Main improvements: performance, gaming, and camera.

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type Dynamic AMOLED TFT LCD
Size 6.9 inches 5.7 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3120 pixels 720 x 1520 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 498 ppi 301 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 60 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) No
Max rated brightness - 430 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 2600 nits -
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ No
Touch sampling rate 240 Hz -
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Armor 2 Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 92.4% 77%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
-
Display tests
RGB color space 97.7% -
PWM 240 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Screen space comparison
Galaxy S25 Ultra
6.9″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 18.1 in2
Galaxy A01
5.7″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 12.4 in2
~46% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 162.8 mm (6.41 inches) 146.2 mm (5.76 inches)
Width 77.6 mm (3.06 inches) 70.9 mm (2.79 inches)
Thickness 8.2 mm (0.32 inches) 8.3 mm (0.33 inches)
Weight 218 g (7.69 oz) 149 g (5.26 oz)
Waterproof IP68 No
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber -
Rear material Glass Plastic
Frame material Metal Plastic
Colors Black, Silver, Gray, Blue Black, Blue, Red
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display No
Repairability Good (3.23/5) -
Drop resistance Excellent (A) · 270 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
92.4%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy A01
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
Max clock 4470 MHz 2000 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
- 4 cores at 1.45 GHz: Cortex-A53
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A53
L3 cache 8 MB -
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung
Lithography process 3 nanometers 12 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon 536
GPU
Graphics Adreno 830 Adreno 505
GPU shading units 1536 48
GPU clock 1100 MHz 650 MHz
FLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS ~62.4 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy A01
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
3202
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
10347
1521
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 26581 -
Single-core score 3202 477
Multi-core score 10347 1521
Sources: Geekbench [3]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
3128552
186283
CPU 987646 85561
GPU 1190760 13465
Memory 362214 51781
UX 587932 35476
Total score 3128552 186283
Samples [66 tests] Less than 3
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 61% -
Graphics test 17 FPS -
Graphics score 2272 -
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 40 FPS -
Section 1 50 FPS -
Section 2 40 FPS -
Section 3 29 FPS -
Graphics score 10441 -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability 56% -
Graphics test 34 FPS -
Graphics score 5827 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 21582 -
Video editing 8625 -
Photo editing 34425 -
Data manipulation 17556 -
Writing score 26844 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-09 (IceBaer)AnTuTu 123395994
📘 2026-10-04 (Gun park)AnTuTu 123085318
📘 2026-10-04 (potatowan)Geekbench 7 CPU2791 / 10180
📘 2026-10-03 (Apple Slayer)AnTuTu 123529678
📘 2026-10-02 (potatowan)AnTuTu 123590956
Samsung Galaxy A01
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-05-10 (JuanPablo)Battery lifeSOT 9:32 / 8:41

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 2 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR3
Memory clock 5300 MHz 933 MHz
Channels 4 1
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 16 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 eMMC 5.1
Memory card No MicroSD
Memory card max size - Up to 512 GB

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 17) Android 10.0 (Can be upgraded to Android 12)
ROM One UI 9.0 One UI Core 4.1
OS size 30.4 GB 7.1 GB
OS updates 7 years 2 years
Security updates 7 years 4 years

Battery

Capacity 5000 mAh 3000 mAh
Max charge power 45 W -
Battery type Li-Ion Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (25 W) No
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) No
Bypass charging Yes -
Fast charging Yes (72% in 30 min) No
Full charging time 0:59 hr 2:10 hr
Battery cycles 2000 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 11:10 hr -
Watching video 19:32 hr -
Gaming 06:22 hr -
Standby 132 hr -
General battery life

Main camera

Matrix 200 megapixels 13 megapixels
Image resolution 16320 x 12240 4128 x 3096
Zoom Optical, 5x Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Digital
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 120FPS No
1080p video recording Up to 240FPS Up to 30FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) No
Angle of widest lens 120° -
Lenses 1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Telephoto: 10 MP
4) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 13 MP
2) Depth: 2 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 200 MP 13 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/2.2
Focal length 23 mm 28 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5KHP2 -
Sensor size 1/1.3" (≈ 0.77 inch) 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 0.6 micron 1.12 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Digital
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP -
Aperture f/3.4 -
Focal length 111 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX854 -
Sensor size 1/2.52" (≈ 0.4 inch) -
Pixel size 0.7 micron -
Stabilization Optical -
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP -
Aperture f/1.9 -
Focal length 13 mm -
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN3 -
Sensor size 1/2.5" (≈ 0.4 inch) -
Pixel size 0.7 micron -
Stabilization Digital -

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 165 -
Preview 81 -
Zoom 137 -
Samples Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra from DxOMark -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 12 megapixels 5 megapixels
Image resolution 4000 x 3000 2560 x 1960
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 26 mm -
Sensor Samsung S5K3LU CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.2" (≈ 0.31 inch) 1/5" (≈ 0.2 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 720p at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
Bluetooth version 5.4 4.2
Bluetooth features LE LE, A2DP
USB type USB Type-C Micro USB
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
DisplayPort Yes, DP 1.2 -
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
NFC* Yes No
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 1 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* - 4
5G support Yes No

Sound

Speakers Stereo Mono
Headphone audio jack No Yes
FM radio No Yes
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Flagship Budget
Announced January 2025 December 2019
Release date February 2025 February 2020
Launch price (MSRP) $1299 $110
Successor - Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra - Samsung Galaxy A07 4G
SAR (head) 1.25 W/kg 0.35 W/kg
SAR (body) 1.42 W/kg 1.56 W/kg
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
Bundled charger Not included -
Further details
Notes on Galaxy S25 Ultra:
    - Supports up to 2 eSIMs. The international model has 2 physical SIM slots, while the U.S. version has 1.
    - Uses Grade 5 titanium and Corning Gorilla Armor 2 glass on both sides.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
30 (40%)
45 (60%)
Total votes: 75

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
What June 27, 2025 at 11:25 AM
WTF people chose galaxy a01
+1 Reply