Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G vs A36 5G

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.7-inch Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G) that was released on August 11, 2021, against the Samsung Galaxy A36 5G, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 and came out 3 years and 7 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G
  • Handles wireless charging up to 10W
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • 31% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1102K versus 844K)
  • Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR5 2750 MHz
  • Has 33% more RAM: 8GB versus 6GB
  • 11% higher pixel density (426 vs 385 PPI)
  • Reverse charging feature
  • 47% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1473 and 1004 points
  • Better grip in hands – the body is 6 mm narrower
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
  • Shows 75% longer battery life (24:52 vs 14:13 hours)
  • Comes with 1700 mAh larger battery capacity: 5000 vs 3300 mAh
  • Waterproof body (IP67 classification)
  • Delivers 31% higher peak brightness (1224 against 931 nits)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • The phone is 3 years and 7 months newer
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 25W)

Review

Evaluation of Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G and A36 5G crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

Should I update?
No 43% Yes
Mostly no. The difference is too small to matter in everyday use.
The overall difference between Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G and Samsung Galaxy A36 5G is not big enough to justify updating.
Main improvements: battery life, display, and camera.
Be aware: the newer phone is weaker in performance and gaming.

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type Dynamic AMOLED Super AMOLED
Size 6.7 inches 6.7 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2640 pixels 1080 x 2340 pixels
Aspect ratio 21.9:9 19.5:9
PPI 426 ppi 385 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 850 nits 1200 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 1200 nits 1900 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, HDR10+
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus Gorilla Glass Victus Plus
Screen-to-body ratio 85% 86.5%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space 95.3% 99.9%
PWM 242 Hz 120 Hz
Response time 6.5 ms 1 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Screen space comparison
Galaxy A36 5G
6.7″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 17.1 in2
Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G
6.7″ (21.9:9 ratio) = 15.8 in2
~8% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
1224 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 166 mm (6.54 inches) 162.9 mm (6.41 inches)
Width 72.2 mm (2.84 inches) 78.2 mm (3.08 inches)
Thickness 6.9 mm (0.27 inches) 7.4 mm (0.29 inches)
Weight 183 g (6.46 oz) 195 g (6.88 oz)
Waterproof IPX8 IP67
Advanced cooling - Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Plastic
Colors White, Black, Gray, Green, Pink White, Black, Green, Purple
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-button Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.19/5)
Drop resistance - Good (C) · 90 drops
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G and Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
Max clock 2840 MHz 2400 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
- 3 cores at 2.42 GHz: Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
- 1 core at 2.84 GHz: Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A78
L3 cache 4 MB -
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung
Lithography process 5 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 780 Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 660 Adreno 710
GPU shading units 768 256
GPU clock 840 MHz 1010 MHz
FLOPS ~1290.2 GFLOPS ~517.1 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G and Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) - 3506
Single-core score 1473 1004
Multi-core score 3767 2919
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
1102342
844447
CPU 387259 311567
GPU 163836 134619
Memory 208561 162720
UX 342686 235541
Total score 1102342 844447
Samples [7 tests] [66 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 72% 98%
Graphics test 3 FPS 2 FPS
Graphics score 435 315
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability 73% 97%
Graphics test 7 FPS -
Graphics score 1224 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 13317 14144
Video editing 7710 7296
Photo editing 29882 24677
Data manipulation 10323 10326
Writing score 15410 14497

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-12 (Zha)AnTuTu 12976692
📘 2026-03-14 (Mitu)AnTuTu 111102342
📘 2026-02-21 -> nanamondAnTuTu 111205113
📘 2026-02-01 (nanamond)AnTuTu 111128111
📘 2025-12-08 (Carlos Domino)AnTuTu 11987766
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-12 (Jhzinnn)AnTuTu 12934820
📘 2026-10-04 -> Arcticmonkeys98AnTuTu 12953956
📘 2026-10-02 (A36XQHYPER)AnTuTu 12938148
📘 2026-09-30 (kazew_)AnTuTu 121005038
📘 2026-09-27 (Abdulgani)AnTuTu 12991604

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 6 GB
Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory clock 2750 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 11 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM One UI 7.0 One UI 8.5
OS size 29 GB 22.6 GB
OS updates 2 years 6 years
Security updates 4 years 6 years

Battery

Capacity 3300 mAh 5000 mAh
Max charge power 25 W 45 W
Battery type Li-Ion Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (10 W) No
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) No
Bypass charging - No
Fast charging Yes (40% in 30 min) Yes (60% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:30 hr 1:14 hr
Battery cycles - 2000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 05:34 hr 10:13 hr
Watching video 09:17 hr 16:02 hr
Gaming 03:55 hr 04:55 hr
Standby 65 hr 115 hr
General battery life
24:52 hr

Main camera

Matrix 12 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 4000 x 3000 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 123° 123°
Lenses 1) Standard: 12 MP
2) Ultrawide: 12 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
3) Macro: 5 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 12 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.8
Focal length 27 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX563 Sony IMX882
Sensor size 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch) 1/1.96" (≈ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 1.4 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 12 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 22 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX258 GalaxyCore GC08A3
Sensor size 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch) 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution - 5 MP
Aperture - f/2.4
Sensor - GalaxyCore GC05A3
Stabilization - Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 55 -
Preview 69 -
Zoom 72 -
Samples Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G from DxOMark -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 10 megapixels 12 megapixels
Image resolution 3648 x 2736 3184 x 2388
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.2
Focal length 26 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX374 GalaxyCore GC12A2
Sensor size 1/3.2" (≈ 0.31 inch) -
Pixel size 1.22 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.1 5.4
Bluetooth features LE, A2DP LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort - No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 1 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode - Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* 20 -
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
90.5 dB

Other

Category Flagship Mid-range
Announced August 2021 March 2025
Release date August 2021 March 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $1000 $399
Successor - Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 - Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
SAR (head) 0.86 W/kg 0.53 W/kg
SAR (body) 1.58 W/kg 1.29 W/kg
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Samsung Galaxy A36 5G is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
0 (0%)
5 (100%)
Total votes: 5

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!