Vivo iQOO 13 vs Samsung Galaxy A56 5G

85 out of 100
Vivo iQOO 13
VS
66 out of 100
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.82-inch Vivo iQOO 13 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) that was released on October 30, 2024, against the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G, which is powered by Exynos 1580 and came out 4 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO 13
  • 2.5x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3150K versus 1251K)
  • Has 2x more RAM: 12GB versus 6GB
  • The rear camera has a 2x optical zoom
  • Comes with 1150 mAh larger battery capacity: 6150 vs 5000 mAh
  • Delivers 49% higher peak brightness (1793 against 1204 nits)
  • 32% higher pixel density (510 vs 385 PPI)
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 45W)
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Vivo iQOO 13 and Samsung Galaxy A56 5G crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
6 / 128 GB
60.5
(Average)
Value Index
89.8
(Very good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED Super AMOLED
Size 6.82 inches 6.7 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3168 pixels 1080 x 2340 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
PPI 510 ppi 385 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-144 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1800 nits 1200 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 4500 nits 1900 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 360 Hz -
Screen protection Schott Xensation Alpha Gorilla Glass Victus Plus
Screen-to-body ratio 89.6% 87.6%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space - 99.1%
PWM - 120 Hz
Response time - 1 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
iQOO 13 +49%
1793 nits
1204 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 163.37 mm (6.43 inches) 162.2 mm (6.39 inches)
Width 76.71 mm (3.02 inches) 77.5 mm (3.05 inches)
Thickness 8.13 mm (0.32 inches) 7.4 mm (0.29 inches)
Weight 213 g (7.51 oz) 198 g (6.98 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP67
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Silver, Green Black, Gray, Green, Pink
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.19/5)
Drop resistance - Excellent (A) · 270 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
iQOO 13 +2%
89.6%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo iQOO 13 and Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Samsung Exynos 1580
Max clock 4320 MHz 2900 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
- 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A720
L3 cache 8 MB 4 MB
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung
Lithography process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Yes
GPU
Graphics Adreno 830 Xclipse 540
GPU shading units 1536 256
GPU clock 1100 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS ~1331.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo iQOO 13 and Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
iQOO 13 +122%
3008
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
iQOO 13 +145%
9297
Compute Score (GPU)
iQOO 13 +261%
24763
Compute Score (GPU) 24763 6865
Single-core score 3008 1354
Multi-core score 9297 3789
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
iQOO 13 +152%
3150555
1251512
CPU 903944 490457
GPU 1153744 296896
Memory 415491 173263
UX 677376 290896
Total score 3150555 1251512
Samples [33 tests] [130 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
iQOO 13 +291%
2509
Stability 77% 97%
Graphics test 19 FPS 5 FPS
Graphics score 2509 641
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 44 FPS -
Section 1 49 FPS -
Section 2 44 FPS -
Section 3 37 FPS -
Graphics score 11463 -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Graphics test 37 FPS -
Graphics score 6250 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
iQOO 13 +13%
15763
Web score 14234 14131
Video editing 6801 7744
Photo editing 39527 22842
Data manipulation 13253 11699
Writing score 20704 18128

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo iQOO 13
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-02 (Fenix)AnTuTu 123392682
📘 2026-09-25 (Asuna)AnTuTu 113203192
📘 2026-09-24 (Fenix)AnTuTu 123343403
📘 2026-08-15 (Kh)AnTuTu 113166164
📘 2026-08-03 (ShiNo_Maebure)AnTuTu 113090760
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-11 -> Baogia_VNAnTuTu 111281445
📘 2026-10-09 (Baogia_VN)AnTuTu 121090096
📘 2026-10-09 (Baogia_VN)AnTuTu 111278747
📘 2026-10-09 (Baogia_VN)AnTuTu 121090096
📘 2026-09-24 (.)CPU Throttle82%

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 6 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory clock 5300 MHz 3200 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM Funtouch 16 One UI 8.5
OS size - 21.5 GB
OS updates 4 years 6 years
Security updates 5 years 6 years

Battery

Capacity 6150 mAh 5000 mAh
Max charge power 120 W 45 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No No
Bypass charging No No
Fast charging Yes (91% in 30 min) Yes (65% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:32 hr 1:13 hr
Battery cycles - 2000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 14:22 hr 11:28 hr
Watching video 17:57 hr 19:50 hr
Gaming 08:12 hr 04:53 hr
Standby 129 hr 131 hr
General battery life
iQOO 13 +6%
30:28 hr
28:42 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 2x Digital
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 119° 123°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 12 MP
3) Macro: 5 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.8
Focal length 23 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX921 Sony IMX906
Sensor size 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP -
Aperture f/1.9 -
Focal length 50 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX816 -
Sensor size 1/2.51" (≈ 0.4 inch) -
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Stabilization Optical -
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm -
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Sony IMX258
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution - 5 MP
Aperture - f/2.4
Stabilization - Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh - 145
Zoom - 59
Samples - Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy A56 5G from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 12 megapixels
Image resolution 6528 x 4896 -
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 28 mm -
Sensor GalaxyCore GC32E1 Samsung S5K3LC
Sensor size 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch) -
Pixel size 0.7 micron -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
n/a
87.7 dB

Other

Category Flagship Mid-range
Announced October 2024 March 2025
Release date November 2024 March 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $650 $499
Successor - Vivo iQOO 15 - Samsung Galaxy A57 5G
SAR (head) - 0.61 W/kg
SAR (body) - 1.05 W/kg
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 120 W Not included
Further details
Notes on iQOO 13:
    - Only the 16/512 GB variant has UFS 4.1 storage; the rest use UFS 4.0.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo iQOO 13 is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
3 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: 3

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!