Vivo X200 FE vs Meizu 22
78
out of 100
VS
80
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.31-inch Vivo X200 FE (with MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus) that was released on June 23, 2025, against the Meizu 22, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 and came out 3 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 FE
- Comes with 990 mAh larger battery capacity: 6500 vs 5510 mAh
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 80W)
- Reverse charging feature
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Meizu 22
- 15% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2454K versus 2140K)
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.31 inches | 6.3 inches |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels | 1200 x 2670 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 461 ppi | 465 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | 1800 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 5000 nits | 6000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Schott Xensation Core | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 88.8% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.8% | - |
| PWM | 360 Hz | - |
| Response time | 1 ms | - |
| Contrast | β Infinity | - |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 150.8 mm (5.94 inches) | 152 mm (5.98 inches) |
| Width | 71.8 mm (2.83 inches) | 71 mm (2.8 inches) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 inches) | 8.15 mm (0.32 inches) |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 190 g (6.7 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | - |
| Rear material | Glass | - |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Blue, Pink, Yellow | White, Black, Pink |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Average (2.99/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Good (C) Β· 100 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 |
| Max clock | 3400 MHz | 3210 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 2 cores at 2.02 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 790 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 | Adreno 825 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1024 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~2355.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 15299 | 18446 |
| Single-core score | 2209 | 2118 |
| Multi-core score | 7239 | 6903 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 662181 | 692050 |
| GPU | 664075 | 827992 |
| Memory | 295511 | 417724 |
| UX | 518654 | 517120 |
| Total score | 2140421 | 2454886 |
| Samples | [10 tests] | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 65% | - |
| Graphics test | 12 FPS | 12 FPS |
| Graphics score | 1561 | 1684 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| Section 1 | 28 FPS | 30 FPS |
| Section 2 | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| Section 3 | 22 FPS | 22 FPS |
| Graphics score | 6745 | 6943 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 13991 | 25270 |
| Video editing | 5556 | 7018 |
| Photo editing | 26454 | 56200 |
| Data manipulation | 12139 | 11731 |
| Writing score | 21943 | 30559 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#153rd place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo X200 FE
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-11 (Viva plesenΡ) | AnTuTu 11 | 2148340 |
| π 2026-08-31 (Jojorabbit95) | AnTuTu 11 | 2306009 |
| π 2026-06-14 (ShaSha) | AnTuTu 11 | 2235448 |
| π 2026-06-04 (Pranav) | AnTuTu 11 | 2140421 |
| π 2026-05-17 (Sanjeep halder) | AnTuTu 11 | 1793939 |
Meizu 22
No benchmark results yet
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | - | 4800 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| ROM | Funtouch 15 | Flyme AIOS 2 |
| OS size | 57 GB | - |
| OS updates | 3 years | - |
| Security updates | 4 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 6500 mAh | 5510 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 80 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (48% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full charging time | 0:58 hr | - |
| Battery cycles | 800 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 11:34 hr | - |
| Watching video | 15:00 hr | - |
| Gaming | 07:21 hr | - |
| Standby | 108 hr | - |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | Quad LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (1080p) | - |
| Angle of widest lens | 119Β° | 122Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX921 | Omnivision OV50H |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) | 1/1.3" (β 0.77 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | 70 mm | 72 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | Sony IMX882 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV08D10 | Omnivision OV50D |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) | 1/2.88" (β 0.35 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 0.61 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | 22 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KKD1 | Omnivision OV50H |
| Sensor size | 1/3.44" (β 0.29 inch) | 1/2.88" (β 0.35 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | June 2025 | September 2025 |
| Release date | July 2025 | September 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $650 | $640 |
| Successor | - Vivo X300 FE | - |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 90 W | Yes, 80 W |
Further details
Notes on Meizu 22:
- USB 3.2 with DisplayPort support is available only on the 1TB model.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the camera, performance, gaming, and design are more important to you, then choose the Meizu 22. But if the software and sound are more of a priority β go for the Vivo X200 FE.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 14
Related comparisons
1.
Vivo X200 FE vs OnePlus 13s (2)