Vivo X200 Pro mini vs OnePlus 13

83 out of 100
Vivo X200 Pro mini
VS
87 out of 100
OnePlus 13

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.31-inch Vivo X200 Pro mini (with MediaTek Dimensity 9400) that was released on October 14, 2024, against the OnePlus 13, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 Pro mini
  • Delivers 51% higher peak brightness (1805 against 1194 nits)
  • Weighs 26 grams less
Reasons to consider the OnePlus 13
  • Has a 0.51 inch larger screen size
  • Shows 9% longer battery life (31:17 vs 28:40 hours)
  • 13% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3145K versus 2779K)
  • 11% higher pixel density (510 vs 460 PPI)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X200 Pro mini and OnePlus 13 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
42.2
(Average)
Value Index
83.0
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.31 inches 6.82 inches
Resolution 1216 x 2640 pixels 1440 x 3168 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
PPI 460 ppi 510 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness - 1600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 4500 nits 4500 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz -
Screen protection Tempered glass Ceramic Guard
Screen-to-body ratio 90.3% 90.1%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.8% 99.6%
PWM 361 Hz 120 Hz
Response time 1 ms 2 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Screen space comparison
OnePlus 13
6.82″ (20:9 ratio) = 17.4 in2
X200 Pro mini
6.31″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.1 in2
~14% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
1805 nits
1194 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 150.8 mm (5.94 inches) 162.9 mm (6.41 inches)
Width 71.8 mm (2.83 inches) 76.5 mm (3.01 inches)
Thickness 8.2 mm (0.32 inches) 8.5 mm (0.33 inches)
Weight 187 g (6.6 oz) 213 g (7.51 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material - Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Green, Pink White, Black, Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.71/5)
Drop resistance - Average (D) · 45 drops
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X200 Pro mini and OnePlus 13
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Max clock 3630 MHz 4320 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.62 GHz: Cortex-X925
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
L3 cache 12 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 890 Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Adreno 830
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1612 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~4952.1 GFLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X200 Pro mini and OnePlus 13
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2899
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
8945
Compute Score (GPU)
OnePlus 13 +10%
24988
Compute Score (GPU) 22758 24988
Single-core score 2819 2899
Multi-core score 8705 8945
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
2779129
OnePlus 13 +13%
3145582
CPU 853223 946374
GPU 971718 1154478
Memory 348906 370624
UX 605282 674106
Total score 2779129 3145582
Samples [14 tests] [33 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
2455
Stability 62% 74%
Graphics test 17 FPS 18 FPS
Graphics score 2283 2455
3DMark Solar Bay
OnePlus 13 +12%
11360
Graphics test 39 FPS 43 FPS
Section 1 45 FPS 49 FPS
Section 2 40 FPS 44 FPS
Section 3 31 FPS 37 FPS
Graphics score 10156 11360
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus 13 +10%
6241
Stability 60% 84%
Graphics test 33 FPS 37 FPS
Graphics score 5665 6241
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
15714
Web score 13655 14928
Video editing 5778 6982
Photo editing 30547 28408
Data manipulation 12752 14424
Writing score 22229 22334
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (135th and 85th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo X200 Pro mini
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-30 -> BronelliantAnTuTu 122833803
📘 2026-06-09 (adverse)AnTuTu 112857775
📘 2026-05-31 (elega)AnTuTu 112810299
📘 2026-05-24 (Tape)AnTuTu 112812729
📘 2026-05-07 (Oleg)AnTuTu 112820364
OnePlus 13
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-13 (Phúc Lợi)AnTuTu 123331523
📘 2026-10-09 (Prigogin)AnTuTu 123195605
📘 2026-09-25 (InDominusRex)AnTuTu 123200877
📘 2026-09-22 (Keremss)Geekbench 6 CPU3032 / 9438
📘 2026-08-28 -> pavlikk69AnTuTu 113139994

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM OriginOS 6 OxygenOS 16
OS size 55 GB 54 GB
OS updates 3 years 4 years
Security updates 3 years 6 years

Battery

Capacity 5700 mAh 6000 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 100 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (30 W) Yes (50 W)
Reverse charging Yes Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (62% in 30 min) Yes (55% in 15 min)
Full charging time 0:52 hr 0:35 hr
Battery cycles - 1000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 11:58 hr 13:42 hr
Watching video 18:31 hr 23:46 hr
Gaming 05:59 hr 06:05 hr
Standby 131 hr 120 hr
General battery life
28:40 hr
31:17 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 119° 120°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.6 f/1.6
Focal length 23 mm 23 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-818 Sony LYTIA-808
Sensor size 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch)
Pixel size 1.22 micron 1.12 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.6 f/2.6
Focal length 70 mm 73 mm
Sensor Sony IMX882 Sony LYT-600
Sensor size 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 0.8 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 15 mm 15 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Samsung S5KJN5
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.75" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 6528 x 4896 6560 x 4928
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.4
Focal length 20 mm 21 mm
Sensor Samsung KD1 Sony IMX615
Sensor size 1/3.44" (≈ 0.29 inch) 1/2.74" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size - 0.8 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No No
Speakers test
Max loudness
85.7 dB
91.8 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced October 2024 October 2024
Release date October 2024 January 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $649 $899
Successor - - OnePlus 15
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 90 W Yes, 100 W
Further details
Notes on OnePlus 13:
    - The "Arctic Dawn" and "Black Eclipse" models are 8.5 mm thick and weigh 213g, while "Midnight Ocean" is 8.9 mm and 210g.
    - The Chinese and Indian versions do not support eSIM.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the gaming, battery life, connectivity, software, and sound are more important to you, then choose the OnePlus 13. But if the design is more of a priority – go for the Vivo X200 Pro mini.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
149 (47%)
168 (53%)
Total votes: 317

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!