Vivo X200 Pro mini vs Samsung Galaxy S24 (Snapdragon)

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.31-inch Vivo X200 Pro mini (with MediaTek Dimensity 9400) that was released on October 14, 2024, against the Samsung Galaxy S24 (Snapdragon), which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and came out 9 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 Pro mini
  • Shows 45% longer battery life (28:40 vs 19:44 hours)
  • Comes with 1700 mAh larger battery capacity: 5700 vs 4000 mAh
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Delivers 30% higher peak brightness (1805 against 1390 nits)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 25W)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • 21% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2779K versus 2292K)
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • 11% higher pixel density (460 vs 416 PPI)
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S24 (Snapdragon)
  • More recent OS version: Android 17 versus 16
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • Weighs 20 grams less
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X200 Pro mini and Samsung Galaxy S24 (Snapdragon) crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
42.2
(Average)
Value Index
26.3
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED Dynamic AMOLED
Size 6.31 inches 6.2 inches
Resolution 1216 x 2640 pixels 1080 x 2340 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 460 ppi 416 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (24-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness - 2600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 4500 nits -
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz 240 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Screen-to-body ratio 90.3% 90.9%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space 99.8% -
PWM 361 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto)
1805 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 150.8 mm (5.94 inches) 147 mm (5.79 inches)
Width 71.8 mm (2.83 inches) 70.6 mm (2.78 inches)
Thickness 8.2 mm (0.32 inches) 7.6 mm (0.3 inches)
Weight 187 g (6.6 oz) 167 g (5.89 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP68
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material - Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Green, Pink Black, Gray, Blue, Green, Orange, Purple, Yellow
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X200 Pro mini and Samsung Galaxy S24 (Snapdragon)
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Max clock 3630 MHz 3300 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.62 GHz: Cortex-X925
- 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 12 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 890 Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Adreno 750
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1612 MHz 903-1000 MHz
FLOPS ~4952.1 GFLOPS ~2774 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X200 Pro mini and Samsung Galaxy S24 (Snapdragon)
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 22758 17327
Single-core score 2819 2066
Multi-core score 8705 6434
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
2779129
CPU 853223 738110
GPU 971718 814230
Memory 348906 244427
UX 605282 495918
Total score 2779129 2292685
Samples [14 tests] [18 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 62% 67%
Graphics test 17 FPS 11 FPS
Graphics score 2283 1507
3DMark Solar Bay
Stability - 62%
Graphics test 39 FPS 30 FPS
Section 1 45 FPS 36 FPS
Section 2 40 FPS 31 FPS
Section 3 31 FPS 23 FPS
Graphics score 10156 7976
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability 60% 50%
Graphics test 33 FPS 28 FPS
Graphics score 5665 4826
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 13655 18350
Video editing 5778 7968
Photo editing 30547 35076
Data manipulation 12752 14984
Writing score 22229 21029
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (135th and 200th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo X200 Pro mini
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-30 -> BronelliantAnTuTu 122833803
📘 2026-06-09 (adverse)AnTuTu 112857775
📘 2026-05-31 (elega)AnTuTu 112810299
📘 2026-05-24 (Tape)AnTuTu 112812729
📘 2026-05-07 (Oleg)AnTuTu 112820364
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Snapdragon)
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-30 (Y4nnick23)Battery lifeSOT 5:30 / 18:00
📘 2026-09-20 (Iizzzuu)AnTuTu 122391410
📘 2026-09-05 (Самса с24)AnTuTu 112278769
📘 2026-08-05 (Flames-2)AnTuTu 112364143
📘 2026-06-30 (mrtcn)AnTuTu 112068918

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz 4200 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 17)
ROM OriginOS 6 One UI 9.0
OS size 55 GB 24.1 GB
OS updates 3 years -
Security updates 3 years -

Battery

Capacity 5700 mAh 4000 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 25 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (30 W) Yes (15 W)
Reverse charging Yes Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (62% in 30 min) Yes (59% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:52 hr 1:15 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 11:58 hr 07:07 hr
Watching video 18:31 hr 15:32 hr
Gaming 05:59 hr 05:03 hr
Standby 131 hr 83 hr
General battery life
28:40 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8160 x 6120
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 119° 120°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 10 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.6 f/1.8
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-818 Samsung ISOCELL GN3
Sensor size 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1.22 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 10 MP
Aperture f/2.6 f/2.4
Focal length 70 mm 67 mm
Sensor Sony IMX882 Samsung ISOCELL 3K1
Sensor size 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) 1/3.94" (≈ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 1 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm 13 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Sony IMX564
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 1.4 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh - 65
Preview - 69
Zoom - 135
Samples - Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S24 (Snapdragon) from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 12 megapixels
Image resolution 6528 x 4896 4000 x 3000
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length 20 mm 26 mm
Sensor Samsung KD1 Samsung S5K3LU
Sensor size 1/3.44" (≈ 0.29 inch) 1/3.2" (≈ 0.31 inch)
Pixel size - 1.12 micron
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No Yes, DP 1.2
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby -
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* - 20
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced October 2024 January 2024
Release date October 2024 January 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $649 $799
Successor - - Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus (Snapdragon)
SAR (head) - 0.87 W/kg
SAR (body) - 1.35 W/kg
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 90 W Not included
Further details
Notes on Galaxy S24 (Snapdragon):
    - The 128 GB variant features UFS 3.1 memory, other models have UFS 4.0.
    - There are two models: one with dual Nano SIM, and the other with 1 Nano SIM + eSIM.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo X200 Pro mini is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
96 (86.5%)
15 (13.5%)
Total votes: 111

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!