Vivo X200 Pro vs OnePlus 13T
84
out of 100
VS
83
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.78-inch Vivo X200 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9400) that was released on October 14, 2024, against the OnePlus 13T, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 6 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 Pro
- The rear camera has a 3.7x optical zoom
- Handles wireless charging up to 30W
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- Has a 0.46 inch larger screen size
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 80W)
- The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
Reasons to consider the OnePlus 13T
- 12% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3173K versus 2825K)
- Weighs 43 grams less
- 11% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2992 and 2686 points
- The phone is 6 months newer
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 inches | 6.32 inches |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels | 1216 x 2640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 452 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 2000 nits | 800 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 4500 nits | 1600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | Armor Glass | Crystal Shield Glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.1% | 90.7% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Screen space comparison
X200 Pro
6.78β³ (20:9 ratio) = 17.2 in2
OnePlus 13T
6.32β³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.2 in2
~13% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 162.36 mm (6.39 inches) | 150.81 mm (5.94 inches) |
| Width | 75.92 mm (2.99 inches) | 71.7 mm (2.82 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.49 mm (0.33 inches) | 8.15 mm (0.32 inches) |
| Weight | 228 g (8.04 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP65 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Gray, Blue | Black, Gray, Pink |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Max clock | 3620 MHz | 4320 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.62 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M) - 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L) |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 890 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Immortalis-G925 MC12 | Adreno 830 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1612 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~4952.1 GFLOPS | ~3379.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 21444 | 24853 |
| Single-core score | 2686 | 2992 |
| Multi-core score | 8366 | 9307 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 900074 | 950649 |
| GPU | 972096 | 1161132 |
| Memory | 345330 | 356504 |
| UX | 607687 | 705389 |
| Total score | 2825187 | 3173674 |
| Samples | [22 tests] | [8 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 61% | 91% |
| Graphics test | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| Graphics score | 2371 | 2468 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 40 FPS | 42 FPS |
| Section 1 | 44 FPS | 48 FPS |
| Section 2 | 41 FPS | 42 FPS |
| Section 3 | 34 FPS | 35 FPS |
| Graphics score | 10432 | 11020 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | 65% | - |
| Graphics test | 36 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 6122 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 13701 | 21599 |
| Video editing | 5803 | 8606 |
| Photo editing | 35653 | 29817 |
| Data manipulation | 13567 | 16672 |
| Writing score | 23556 | 24602 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (133rd and 82nd place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo X200 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-12 (Oussama barhmate) | AnTuTu 12 | 3135000 |
| π 2026-08-01 -> Dlack | AnTuTu 11 | 2847396 |
| π 2026-08-01 (Dlack) | AnTuTu 11 | 2847396 |
| π 2026-07-31 (Xarvis) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 23591 |
| π 2026-07-31 (Xarvis) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2432 / 8113 |
OnePlus 13T
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-10-05 (sosalka) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2748 / 8459 |
| π 2026-04-04 (ΠΠ±ΡΠΌΠ΅) | AnTuTu 11 | 3227783 |
| π 2026-03-21 (Ian) | AnTuTu 11 | 3173674 |
| π 2026-03-11 (huinamb) | AnTuTu 11 | 2988190 |
| π 2026-02-16 -> qd1chz | AnTuTu 11 | 3397578 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5333 MHz | 5300 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 15 |
| ROM | Funtouch OS 16 | ColorOS 15 |
| OS size | - | 54 GB |
| OS updates | 3 years | 4 years |
| Security updates | 3 years | 6 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6000 mAh | 6260 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 80 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (30 W) | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Bypass charging | Yes | - |
| Fast charging | Yes (73% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 21 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:46 hr | 1:01 hr |
| Web browsing | 12:47 hr | - |
| Watching video | 16:41 hr | - |
| Gaming | 07:44 hr | - |
| Standby | 85 hr | - |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.7x | Optical, 2x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (1080p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 119Β° | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 200 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-818 | Sony IMX906 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28" (β 0.78 inch) | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.22 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.7 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 85 mm | - |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP9 | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4" (β 0.71 inch) | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.56 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | - |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | - |
| Focal length | 15 mm | - |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6528 x 4896 | - |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KKD1 | Sony IMX480 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.42" (β 0.29 inch) | 1/3.09" (β 0.32 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | October 2024 | April 2025 |
| Release date | October 2024 | April 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $847 | $650 |
| Successor | - Vivo X300 Pro | - OnePlus 15T |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 90 W | Yes, 80 W |
Further details
Notes on X200 Pro:
- The black model is thinner (8.2 mm) and lighter (223g).
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the camera and connectivity are more important to you, then choose the Vivo X200 Pro. But if the performance, gaming, battery life, and sound are more of a priority β go for the OnePlus 13T.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 7