Vivo X200 Pro vs iQOO 15 Ultra
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.78-inch Vivo X200 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9400) that was released on October 14, 2024, against the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and came out 1 year and 4 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 Pro
- Delivers 33% higher peak brightness (2052 against 1543 nits)
- The rear camera has a 3.7x optical zoom
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 63% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4602K versus 2825K)
- Comes with 1400 mAh larger battery capacity: 7400 vs 6000 mAh
- Higher display refresh rate β 144 Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
- Has 33% more RAM: 16GB versus 12GB
- The phone is 1 year and 4 months newer
- 12% higher pixel density (508 vs 452 PPI)
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 inches | 6.85 inches |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels | 1440 x 3168 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.8:9 |
| PPI | 452 ppi | 508 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 2000 nits | 2600 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 4500 nits | 8000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | 475 Hz |
| Screen protection | Armor Glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.1% | 90.7% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | - | 100% |
| PWM | - | 120 Hz |
| Response time | - | 1 ms |
| Contrast | - | β Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 162.36 mm (6.39 inches) | 163.65 mm (6.44 inches) |
| Width | 75.92 mm (2.99 inches) | 76.8 mm (3.02 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.49 mm (0.33 inches) | 8.7 mm (0.34 inches) |
| Weight | 228 g (8.04 oz) | 227 g (8.01 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Active fan |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Gray, Blue | Black, Silver |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Max clock | 3620 MHz | 4610 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.62 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
- 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance - 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 890 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Immortalis-G925 MC12 | Adreno 840 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1612 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~4952.1 GFLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 21444 | 27924 |
| Single-core score | 2686 | 3615 |
| Multi-core score | 8366 | 11366 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 900074 | 1102292 |
| GPU | 972096 | 1604604 |
| Memory | 345330 | 789150 |
| UX | 607687 | 1106244 |
| Total score | 2825187 | 4602290 |
| Samples | [22 tests] | [3 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 61% | 68% |
| Graphics test | 18 FPS | 23 FPS |
| Graphics score | 2371 | 3081 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 40 FPS | 54 FPS |
| Section 1 | 44 FPS | 60 FPS |
| Section 2 | 41 FPS | 55 FPS |
| Section 3 | 34 FPS | 46 FPS |
| Graphics score | 10432 | 14183 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | 65% | - |
| Graphics test | 36 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 6122 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 13701 | 18545 |
| Video editing | 5803 | 6849 |
| Photo editing | 35653 | 34832 |
| Data manipulation | 13567 | 14303 |
| Writing score | 23556 | 28711 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (133rd and 14th place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo X200 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-12 (Oussama barhmate) | AnTuTu 12 | 3135000 |
| π 2026-08-01 -> Dlack | AnTuTu 11 | 2847396 |
| π 2026-08-01 (Dlack) | AnTuTu 11 | 2847396 |
| π 2026-07-31 (Xarvis) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 23591 |
| π 2026-07-31 (Xarvis) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2432 / 8113 |
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-30 (NPT) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 3568 / 11293 |
| π 2026-04-04 (Khamidovv) | AnTuTu 11 | 4602290 |
| π 2026-04-04 (Khamidovv) | AnTuTu 11 | 4651882 |
| π 2026-02-08 (z strikes again) | AnTuTu 11 | 4314224 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5333 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 16 |
| ROM | Funtouch OS 16 | OriginOS 6 |
| OS size | - | 96 GB |
| OS updates | 3 years | 5 years |
| Security updates | 3 years | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6000 mAh | 7400 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (30 W) | Yes (40 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (73% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 24 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:46 hr | 1:06 hr |
| Web browsing | 12:47 hr | - |
| Watching video | 16:41 hr | - |
| Gaming | 07:44 hr | - |
| Standby | 85 hr | - |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.7x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (1080p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 119Β° | 107Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 200 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-818 | Sony IMX921 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28" (β 0.78 inch) | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.22 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.7 | f/2.7 |
| Focal length | 85 mm | 85 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP9 | Sony IMX882 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4" (β 0.71 inch) | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.56 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6528 x 4896 | 6528 x 4896 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KKD1 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.42" (β 0.29 inch) | 1/3.1" (β 0.32 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | October 2024 | February 2026 |
| Release date | October 2024 | February 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $847 | $849 |
| Successor | - Vivo X300 Pro | - |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 90 W | Yes, 100 W |
Further details
Notes on X200 Pro:
- The black model is thinner (8.2 mm) and lighter (223g).
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra. It has a better display, performance, gaming, battery life, and sound.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 2