Vivo X200 Pro vs iQOO 15 Ultra

84 out of 100
Vivo X200 Pro
VS
91 out of 100
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.78-inch Vivo X200 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9400) that was released on October 14, 2024, against the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and came out 1 year and 4 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 Pro
  • Delivers 33% higher peak brightness (2052 against 1543 nits)
  • The rear camera has a 3.7x optical zoom
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • 63% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4602K versus 2825K)
  • Comes with 1400 mAh larger battery capacity: 7400 vs 6000 mAh
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Has 33% more RAM: 16GB versus 12GB
  • The phone is 1 year and 4 months newer
  • 12% higher pixel density (508 vs 452 PPI)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X200 Pro and iQOO 15 Ultra crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
16 / 256 GB
42.1
(Average)
Value Index
59.9
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.78 inches 6.85 inches
Resolution 1260 x 2800 pixels 1440 x 3168 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.8:9
PPI 452 ppi 508 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes
Max rated brightness 2000 nits 2600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 4500 nits 8000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz 475 Hz
Screen protection Armor Glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 90.1% 90.7%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space - 100%
PWM - 120 Hz
Response time - 1 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
X200 Pro +33%
2052 nits
1543 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 162.36 mm (6.39 inches) 163.65 mm (6.44 inches)
Width 75.92 mm (2.99 inches) 76.8 mm (3.02 inches)
Thickness 8.49 mm (0.33 inches) 8.7 mm (0.34 inches)
Weight 228 g (8.04 oz) 227 g (8.01 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Active fan
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Gray, Blue Black, Silver
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
90.1%
90.7%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X200 Pro and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Max clock 3620 MHz 4610 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.62 GHz: Cortex-X925
- 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
L3 cache 12 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 890 Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Immortalis-G925 MC12 Adreno 840
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1612 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~4952.1 GFLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X200 Pro and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2686
3615
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
8366
11366
Compute Score (GPU)
21444
27924
Compute Score (GPU) 21444 27924
Single-core score 2686 3615
Multi-core score 8366 11366
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
2825187
4602290
CPU 900074 1102292
GPU 972096 1604604
Memory 345330 789150
UX 607687 1106244
Total score 2825187 4602290
Samples [22 tests] [3 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
2371
3081
Stability 61% 68%
Graphics test 18 FPS 23 FPS
Graphics score 2371 3081
3DMark Solar Bay
10432
14183
Graphics test 40 FPS 54 FPS
Section 1 44 FPS 60 FPS
Section 2 41 FPS 55 FPS
Section 3 34 FPS 46 FPS
Graphics score 10432 14183
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability 65% -
Graphics test 36 FPS -
Graphics score 6122 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
15327
16452
Web score 13701 18545
Video editing 5803 6849
Photo editing 35653 34832
Data manipulation 13567 14303
Writing score 23556 28711
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (133rd and 14th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo X200 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Oussama barhmate)AnTuTu 123135000
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-01 -> DlackAnTuTu 112847396
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-01 (Dlack)AnTuTu 112847396
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Xarvis)Geekbench 6 GPU23591
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Xarvis)Geekbench 6 CPU2432 / 8113
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-30 (NPT)Geekbench 6 CPU3568 / 11293
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-04 (Khamidovv)AnTuTu 114602290
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-04 (Khamidovv)AnTuTu 114651882
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-08 (z strikes again)AnTuTu 114314224

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 16 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5333 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 16
ROM Funtouch OS 16 OriginOS 6
OS size - 96 GB
OS updates 3 years 5 years
Security updates 3 years 5 years

Battery

Capacity 6000 mAh 7400 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 100 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (30 W) Yes (40 W)
Reverse charging Yes Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (73% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 24 min)
Full charging time 0:46 hr 1:06 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 12:47 hr -
Watching video 16:41 hr -
Gaming 07:44 hr -
Standby 85 hr -
General battery life
24:55 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3.7x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 119Β° 107Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.6 f/1.9
Focal length 23 mm 23 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-818 Sony IMX921
Sensor size 1/1.28" (β‰ˆ 0.78 inch) 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1.22 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 200 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.7 f/2.7
Focal length 85 mm 85 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HP9 Sony IMX882
Sensor size 1/1.4" (β‰ˆ 0.71 inch) 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.56 micron 0.8 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.1
Focal length 15 mm 15 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 -
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 6528 x 4896 6528 x 4896
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length 20 mm 21 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KKD1 CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.42" (β‰ˆ 0.29 inch) 1/3.1" (β‰ˆ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.7 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
n/a
91.18 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced October 2024 February 2026
Release date October 2024 February 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $847 $849
Successor - Vivo X300 Pro -
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 90 W Yes, 100 W
Further details
Notes on X200 Pro:
    - The black model is thinner (8.2 mm) and lighter (223g).
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra. It has a better display, performance, gaming, battery life, and sound.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
2 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: 2

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!