Vivo X300s vs Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global)

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.82-inch Vivo X300s (with MediaTek Dimensity 9500) that was released on March 30, 2026, against the Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global), which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super and came out 3 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300s
  • 52% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3703K versus 2429K)
  • Handles wireless charging up to 40W
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Has a 0.5 inch larger screen size
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 80W)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 3.1
  • 2.2x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3390 and 1567 points
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global)
  • The rear camera has a 3.5x optical zoom
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • Weighs 29 grams less

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X300s and Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global) crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
54.1
(Average)
Value Index
41.7
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.82 inches 6.32 inches
Resolution 1260 x 2800 pixels 1216 x 2640 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
PPI 452 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes
Max rated brightness 2000 nits 1800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 4500 nits 3600 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz 240 Hz
Screen protection Reinforced Glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 91.8% 89.6%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space - 99.6%
PWM - 90 Hz
Response time - 1 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Screen space comparison
Vivo X300s
6.82″ (20:9 ratio) = 17.4 in2
Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global)
6.32″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.2 in2
~14% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 162 mm (6.38 inches) 151.21 mm (5.95 inches)
Width 75.5 mm (2.97 inches) 72.42 mm (2.85 inches)
Thickness 8 mm (0.31 inches) 8.2 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 217 g (7.65 oz) 188 g (6.63 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Silver, Green, Purple White, Black, Purple
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X300s and Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global)
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9500 MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super
Max clock 4210 MHz 3400 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro
- 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium
- 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra
- 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 3 cores at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-A725
L3 cache 16 MB 6 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 990 MediaTek NPU 880
GPU
Graphics Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 Mali-G720 MP8
GPU shading units 1536 1024
GPU clock 1716 MHz 1508 MHz
FLOPS ~5271.5 GFLOPS ~3088.4 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X300s and Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global)
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) - 14852
Single-core score 3390 1567
Multi-core score 10059 5965
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Vivo X300s +52%
3703823
CPU 987627 612932
GPU 1399169 952016
Memory 541165 394012
UX 775859 470174
Total score 3703823 2429134
Samples Less than 3 Less than 3
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (44th and 160th place)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5333 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM OriginOS 6 ColorOS 16
OS size - 56 GB
OS updates 5 years 5 years
Security updates 5 years 6 years

Battery

Capacity 7100 mAh 6700 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 80 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (40 W) No
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes Yes (50% in 30 min)
Full charging time - 1:03 hr

Main camera

Matrix 200 megapixels 200 megapixels
Image resolution 16320 x 12288 16320 x 12240
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 3.5x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 120FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 960 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 119° 116°
Lenses 1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 200 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/1.8
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HPB Samsung ISOCELL S5KHP5
Sensor size 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 0.56 micron 0.5 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.6 f/2.8
Focal length 70 mm 80 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-602 Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN5
Sensor size 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 15 mm 16 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 GalaxyCore GC50F6
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.61 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 20 mm 18 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN5
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No No

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced March 2026 June 2026
Release date April 2026 July 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $899 $899
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger - Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo X300s is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
1 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!