Xiaomi 11T vs Samsung Galaxy A25
54
out of 100
VS
51
out of 100
Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.67-inch Xiaomi 11T (with MediaTek Dimensity 1200) that was released on September 15, 2021, against the Samsung Galaxy A25, which is powered by Exynos 1280 and came out 2 years and 3 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 11T
- Water-resistant body (IP53 classification)
- Has 2x more RAM: 8GB versus 4GB
- 47% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (904K versus 617K)
- Shows 23% longer battery life (22:44 vs 18:26 hours)
- Supports higher wattage charging (67W versus 25W)
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
- Faster storage type - UFS 3.1 versus UFS 2.2
- 12% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1076 and 957 points
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A25
- Delivers 29% higher peak brightness (1030 against 796 nits)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
- Optical image stabilization
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1024GB
- The phone is 2 years and 3 months newer
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 inches | 6.5 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1080 x 2340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 395 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max rated brightness | 800 nits | 1000 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 1000 nits | - |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | No |
| Touch sampling rate | 480 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1% | 84.2% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| RGB color space | 99.8% | 145.1% |
| PWM | 120 Hz | 119 Hz |
| Response time | 2.8 ms | 1 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 164.1 mm (6.46 inches) | 161 mm (6.34 inches) |
| Width | 76.9 mm (3.03 inches) | 76.5 mm (3.01 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm (0.35 inches) | 8.3 mm (0.33 inches) |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP53 | No |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | - |
| Rear material | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame material | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | White, Gray, Blue | Black, Blue, Yellow |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | Yes, in-button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 | Samsung Exynos 1280 |
| Max clock | 3000 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A78 - 1 core at 3 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | - |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 5 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek APU 3.0 | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
| GPU shading units | 288 | 128 |
| GPU clock | 886 MHz | 897 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~510.3 GFLOPS | ~229.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | - | 2348 |
| Single-core score | 1076 | 957 |
| Multi-core score | 3051 | 2095 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 346820 | 246621 |
| GPU | 148373 | 71605 |
| Memory | 187659 | 102085 |
| UX | 221667 | 197004 |
| Total score | 904519 | 617315 |
| Samples | [3 tests] | [22 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 96% | 95% |
| Graphics test | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
| Graphics score | 442 | 226 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | 79% | 99% |
| Graphics test | 7 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 1311 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 9284 | - |
| Video editing | 6385 | - |
| Photo editing | 25491 | - |
| Data manipulation | 10275 | - |
| Writing score | 14338 | - |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi 11T
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-05-04 (Варфоломей Игоревич) | AnTuTu 11 | 773735 |
| 📘 2026-03-23 (Mario) | AnTuTu 11 | 904519 |
| 📘 2026-02-10 (Gofer) | AnTuTu 11 | 1017918 |
Samsung Galaxy A25
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-10-10 -> Black_KRGM | AnTuTu 12 | 765124 |
| 📘 2026-10-09 (James) | AnTuTu 11 | 612157 |
| 📘 2026-07-14 (DJ) | AnTuTu 11 | 651423 |
| 📘 2026-06-15 (OmPhanLaoRaBien) | AnTuTu 11 | 637428 |
| 📘 2026-06-02 (MusteryLodall) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 936 / 2053 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | No | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | - | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 11 (Can be upgraded to Android 14) | Android 14 |
| ROM | HyperOS 1.0 | One UI 6 |
| OS size | 26 GB | 20 GB |
| OS updates | 3 years | 2 years |
| Security updates | 4 years | 3 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 67 W | 25 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (86% in 30 min) | Yes (49% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:41 hr | 1:24 hr |
| Web browsing | 08:33 hr | 06:44 hr |
| Watching video | 14:58 hr | 11:34 hr |
| Gaming | 05:23 hr | 04:52 hr |
| Standby | 108 hr | 91 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 12032 x 9024 | 8160 x 6120 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (720p) | 240 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 120° | 120° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 108 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP 3) Macro: 5 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP 3) Macro: 2 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 27 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KHM2 | Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.52" (≈ 0.66 inch) | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | Sony IMX355 | Samsung ISOCELL (S5K)4HA |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) | 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Image resolution | 5 MP | 2 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 50 mm | - |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K5E9 | GalaxyCore GC02M1 |
| Sensor size | 1/5.0" (≈ 0.2 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Samples | Photo samples of Xiaomi 11T from DxOMark | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 16 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4160 x 3120 |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | - |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV16A10 | Hynix Hi-1339 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch) | 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
DxOMark front camera
| Photo | 110 | - |
| Video | 124 | - |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, HID, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | Yes |
| LTE Cat* | 18 | 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | Yes |
| FM radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | September 2021 | December 2023 |
| Release date | October 2021 | December 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $500 | $299 |
| Successor | - Xiaomi 15T | - Samsung Galaxy A26 5G |
| SAR (head) | 0.55 W/kg | 0.46 W/kg |
| SAR (body) | 0.95 W/kg | 1.19 W/kg |
| Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | - | Not included |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the performance, gaming, battery life, and design are more important to you, then choose the Xiaomi 11T. But if the display and camera are more of a priority – go for the Samsung Galaxy A25.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 11
Related comparisons
4.
Xiaomi 11T vs Xiaomi 11T Pro (1)