Xiaomi 12 Pro vs Honor 200 Pro
62
out of 100
VS
71
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.73-inch Xiaomi 12 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1) that was released on December 28, 2021, against the Honor 200 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 and came out 2 years and 5 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 12 Pro
- 19% higher pixel density (521 vs 437 PPI)
- Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 100W)
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
Reasons to consider the Honor 200 Pro
- Water-resistant body (IP65 classification)
- Shows 23% longer battery life (20:51 vs 16:53 hours)
- Better camera quality (According to DxOMark rating)
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
- The rear camera has a 2.5x optical zoom
- 26% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1698K versus 1349K)
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- The phone is 2 years and 5 months newer
- The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.73 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels | 1224 x 2700 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.85:9 |
| PPI | 521 ppi | 437 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 970 nits | 1200 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 1500 nits | 4000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 480 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus | Aluminosilicate glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5% | 90.8% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.8% | 99.8% |
| PWM | 367 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Response time | 5 ms | 2 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 163.6 mm (6.44 inches) | 163.3 mm (6.43 inches) |
| Width | 74.6 mm (2.94 inches) | 75.2 mm (2.96 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.66 mm (0.34 inches) | 8.2 mm (0.32 inches) |
| Weight | 204 g (7.2 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | IP65 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green, Pink | White, Black, Blue, Pink |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 |
| Max clock | 3000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 4 + 3) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 2.5 GHz: Cortex-A710 - 1 core at 3 GHz: Cortex-X2 |
- 3 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 4 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 730 | Adreno 735 |
| GPU shading units | 1024 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 818 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~1675.3 GFLOPS | ~1689.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 3743 | 8821 |
| Single-core score | 968 | 1820 |
| Multi-core score | 3605 | 4579 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 500024 | 516831 |
| GPU | 223043 | 495795 |
| Memory | 243998 | 270542 |
| UX | 382743 | 414892 |
| Total score | 1349808 | 1698060 |
| Samples | [6 tests] | [16 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 60% |
| Graphics test | - | 7 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 998 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 17 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 19 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 17 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 14 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 4494 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | 88% | - |
| Graphics test | 14 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 2479 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 8304 | 15496 |
| Video editing | 6949 | 7821 |
| Photo editing | 25400 | 29476 |
| Data manipulation | 9541 | 12021 |
| Writing score | 13100 | 16099 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi 12 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-27 (Tema) | CPU Throttle | 86% |
| 📘 2026-06-07 (Tema) | AnTuTu 11 | 1603387 |
| 📘 2026-04-15 (Max) | AnTuTu 11 | 1349808 |
| 📘 2026-04-03 (12 pro) | AnTuTu 11 | 1555919 |
| 📘 2026-03-29 (thxthelow) | AnTuTu 11 | 1297778 |
Honor 200 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-08 (ChenTH) | AnTuTu 11 | 1573533 |
| 📘 2026-06-07 (Dimik) | AnTuTu 11 | 1768071 |
| 📘 2026-05-26 (Jason) | AnTuTu 11 | 1633389 |
| 📘 2026-04-25 (Олег) | AnTuTu 11 | 1801694 |
| 📘 2026-03-29 (Fenrir) | AnTuTu 11 | 1421683 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 3200 MHz | - |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 12 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | HyperOS 3 | MagicOS 10 |
| OS size | 26.5 GB | 55 GB |
| OS updates | - | 4 years |
| Security updates | - | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 4600 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 120 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (66 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | - | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 8 min) | Yes (75% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:21 hr | 0:45 hr |
| Web browsing | 06:40 hr | 10:55 hr |
| Watching video | 10:08 hr | 08:13 hr |
| Gaming | 04:44 hr | 05:51 hr |
| Standby | 81 hr | 99 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8700 x 5800 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 2x | Optical, 2.5x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 24FPS | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 1920 FPS (720p) | - |
| Angle of widest lens | 115° | 112° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | - |
| Sensor | Sony IMX707 | OmniVision OV50H |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) | 1/1.3" (≈ 0.77 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.22 micron | 1.2 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 48 mm | 68 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung JN1 | Sony IMX856 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 14 mm | 16 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung JN1 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 70 | 70 |
| Preview | 70 | 69 |
| Zoom | 102 | 132 |
| Samples | Photo samples of Xiaomi 12 Pro from DxOMark | Photo samples of Honor 200 Pro from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6528 x 4896 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV32b40 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.14" (≈ 0.32 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | - | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 20 | 20 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | December 2021 | May 2024 |
| Release date | December 2021 | May 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $699 |
| Successor | - Xiaomi 15 Pro | - Honor 500 Pro |
| Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 120 W | Yes, 100 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Honor 200 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 21
Related comparisons
3.
Honor 200 Pro vs Honor 200 (2)