Xiaomi 13T vs Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

65 out of 100
Xiaomi 13T
VS
73 out of 100
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.67-inch Xiaomi 13T (with MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultra) that was released on September 26, 2023, against the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, which is powered by Exynos 2400e and came out 1 year after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 13T
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (67W versus 25W)
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • 16% higher pixel density (446 vs 385 PPI)
  • Weighs 16 grams less
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
  • 68% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1977K versus 1175K)
  • Better camera quality (According to DxOMark rating)
  • Handles wireless charging up to 15W
  • The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
  • Delivers 9% higher peak brightness (1372 against 1256 nits)
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • The phone is 1 year newer
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi 13T and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
59.4
(Average)
Value Index
65.9
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED Dynamic AMOLED
Size 6.67 inches 6.7 inches
Resolution 1220 x 2712 pixels 1080 x 2340 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
PPI 446 ppi 385 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (30-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 600 nits 1300 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 2600 nits 1900 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz -
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 5 Gorilla Glass Victus Plus
Screen-to-body ratio 87.5% 88%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space 98.6% 100%
PWM 120 Hz 120 Hz
Response time 1 ms 2 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
1256 nits
1372 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 162.2 mm (6.39 inches) 162 mm (6.38 inches)
Width 75.7 mm (2.98 inches) 77.3 mm (3.04 inches)
Thickness 8.49 mm (0.33 inches) 8 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 197 g (6.95 oz) 213 g (7.51 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP68
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Plastic Metal
Colors Black, Blue, Green Black, Gray, Blue, Green, Yellow
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.11/5)
Drop resistance - Excellent (A) · 270 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
87.5%
88%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi 13T and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultra Samsung Exynos 2400e
Max clock 3100 MHz 3110 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 10 (1 + 2 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex A55
- 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex A78
- 1 core at 3.1 GHz: Cortex A78
- 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 2 cores at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.11 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 4 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 580 Yes
GPU
Graphics Mali-G610 MC6 Xclipse 940
GPU shading units 384 768
GPU clock 950 MHz 1095 MHz
FLOPS ~729.6 GFLOPS ~3406.8 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi 13T and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
1261
2045
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
4018
6397
Compute Score (GPU)
3492
16611
Compute Score (GPU) 3492 16611
Single-core score 1261 2045
Multi-core score 4018 6397
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
1175951
1977269
CPU 421303 675682
GPU 209708 670589
Memory 221082 229976
UX 323858 401022
Total score 1175951 1977269
Samples [9 tests] [55 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
1769
Stability 91% 70%
Graphics test 4 FPS 13 FPS
Graphics score 577 1769
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test - 29 FPS
Section 1 - 35 FPS
Section 2 - 28 FPS
Section 3 - 24 FPS
Graphics score - 7699
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
13055
16227
Web score 11689 15997
Video editing 6802 8031
Photo editing 23185 33878
Data manipulation 12111 12347
Writing score 17261 19836

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi 13T
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-12 (Kubyshko)AnTuTu 111130854
📘 2026-07-23 (Maragidyne)AnTuTu 111291153
📘 2026-06-27 (Gadfiq)AnTuTu 111287453
📘 2026-06-15 (notmihnea1)Geekbench 6 CPU1346 / 4133
📘 2026-01-15 (DQP)AnTuTu 111169170
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-12 -> bo177575AnTuTu 122370118
📘 2026-10-12 (Abs)AnTuTu 112053895
📘 2026-09-21 (Vishnu)AnTuTu 122276561
📘 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShCPU Throttle81%
📘 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShAnTuTu 122134029

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
Memory clock 3200 MHz 4200 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM HyperOS 2.0 One UI 8.0
OS size - 23.5 GB
OS updates 4 years 4 years
Security updates 5 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 5000 mAh 4700 mAh
Max charge power 67 W 25 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No Yes (15 W)
Reverse charging No Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging - No
Fast charging Yes (70% in 30 min) Yes (56% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:51 hr 1:10 hr
Battery cycles - 2000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 09:04 hr 07:20 hr
Watching video 12:58 hr 13:33 hr
Gaming 05:38 hr 05:11 hr
Standby 121 hr 129 hr
General battery life
23:22 hr
23:02 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8160 x 6120
Zoom Optical, 2x Optical, 3x
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 120FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 960 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens - 123°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 8 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.8
Focal length 24 mm 24 mm
Sensor Sony IMX707 Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN3
Sensor size 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) 1/1.57" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1.22 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/2.4
Focal length 50 mm 75 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV50D40 OmniVision OV08A10
Sensor size 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) 1/4.4" (≈ 0.23 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron 1 micron
Stabilization Digital Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 12 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm 13 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV13B Samsung S5K3L6
Sensor size 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch) 1/3.0" (≈ 0.33 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
136
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 65 60
Preview 65 69
Zoom 101 126
Samples Photo samples of Xiaomi 13T from DxOMark Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S24 FE from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 20 megapixels 10 megapixels
Image resolution 5184 x 3888 3648 x 2736
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.4
Focal length 26 mm 26 mm
Sensor Sony IMX596 Samsung S5K3J1
Sensor size 1/2" (≈ 0.5 inch) 1/2.65" (≈ 0.38 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 1.22 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort - Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Depends on the region Yes
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* - 20
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
91.4 dB
91.9 dB

Other

Category Mid-range Flagship
Announced September 2023 September 2024
Release date September 2023 October 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $600 $649
Successor - Xiaomi 15T - Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
SAR (head) - 0.86 W/kg
SAR (body) - 1.29 W/kg
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 67 W Not included
Further details
Notes on Galaxy S24 FE:
    - The 128 GB variant features UFS 3.1 memory, other models have UFS 4.0.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
10 (30.3%)
23 (69.7%)
Total votes: 33

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!