Xiaomi 14 Ultra vs Vivo X200 Pro
80
out of 100
VS
84
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.73-inch Xiaomi 14 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3) that was released on February 22, 2024, against the Vivo X200 Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9400 and came out 8 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 14 Ultra
- The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
- Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
- 15% higher pixel density (522 vs 452 PPI)
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 Pro
- Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Delivers 59% higher peak brightness (2039 against 1280 nits)
- Shows 13% longer battery life (24:55 vs 22:08 hours)
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- 20% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2825K versus 2354K)
- 23% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2686 and 2189 points
- The phone is 8 months newer
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.73 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels | 1260 x 2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 522 ppi | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 3000 nits | 2000 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | - | 4500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Screen protection | Xiaomi Shield Glass | Armor Glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | 90.1% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 98.9% | - |
| PWM | 120 Hz | - |
| Response time | 1 ms | - |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | - |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 161.4 mm (6.35 inches) | 162.36 mm (6.39 inches) |
| Width | 75.3 mm (2.96 inches) | 75.92 mm (2.99 inches) |
| Thickness | 9.2 mm (0.36 inches) | 8.49 mm (0.33 inches) |
| Weight | 219.8 g (7.75 oz) | 228 g (8.04 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black | White, Black, Gray, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| Max clock | 3300 MHz | 3620 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.62 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | MediaTek NPU 890 |
| Graphics | Adreno 750 | Immortalis-G925 MC12 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 903-1000 MHz | 1612 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~2774 GFLOPS | ~4952.1 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 16435 | 21444 |
| Single-core score | 2189 | 2686 |
| Multi-core score | 7596 | 8366 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 691662 | 900074 |
| GPU | 815122 | 972096 |
| Memory | 327096 | 345330 |
| UX | 520268 | 607687 |
| Total score | 2354148 | 2825187 |
| Samples | [6 tests] | [22 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 87% | 61% |
| Graphics test | 11 FPS | 18 FPS |
| Graphics score | 1503 | 2371 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 29 FPS | 40 FPS |
| Section 1 | 32 FPS | 44 FPS |
| Section 2 | 29 FPS | 41 FPS |
| Section 3 | 25 FPS | 34 FPS |
| Graphics score | 7556 | 10432 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | 83% | 65% |
| Graphics test | 27 FPS | 36 FPS |
| Graphics score | 4553 | 6122 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 14956 | 13701 |
| Video editing | 7926 | 5803 |
| Photo editing | 32564 | 35653 |
| Data manipulation | 15766 | 13567 |
| Writing score | 19505 | 23556 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (185th and 133rd place)
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-10-11 (Louu) | AnTuTu 12 | 2656851 |
| 📘 2026-10-07 (# Rodion) | AnTuTu 12 | 2576231 |
| 📘 2026-10-04 -> purt | Geekbench 7 GPU | 10162 |
| 📘 2026-10-04 -> purt | Geekbench 7 CPU | 1668 / 5549 |
| 📘 2026-09-28 (zloy) | AnTuTu 12 | 2576231 |
Vivo X200 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-12 (Oussama barhmate) | AnTuTu 12 | 3135000 |
| 📘 2026-08-01 -> Dlack | AnTuTu 11 | 2847396 |
| 📘 2026-08-01 (Dlack) | AnTuTu 11 | 2847396 |
| 📘 2026-07-31 (Xarvis) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 23591 |
| 📘 2026-07-31 (Xarvis) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2432 / 8113 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 4200 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | HyperOS 3 | Funtouch OS 16 |
| OS size | 31 GB | - |
| OS updates | 4 years | 3 years |
| Security updates | 5 years | 3 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 90 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (80 W) | Yes (30 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes |
| Bypass charging | - | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (52% in 15 min) | Yes (73% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:34 hr | 0:46 hr |
| Web browsing | 09:23 hr | 12:47 hr |
| Watching video | 12:26 hr | 16:41 hr |
| Gaming | 04:35 hr | 07:44 hr |
| Standby | 109 hr | 85 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 5x | Optical, 3.7x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 120FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 1920 FPS (1080p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 122° | 119° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Telephoto: 50 MP 4) Ultrawide: 50 MP 5) Depth |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 200 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 - 4.0 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-900 | Sony LYT-818 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.0" (≈ 1 inch) | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.6 micron | 1.22 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.7 |
| Focal length | 120 mm | 85 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX858 | Samsung ISOCELL HP9 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.51" (≈ 0.4 inch) | 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 0.56 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 12 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX858 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.51" (≈ 0.4 inch) | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 75 | - |
| Preview | 83 | - |
| Zoom | 160 | - |
| Samples | Photo samples of Xiaomi 14 Ultra from DxOMark | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6528 x 4896 | 6528 x 4896 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 22 mm | 20 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV32B | Samsung S5KKD1 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.14" (≈ 0.32 inch) | 1/3.42" (≈ 0.29 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes, DP 1.2 | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 20 | - |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | February 2024 | October 2024 |
| Release date | February 2024 | October 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | $847 |
| Successor | - Xiaomi 17 Ultra | - Vivo X300 Pro |
| Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 90 W | Yes, 90 W |
Further details
Notes on 14 Ultra:
- The rear cover is available in glass or eco-leather, while the frame can be aluminum or titanium.
- The front glass is either Xiaomi Shield Glass or Xiaomi Longjing Glass.
Notes on X200 Pro:
- The black model is thinner (8.2 mm) and lighter (223g).
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the performance, gaming, and battery life are more important to you, then choose the Vivo X200 Pro. But if the software and sound are more of a priority – go for the Xiaomi 14 Ultra.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 274
Related comparisons
10.
Vivo X200 Pro vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra (6)
