Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Honor Magic 7 Pro

77 out of 100
Xiaomi 14T Pro
VS
86 out of 100
Honor Magic 7 Pro

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.67-inch Xiaomi 14T Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus) that was released on September 26, 2024, against the Honor Magic 7 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 14T Pro
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 100W)
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
Reasons to consider the Honor Magic 7 Pro
  • Shows 18% longer battery life (26:42 vs 22:36 hours)
  • Better camera quality (According to DxOMark rating)
  • The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Comes with 850 mAh larger battery capacity: 5850 vs 5000 mAh
  • 32% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3014K versus 2283K)
  • Delivers 24% higher peak brightness (1526 against 1234 nits)
  • Reverse charging feature
  • 39% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3051 and 2189 points

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi 14T Pro and Honor Magic 7 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
62.4
(Average)
Value Index
37.7
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.67 inches 6.8 inches
Resolution 1220 x 2712 pixels 1280 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
PPI 446 ppi 453 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (30-144 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1600 nits 1600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 4000 nits 5000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz 360 Hz
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 5 NanoCrystal Shield
Screen-to-body ratio 89.1% 90.5%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.8% 99.8%
PWM 120 Hz 360 Hz
Response time 1 ms 1 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
1234 nits
1526 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 160.4 mm (6.31 inches) 162.7 mm (6.41 inches)
Width 75.1 mm (2.96 inches) 77.1 mm (3.04 inches)
Thickness 8.39 mm (0.33 inches) 8.8 mm (0.35 inches)
Weight 209 g (7.37 oz) 223 g (7.87 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Gray, Blue White, Black, Gray, Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.63/5)
Drop resistance - Good (C) · 90 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
89.1%
90.5%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi 14T Pro and Honor Magic 7 Pro
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Max clock 3400 MHz 4320 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 790 Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 Adreno 830
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi 14T Pro and Honor Magic 7 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2189
3051
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
7225
8977
Compute Score (GPU)
15328
18499
Compute Score (GPU) 15328 18499
Single-core score 2189 3051
Multi-core score 7225 8977
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
2283895
3014433
CPU 673218 890143
GPU 736798 1168623
Memory 356904 371223
UX 516975 584444
Total score 2283895 3014433
Samples [33 tests] [15 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
1444
2482
Stability 73% 62%
Graphics test 11 FPS 18 FPS
Graphics score 1444 2482
3DMark Solar Bay
6407
11409
Graphics test 24 FPS 43 FPS
Section 1 26 FPS 49 FPS
Section 2 25 FPS 44 FPS
Section 3 22 FPS 37 FPS
Graphics score 6407 11409
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
15414
20701
Web score 16838 24937
Video editing 6565 8080
Photo editing 26141 41656
Data manipulation 15968 16836
Writing score 18342 26740
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#112th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi 14T Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-07 (wrongalik)AnTuTu 122479097
📘 2026-09-24 -> NFS6410AnTuTu 122626976
📘 2026-09-24 (Thành)AnTuTu 122400294
📘 2026-08-09 (Mouh_ch)AnTuTu 112262635
📘 2026-07-27 (Phil)AnTuTu 112119407
Honor Magic 7 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-05 -> swag420AnTuTu 123135800
📘 2026-07-28 (Hyenasher)Geekbench 6 CPU3051 / 8977
📘 2026-07-08 (Jason)AnTuTu 113112895
📘 2026-06-20 -> SangAnTuTu 113014433
📘 2026-06-19 -> SangAnTuTu 113007761

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 4800 MHz 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM HyperOS 3 MagicOS 10
OS size 50 GB 30.2 GB
OS updates 4 years 7 years
Security updates 5 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 5000 mAh 5850 mAh
Max charge power 120 W 100 W
Battery type Li-Po Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) Yes (80 W)
Reverse charging No Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging No Yes
Fast charging Yes (74% in 15 min) Yes (90% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:23 hr 0:36 hr
Battery cycles - 1200 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 10:46 hr 13:07 hr
Watching video 14:07 hr 16:11 hr
Gaming 05:33 hr 06:20 hr
Standby 92 hr 109 hr
General battery life
22:36 hr
26:42 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 2.6x Optical, 3x
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 120° 122°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.6 f/1.4 - 2.0
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor Omnivision Light Fusion 900 Omnivision OV50H
Sensor size 1/1.31" (≈ 0.76 inch) 1/1.3" (≈ 0.77 inch)
Pixel size 1.2 micron 1.2 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.6
Focal length 60 mm 60 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Samsung ISOCELL S5KHP3
Sensor size 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron 0.56 micron
Stabilization Digital Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 12 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 15 mm 12 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV13B Omnivision OV50D
Sensor size 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch) 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 0.61 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
129
147
Video quality
138
150
Generic main camera score
135
148
Bokeh 55 160
Preview 67 -
Zoom 144 150
Samples Photo samples of Xiaomi 14T Pro from DxOMark Photo samples of Honor Magic 7 Pro from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 6560 x 4928 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 25 mm 21 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5KKD1 Sony IMX816
Sensor size 1/3.44" (≈ 0.29 inch) 1/2.93" (≈ 0.34 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 0.6 micron
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No Yes

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No Yes, DP 1.2
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
14T Pro +3%
92.1 dB
89.3 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced September 2024 October 2024
Release date September 2024 November 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $579 $1100
Successor - Xiaomi 15T Pro - Honor Magic 8 Pro
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Face recognition sensor
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 100 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Honor Magic 7 Pro is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
28 (43.1%)
37 (56.9%)
Total votes: 65

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!