Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Vivo iQOO 13

77 out of 100
Xiaomi 14T Pro
VS
85 out of 100
Vivo iQOO 13

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.67-inch Xiaomi 14T Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus) that was released on September 26, 2024, against the Vivo iQOO 13, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 14T Pro
  • Handles wireless charging up to 50W
  • The rear camera has a 2.6x optical zoom
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO 13
  • Shows 35% longer battery life (30:28 vs 22:36 hours)
  • Comes with 1150 mAh larger battery capacity: 6150 vs 5000 mAh
  • 38% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3150K versus 2283K)
  • Delivers 47% higher peak brightness (1793 against 1222 nits)
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • 14% higher pixel density (510 vs 446 PPI)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
  • 37% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3008 and 2189 points

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi 14T Pro and Vivo iQOO 13 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
79
78*
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
77
85*
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
62.4
(Average)
Value Index
60.5
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.67 inches 6.82 inches
Resolution 1220 x 2712 pixels 1440 x 3168 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 446 ppi 510 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (30-144 Hz) Yes (1-144 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1600 nits 1800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 4000 nits 4500 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz 360 Hz
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 5 Schott Xensation Alpha
Screen-to-body ratio 89.1% 89.6%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.8% -
PWM 120 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto)
1222 nits
iQOO 13 +47%
1793 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 160.4 mm (6.31 inches) 163.37 mm (6.43 inches)
Width 75.1 mm (2.96 inches) 76.71 mm (3.02 inches)
Thickness 8.39 mm (0.33 inches) 8.13 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 209 g (7.37 oz) 213 g (7.51 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Gray, Blue White, Black, Silver, Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
89.1%
iQOO 13 +1%
89.6%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi 14T Pro and Vivo iQOO 13
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Max clock 3400 MHz 4320 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 790 Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 Adreno 830
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi 14T Pro and Vivo iQOO 13
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2189
iQOO 13 +37%
3008
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
7225
iQOO 13 +29%
9297
Compute Score (GPU)
15328
iQOO 13 +62%
24763
Compute Score (GPU) 15328 24763
Single-core score 2189 3008
Multi-core score 7225 9297
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
2283895
iQOO 13 +38%
3150555
CPU 673218 903944
GPU 736798 1153744
Memory 356904 415491
UX 516975 677376
Total score 2283895 3150555
Samples [33 tests] [33 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
1444
iQOO 13 +74%
2509
Stability 73% 77%
Graphics test 11 FPS 19 FPS
Graphics score 1444 2509
3DMark Solar Bay
6407
iQOO 13 +79%
11463
Graphics test 24 FPS 44 FPS
Section 1 26 FPS 49 FPS
Section 2 25 FPS 44 FPS
Section 3 22 FPS 37 FPS
Graphics score 6407 11463
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
n/a
6250
Graphics test - 37 FPS
Graphics score - 6250
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
15414
iQOO 13 +2%
15763
Web score 16838 14234
Video editing 6565 6801
Photo editing 26141 39527
Data manipulation 15968 13253
Writing score 18342 20704

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi 14T Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-14 (Эрекозе)AnTuTu 122309584
📘 2026-10-07 (wrongalik)AnTuTu 122479097
📘 2026-09-24 -> NFS6410AnTuTu 122626976
📘 2026-09-24 (Thành)AnTuTu 122400294
📘 2026-08-09 (Mouh_ch)AnTuTu 112262635
Vivo iQOO 13
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-02 (Fenix)AnTuTu 123392682
📘 2026-09-25 (Asuna)AnTuTu 113203192
📘 2026-09-24 (Fenix)AnTuTu 123343403
📘 2026-08-15 (Kh)AnTuTu 113166164
📘 2026-08-03 (ShiNo_Maebure)AnTuTu 113090760

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 4800 MHz 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM HyperOS 3 Funtouch 16
OS size 50 GB -
OS updates 4 years 4 years
Security updates 5 years 5 years

Battery

Capacity 5000 mAh 6150 mAh
Max charge power 120 W 120 W
Battery type Li-Po Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) No
Reverse charging No No
Bypass charging No No
Fast charging Yes (74% in 15 min) Yes (91% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:23 hr 0:32 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 10:46 hr 14:22 hr
Watching video 14:07 hr 17:57 hr
Gaming 05:33 hr 08:12 hr
Standby 92 hr 129 hr
General battery life
22:36 hr
iQOO 13 +35%
30:28 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 2.6x Optical, 2x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 960 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 120° 119°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.6 f/1.9
Focal length 23 mm 23 mm
Sensor Omnivision Light Fusion 900 Sony IMX921
Sensor size 1/1.31" (≈ 0.76 inch) 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1.2 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/1.9
Focal length 60 mm 50 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Sony IMX816
Sensor size 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) 1/2.51" (≈ 0.4 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Digital Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 12 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 15 mm 15 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV13B Samsung S5KJN1
Sensor size 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
129
n/a
Video quality
138
n/a
Generic main camera score
135
n/a
Bokeh 55 -
Preview 67 -
Zoom 144 -
Samples Photo samples of Xiaomi 14T Pro from DxOMark -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 6560 x 4928 6528 x 4896
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length 25 mm 28 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5KKD1 GalaxyCore GC32E1
Sensor size 1/3.44" (≈ 0.29 inch) 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 0.7 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
92.1 dB
n/a

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced September 2024 October 2024
Release date September 2024 November 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $579 $650
Successor - Xiaomi 15T Pro - Vivo iQOO 15
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 120 W
Further details
Notes on iQOO 13:
    - Only the 16/512 GB variant has UFS 4.1 storage; the rest use UFS 4.0.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo iQOO 13 is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
30 (19.9%)
121 (80.1%)
Total votes: 151

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!