Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Vivo X200 Pro mini
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.67-inch Xiaomi 14T Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus) that was released on September 26, 2024, against the Vivo X200 Pro mini, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9400 and came out 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- Has a 0.36 inch larger screen size
- Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 90W)
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 Pro mini
- Shows 27% longer battery life (28:40 vs 22:36 hours)
- Delivers 48% higher peak brightness (1805 against 1222 nits)
- The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- Comes with 700 mAh larger battery capacity: 5700 vs 5000 mAh
- 22% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2779K versus 2283K)
- Reverse charging feature
- 29% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2819 and 2189 points
- Weighs 22 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 inches | 6.31 inches |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels | 1216 x 2640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 446 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (30-144 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1600 nits | - |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 4000 nits | 4500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 480 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.1% | 90.3% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.8% | 99.8% |
| PWM | 120 Hz | 361 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Screen space comparison
14T Pro
6.67″ (20:9 ratio) = 16.6 in2
X200 Pro mini
6.31″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.1 in2
~9% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 160.4 mm (6.31 inches) | 150.8 mm (5.94 inches) |
| Width | 75.1 mm (2.96 inches) | 71.8 mm (2.83 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.39 mm (0.33 inches) | 8.2 mm (0.32 inches) |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 187 g (6.6 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | - |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Gray, Blue | White, Black, Green, Pink |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| Max clock | 3400 MHz | 3630 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.62 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 12 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 790 | MediaTek NPU 890 |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 1612 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~4952.1 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 15328 | 22758 |
| Single-core score | 2189 | 2819 |
| Multi-core score | 7225 | 8705 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 673218 | 853223 |
| GPU | 736798 | 971718 |
| Memory | 356904 | 348906 |
| UX | 516975 | 605282 |
| Total score | 2283895 | 2779129 |
| Samples | [33 tests] | [14 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 73% | 62% |
| Graphics test | 11 FPS | 17 FPS |
| Graphics score | 1444 | 2283 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 24 FPS | 39 FPS |
| Section 1 | 26 FPS | 45 FPS |
| Section 2 | 25 FPS | 40 FPS |
| Section 3 | 22 FPS | 31 FPS |
| Graphics score | 6407 | 10156 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | - | 60% |
| Graphics test | - | 33 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 5665 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 16838 | 13655 |
| Video editing | 6565 | 5778 |
| Photo editing | 26141 | 30547 |
| Data manipulation | 15968 | 12752 |
| Writing score | 18342 | 22229 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#135th place)
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi 14T Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-10-14 (Эрекозе) | AnTuTu 12 | 2309584 |
| 📘 2026-10-07 (wrongalik) | AnTuTu 12 | 2479097 |
| 📘 2026-09-24 -> NFS6410 | AnTuTu 12 | 2626976 |
| 📘 2026-09-24 (Thành) | AnTuTu 12 | 2400294 |
| 📘 2026-08-09 (Mouh_ch) | AnTuTu 11 | 2262635 |
Vivo X200 Pro mini
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-30 -> Bronelliant | AnTuTu 12 | 2833803 |
| 📘 2026-06-09 (adverse) | AnTuTu 11 | 2857775 |
| 📘 2026-05-31 (elega) | AnTuTu 11 | 2810299 |
| 📘 2026-05-24 (Tape) | AnTuTu 11 | 2812729 |
| 📘 2026-05-07 (Oleg) | AnTuTu 11 | 2820364 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 4800 MHz | 5300 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | HyperOS 3 | OriginOS 6 |
| OS size | 50 GB | 55 GB |
| OS updates | 4 years | 3 years |
| Security updates | 5 years | 3 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 5700 mAh |
| Max charge power | 120 W | 90 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (30 W) |
| Reverse charging | No | Yes |
| Bypass charging | No | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (74% in 15 min) | Yes (62% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:23 hr | 0:52 hr |
| Web browsing | 10:46 hr | 11:58 hr |
| Watching video | 14:07 hr | 18:31 hr |
| Gaming | 05:33 hr | 05:59 hr |
| Standby | 92 hr | 131 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#72nd place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 2.6x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 120FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (1080p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 120° | 119° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision Light Fusion 900 | Sony LYT-818 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.31" (≈ 0.76 inch) | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.2 micron | 1.22 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | 60 mm | 70 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Sony IMX882 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) | 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.61 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Image resolution | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV13B | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch) | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 55 | - |
| Preview | 67 | - |
| Zoom | 144 | - |
| Samples | Photo samples of Xiaomi 14T Pro from DxOMark | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6560 x 4928 | 6528 x 4896 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 20 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL S5KKD1 | Samsung KD1 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.44" (≈ 0.29 inch) | 1/3.44" (≈ 0.29 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | September 2024 | October 2024 |
| Release date | September 2024 | October 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $579 | $649 |
| Successor | - Xiaomi 15T Pro | - |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 90 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the performance, gaming, battery life, and design are more important to you, then choose the Vivo X200 Pro mini. But if the connectivity, software, and sound are more of a priority – go for the Xiaomi 14T Pro.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 74
Related comparisons
6.
Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Xiaomi 14 (1)
8.
Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Xiaomi 14T (9)
10.
Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Xiaomi 15 (1)