Xiaomi 14T vs Realme GT 7 Pro

70 out of 100
Xiaomi 14T
VS
84 out of 100
Realme GT 7 Pro

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.67-inch Xiaomi 14T (with MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra) that was released on September 26, 2024, against the Realme GT 7 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 14T
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • Weighs 27.8 grams less
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
  • Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Realme GT 7 Pro
  • 2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3125K versus 1598K)
  • Shows 47% longer battery life (32:07 vs 21:55 hours)
  • Comes with 1500 mAh larger battery capacity: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
  • Delivers 72% higher peak brightness (2319 against 1349 nits)
  • The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 67W)
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • 2.2x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2995 and 1335 points

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi 14T and Realme GT 7 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
67.9
(Good)
Value Index
80.4
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.67 inches 6.78 inches
Resolution 1220 x 2712 pixels 1264 x 2780 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 446 ppi 450 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (30-144 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1600 nits 2000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 4000 nits 6500 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz 360 Hz
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 5 Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Screen-to-body ratio 89.1% 88.8%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.6% 99.8%
PWM 120 Hz 120 Hz
Response time 1 ms 1 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
1349 nits
GT 7 Pro +72%
2319 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 160.5 mm (6.32 inches) 162.5 mm (6.4 inches)
Width 75.1 mm (2.96 inches) 76.9 mm (3.03 inches)
Thickness 7.8 mm (0.31 inches) 8.6 mm (0.34 inches)
Weight 195 g (6.88 oz) 222.8 g (7.86 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Plastic Metal
Colors Black, Gray, Blue, Green White, Gray, Orange
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.59/5)
Drop resistance - Good (C) · 90 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
89.1%
88.8%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi 14T and Realme GT 7 Pro
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Max clock 3350 MHz 4320 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A510
- 3 cores at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-A715
- 1 core at 3.35 GHz: Cortex-A715
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
L3 cache 4 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 780 Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Mali G615 MP6 Adreno 830
GPU shading units 768 1536
GPU clock 1400 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~2150.4 GFLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi 14T and Realme GT 7 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
1335
GT 7 Pro +124%
2995
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
4107
GT 7 Pro +128%
9380
Compute Score (GPU)
8041
GT 7 Pro +202%
24257
Compute Score (GPU) 8041 24257
Single-core score 1335 2995
Multi-core score 4107 9380
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
1598339
GT 7 Pro +96%
3125854
CPU 498423 893166
GPU 410822 1098769
Memory 291621 443515
UX 397473 690404
Total score 1598339 3125854
Samples [25 tests] [12 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 97% -
Graphics test 6 FPS -
Graphics score 836 -
3DMark Solar Bay
3346
n/a
Graphics test 13 FPS -
Section 1 14 FPS -
Section 2 13 FPS -
Section 3 11 FPS -
Graphics score 3346 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi 14T
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-29 (Zen)AnTuTu 111670904
📘 2026-08-21 (FanzerNN)AnTuTu 111664804
📘 2026-07-28 (Chisa)AnTuTu 111620414
📘 2026-07-04 (Raze)AnTuTu 111611939
📘 2026-05-10 (Pasaribu)AnTuTu 111658131
Realme GT 7 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-06-16 (Awiewizz)AnTuTu 113125854
📘 2026-05-26 (tei0q)AnTuTu 113315538
📘 2026-05-11 (Neang1201)AnTuTu 113360878
📘 2026-04-23 (Vladisss)AnTuTu 113111924
📘 2026-02-02 (Santiijago)AnTuTu 113300025

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock - 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 15
ROM HyperOS 3 Realme UI 6.0
OS size 22 GB 58 GB
OS updates 4 years 3 years
Security updates 5 years 4 years

Battery

Capacity 5000 mAh 6500 mAh
Max charge power 67 W 120 W
Battery type Li-Po Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No No
Bypass charging No -
Fast charging Yes (72% in 30 min) Yes (58% in 15 min)
Full charging time 0:49 hr 0:35 hr
Battery cycles - 800 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 10:03 hr 16:09 hr
Watching video 13:20 hr 18:28 hr
Gaming 05:09 hr 07:48 hr
Standby 95 hr 132 hr
General battery life
21:55 hr
GT 7 Pro +47%
32:07 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 2x Optical, 3x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No Up to 24FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 120° 112°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/1.9
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor Sony IMX906 Sony IMX906
Sensor size 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/2.7
Focal length 50 mm 73 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Sony IMX882
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2" (≈ 0.5 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 12 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm 16 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV13B10 Sony IMX355
Sensor size 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch) 1/2.8" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.14 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 55 -
Preview 68 -
Zoom 140 -
Samples Photo samples of Xiaomi 14T from DxOMark -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 16 megapixels
Image resolution 6560 x 4928 4608 x 3456
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.5
Focal length 25 mm 24 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KKD1 Sony IMX480
Sensor size 1/3.44" (≈ 0.29 inch) 1/3.09" (≈ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 1 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
91.4 dB
89.9 dB

Other

Category Mid-range Flagship
Announced September 2024 November 2024
Release date September 2024 November 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $549 $800
Successor - Xiaomi 15T - Realme GT 8 Pro
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 120 W
Further details
Notes on Xiaomi 14T:
    - The eco-leather version is thicker at 7.95 mm but lighter, weighing 193 grams.
    - The titanium version features a back panel protected by Panda X glass. The green model comes with an eco-leather back.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Realme GT 7 Pro is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
12 (48%)
13 (52%)
Total votes: 25

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!