Xiaomi 15 vs Honor 400 Pro
Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.36-inch Xiaomi 15 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) that was released on October 29, 2024, against the Honor 400 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and came out 7 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 15
- Shows 30% longer battery life (31:54 vs 24:36 hours)
- 37% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3076K versus 2243K)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- 39% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2940 and 2109 points
Reasons to consider the Honor 400 Pro
- The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- Has a 0.34 inch larger screen size
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
- The phone is 7 months newer
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.36 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2670 pixels | 1280 x 2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 460 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1500 nits | 1500 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3200 nits | 5000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Xiaomi Shield Glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.1% | 90% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.5% | - |
| PWM | 120 Hz | - |
| Response time | 1 ms | - |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | - |
Screen space comparison
400 Pro
6.7″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 17.1 in2
Xiaomi 15
6.36″ (20:9 ratio) = 15.1 in2
~12% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 152.3 mm (6 inches) | 160.8 mm (6.33 inches) |
| Width | 71.2 mm (2.8 inches) | 76.1 mm (3 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.08 mm (0.32 inches) | 8.1 mm (0.32 inches) |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | White, Black, Silver, Green, Purple | Black, Gray, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Average (2.61/5) | Good (3.61/5) |
| Drop resistance | Good (C) · 90 drops | Excellent (A) · 270 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Max clock | 4320 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M) - 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L) |
- 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 12 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 830 | Adreno 750 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1100 MHz | 903-1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3379.2 GFLOPS | ~2774 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 24715 | 14352 |
| Single-core score | 2940 | 2109 |
| Multi-core score | 9243 | 6695 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 946469 | 702885 |
| GPU | 1118762 | 723128 |
| Memory | 372907 | 332058 |
| UX | 638041 | 485733 |
| Total score | 3076179 | 2243804 |
| Samples | [32 tests] | [24 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 82% | 75% |
| Graphics test | 16 FPS | 11 FPS |
| Graphics score | 2204 | 1492 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 39 FPS | 29 FPS |
| Section 1 | 43 FPS | 32 FPS |
| Section 2 | 39 FPS | 29 FPS |
| Section 3 | 33 FPS | 25 FPS |
| Graphics score | 10153 | 7535 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | 89% | - |
| Graphics test | 34 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 5782 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 18558 | 17920 |
| Video editing | 8103 | 7685 |
| Photo editing | 37685 | 29553 |
| Data manipulation | 13755 | 14371 |
| Writing score | 21293 | 17125 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#99th place)
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi 15
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-10-10 (artyashka) | AnTuTu 12 | 3263798 |
| 📘 2026-09-28 (PenPen) | AnTuTu 12 | 3242949 |
| 📘 2026-08-24 (zaido) | AnTuTu 11 | 3236909 |
| 📘 2026-08-16 (jakisgood) | AnTuTu 11 | 3007116 |
| 📘 2026-08-03 (abdurashidovvv) | AnTuTu 11 | 3102543 |
Honor 400 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-09 (Lunka) | AnTuTu 11 | 2094129 |
| 📘 2026-09-01 (Maska) | AnTuTu 11 | 2163688 |
| 📘 2026-07-07 -> naufall | AnTuTu 11 | 2162598 |
| 📘 2026-06-28 (f0NES1k) | AnTuTu 11 | 2306681 |
| 📘 2026-06-10 (Zhan) | AnTuTu 11 | 2206753 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory clock | 5300 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | HyperOS 3.0 | MagicOS 10 |
| OS size | 21 GB | - |
| OS updates | 4 years | 6 years |
| Security updates | 5 years | 6 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 5400 mAh | 5300 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | No | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (83% in 30 min) | Yes (93% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:45 hr | 0:38 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1000 cycles | 1200 cycles |
| Web browsing | 13:20 hr | 10:11 hr |
| Watching video | 19:22 hr | 14:23 hr |
| Gaming | 07:10 hr | 06:01 hr |
| Standby | 150 hr | 118 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#30th place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 200 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 16384 x 12288 |
| Zoom | Optical, 2.6x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 1920 FPS (720p) | - |
| Angle of widest lens | 115° | 112° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP 4) Depth: 2 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | - |
| Sensor | OmniVision Light Fusion 900 | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.31" (≈ 0.76 inch) | 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.2 micron | 0.56 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 60 mm | 68 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | Sony IMX856 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/2" (≈ 0.5 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 14 mm | 16 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 75 | - |
| Preview | 87 | - |
| Zoom | 152 | - |
| Samples | Photo samples of Xiaomi 15 from DxOMark | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6528 x 4896 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | 22 mm | - |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV32B | - |
| Sensor size | 1/3.14" (≈ 0.32 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | October 2024 | May 2025 |
| Release date | October 2024 | May 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $945 | $799 |
| Successor | - Xiaomi 17 | - Honor 500 Pro |
| Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 90 W | Yes, 100 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi 15 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 86
Related comparisons
7.
Xiaomi 15 vs Xiaomi 14 (2)
9.
Xiaomi 15 vs Xiaomi 14T Pro (1)
10.
Xiaomi 15 vs Vivo X200 Pro mini (1)