Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro vs Honor 400

68 out of 100
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
VS
69 out of 100
Honor 400

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.67-inch Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2) that was released on May 23, 2024, against the Honor 400, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 and came out 1 year after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
  • 62% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1767K versus 1087K)
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 80W)
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • 14% higher pixel density (526 vs 460 PPI)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • 69% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1916 and 1136 points
Reasons to consider the Honor 400
  • Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Shows 22% longer battery life (23:16 vs 19:08 hours)
  • Delivers 28% higher peak brightness (1541 against 1200 nits)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • Water-resistant body (IP66 classification)
  • The phone is 1 year newer
  • Reverse charging feature
  • Weighs 25 grams less
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro and Honor 400 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 256 GB
77.2
(Good)
Value Index
53.2
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.67 inches 6.55 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3200 pixels 1264 x 2736 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
PPI 526 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes
Max rated brightness - 1600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 4000 nits 5000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz 240 Hz
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 5 Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 89.1% 90.2%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.5% -
PWM 120 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto)
1200 nits
Honor 400 +28%
1541 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 160.86 mm (6.33 inches) 156.5 mm (6.16 inches)
Width 74.95 mm (2.95 inches) 74.6 mm (2.94 inches)
Thickness 8.21 mm (0.32 inches) 7.3 mm (0.29 inches)
Weight 209 g (7.37 oz) 184 g (6.49 oz)
Waterproof IP54 IP66
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Plastic
Frame material Metal Plastic
Colors White, Black Black, Silver, Gold, Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.63/5)
Drop resistance - Very good (B) Β· 180 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
89.1%
Honor 400 +1%
90.2%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro and Honor 400
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
Max clock 3200 MHz 2630 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 2 + 2 + 3) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 3 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A510
- 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A710
- 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A715
- 1 core at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-X3
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510)
- 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715)
- 1 core at 2.63 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715)
L3 cache 8 MB 3 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Yes
GPU
Graphics Adreno 740 Adreno 720
GPU shading units 1536 512
GPU clock 680 MHz 975 MHz
FLOPS ~2089 GFLOPS ~998.4 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro and Honor 400
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
1916
1136
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
5305
3107
Compute Score (GPU)
Poco F6 Pro +112%
8609
4060
Compute Score (GPU) 8609 4060
Single-core score 1916 1136
Multi-core score 5305 3107
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
1767128
1087525
CPU 573925 403084
GPU 430773 207834
Memory 319179 216538
UX 443251 260069
Total score 1767128 1087525
Samples [21 tests] [32 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 95% -
Graphics test 7 FPS -
Graphics score 996 -
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 18 FPS -
Section 1 21 FPS -
Section 2 18 FPS -
Section 3 16 FPS -
Graphics score 4833 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-03 (Fraeier)AnTuTu 111779881
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (bySK1LL)AnTuTu 121974839
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-25 (kyryl)AnTuTu 111827319
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (Ploxou)AnTuTu 111769525
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-16 (TsukuGuru)AnTuTu 111751309
Honor 400
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-11 (Bro)AnTuTu 12956529
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-11 (Baclaven)AnTuTu 11947758
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-15 (Iulitic211Rg)AnTuTu 111102591
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-04 (TheOdin)AnTuTu 111098513
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-08 (brozzlex)AnTuTu 111089031

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory clock 4200 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM HyperOS 3 MagicOS 10
OS updates 2 years 6 years
Security updates 2 years 6 years

Battery

Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
Max charge power 120 W 80 W
Battery type Li-Po Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No Yes
Bypass charging No Yes
Fast charging Yes (64% in 15 min) Yes (80% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:27 hr 0:41 hr
Battery cycles - 1200 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 07:12 hr 09:20 hr
Watching video 09:49 hr 12:17 hr
Gaming 05:17 hr 05:43 hr
Standby 103 hr 121 hr
General battery life
19:08 hr
Honor 400 +22%
23:16 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 200 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 16384 x 12288
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 24FPS No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 1920 FPS (720p) -
Angle of widest lens - 112Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
3) Macro: 2 MP
1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Ultrawide: 12 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/1.6 f/1.9
Sensor OmniVision OVX8000 Samsung ISOCELL HP3
Sensor size 1/1.55" (β‰ˆ 0.65 inch) 1/1.4" (β‰ˆ 0.71 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 0.56 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 16 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX355 -
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Stabilization Digital Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution 2 MP -
Aperture f/2.4 -
Focal length 25 mm -
Sensor GalaxyCore GC02M1 -
Sensor size 1/5.0" (β‰ˆ 0.2 inch) -
Pixel size 1.75 micron -
Stabilization Digital -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 16 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 4608 x 3456 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.0
Focal length 24 mm -
Sensor Omnivision OV16A1Q CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.06" (β‰ˆ 0.33 inch) -
Pixel size 1 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* 20 -
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
88.7 dB
n/a

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced May 2024 May 2025
Release date May 2024 May 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $499 $499
Successor - Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro - Honor 500
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 120 W Yes, 100 W
Further details
Notes on Poco F6 Pro:
    - The Chinese version of this phone released under Redmi K70 name.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the camera and battery life are more important to you, then choose the Honor 400. But if the performance, gaming, and sound are more of a priority – go for the Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
12 (70.6%)
5 (29.4%)
Total votes: 17

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!