Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro vs Honor 400 Pro
79
out of 100
VS
80
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.67-inch Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3) that was released on March 27, 2025, against the Honor 400 Pro, which is powered by the same chip and came out 2 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
- Shows 16% longer battery life (28:39 vs 24:36 hours)
- Comes with 700 mAh larger battery capacity: 6000 vs 5300 mAh
- 14% higher pixel density (526 vs 460 PPI)
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
Reasons to consider the Honor 400 Pro
- The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
- Handles wireless charging up to 50W
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
- The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels | 1280 x 2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 526 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | 1500 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3200 nits | 5000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 480 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | 90% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.4% | - |
| PWM | 120 Hz | - |
| Response time | 1 ms | - |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | - |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 160.26 mm (6.31 inches) | 160.8 mm (6.33 inches) |
| Width | 74.95 mm (2.95 inches) | 76.1 mm (3 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.12 mm (0.32 inches) | 8.1 mm (0.32 inches) |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | Black, Silver, Blue | Black, Gray, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Average (2.61/5) | Good (3.61/5) |
| Drop resistance | Good (C) · 90 drops | Excellent (A) · 270 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Max clock | 3300 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 750 | Adreno 750 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 903-1000 MHz | 903-1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~2774 GFLOPS | ~2774 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 17029 | 14352 |
| Single-core score | 2209 | 2109 |
| Multi-core score | 6642 | 6695 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 662841 | 702885 |
| GPU | 780484 | 723128 |
| Memory | 345533 | 332058 |
| UX | 512354 | 485733 |
| Total score | 2301212 | 2243804 |
| Samples | [33 tests] | [24 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 82% | 75% |
| Graphics test | 11 FPS | 11 FPS |
| Graphics score | 1506 | 1492 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| Section 1 | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| Section 2 | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| Section 3 | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| Graphics score | 7581 | 7535 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 16536 | 17920 |
| Video editing | 7905 | 7685 |
| Photo editing | 31248 | 29553 |
| Data manipulation | 14260 | 14371 |
| Writing score | 19168 | 17125 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#198th place)
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-10-02 (fx) | AnTuTu 12 | 2392357 |
| 📘 2026-09-30 (EA Fran) | AnTuTu 12 | 2452758 |
| 📘 2026-09-29 -> Alejandro Sorin | AnTuTu 12 | 2597186 |
| 📘 2026-09-16 (Jepp) | AnTuTu 12 | 2526342 |
| 📘 2026-07-05 -> Alejandro Sorin | AnTuTu 11 | 2301212 |
Honor 400 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-09 (Lunka) | AnTuTu 11 | 2094129 |
| 📘 2026-09-01 (Maska) | AnTuTu 11 | 2163688 |
| 📘 2026-07-07 -> naufall | AnTuTu 11 | 2162598 |
| 📘 2026-06-28 (f0NES1k) | AnTuTu 11 | 2306681 |
| 📘 2026-06-10 (Zhan) | AnTuTu 11 | 2206753 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory clock | 4800 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | HyperOS 3.0 | MagicOS 10 |
| OS size | 27.9 GB | - |
| OS updates | 6 years | 6 years |
| Security updates | 6 years | 6 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6000 mAh | 5300 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | No | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 16 min) | Yes (93% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:37 hr | 0:38 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1000 cycles | 1200 cycles |
| Web browsing | 13:00 hr | 10:11 hr |
| Watching video | 14:33 hr | 14:23 hr |
| Gaming | 06:14 hr | 06:01 hr |
| Standby | 141 hr | 118 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#73rd place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 200 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 16384 x 12288 |
| Zoom | Digital, 20x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 24FPS | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 1920 FPS (720p) | - |
| Angle of widest lens | - | 112° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP 4) Depth: 2 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | - |
| Sensor | OmniVision OVX8000 | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.55" (≈ 0.65 inch) | 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 0.56 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | - | 50 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | - | 68 mm |
| Sensor | - | Sony IMX856 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/2" (≈ 0.5 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.8 micron |
| Stabilization | - | Optical |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 16 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV08D | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 20 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | - |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV20B | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | March 2025 | May 2025 |
| Release date | April 2025 | May 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $799 |
| Successor | - Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | - Honor 500 Pro |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 100 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the camera and connectivity are more important to you, then choose the Honor 400 Pro. But if the battery life and sound are more of a priority – go for the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 188