Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 13

79 out of 100
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
VS
85 out of 100
Vivo iQOO 13

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.67-inch Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3) that was released on March 27, 2025, against the Vivo iQOO 13, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 5 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
  • Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
  • Reverse charging feature
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO 13
  • The rear camera has a 2x optical zoom
  • 37% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3150K versus 2301K)
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 90W)
  • Delivers 22% higher peak brightness (1793 against 1468 nits)
  • 36% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3008 and 2209 points
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro and Vivo iQOO 13 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
71.7
(Good)
Value Index
60.5
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.67 inches 6.82 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3200 pixels 1440 x 3168 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 526 ppi 510 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (1-144 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1800 nits 1800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3200 nits 4500 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz 360 Hz
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 7i Schott Xensation Alpha
Screen-to-body ratio 89.4% 89.6%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.4% -
PWM 120 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto)
1468 nits
iQOO 13 +22%
1793 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 160.26 mm (6.31 inches) 163.37 mm (6.43 inches)
Width 74.95 mm (2.95 inches) 76.71 mm (3.02 inches)
Thickness 8.12 mm (0.32 inches) 8.13 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 206 g (7.27 oz) 213 g (7.51 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Silver, Blue White, Black, Silver, Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Average (2.61/5) -
Drop resistance Good (C) · 90 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
89.4%
89.6%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro and Vivo iQOO 13
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Max clock 3300 MHz 4320 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
L3 cache 12 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 750 Adreno 830
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 903-1000 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~2774 GFLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro and Vivo iQOO 13
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
iQOO 13 +36%
3008
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
iQOO 13 +40%
9297
Compute Score (GPU)
17029
iQOO 13 +45%
24763
Compute Score (GPU) 17029 24763
Single-core score 2209 3008
Multi-core score 6642 9297
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
2301212
iQOO 13 +37%
3150555
CPU 662841 903944
GPU 780484 1153744
Memory 345533 415491
UX 512354 677376
Total score 2301212 3150555
Samples [33 tests] [33 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
iQOO 13 +67%
2509
Stability 82% 77%
Graphics test 11 FPS 19 FPS
Graphics score 1506 2509
3DMark Solar Bay
iQOO 13 +51%
11463
Graphics test 29 FPS 44 FPS
Section 1 32 FPS 49 FPS
Section 2 29 FPS 44 FPS
Section 3 25 FPS 37 FPS
Graphics score 7581 11463
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
6250
Graphics test - 37 FPS
Graphics score - 6250
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
16318
15763
Web score 16536 14234
Video editing 7905 6801
Photo editing 31248 39527
Data manipulation 14260 13253
Writing score 19168 20704
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (198th and 84th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-02 (fx)AnTuTu 122392357
📘 2026-09-30 (EA Fran)AnTuTu 122452758
📘 2026-09-29 -> Alejandro SorinAnTuTu 122597186
📘 2026-09-16 (Jepp)AnTuTu 122526342
📘 2026-07-05 -> Alejandro SorinAnTuTu 112301212
Vivo iQOO 13
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-02 (Fenix)AnTuTu 123392682
📘 2026-09-25 (Asuna)AnTuTu 113203192
📘 2026-09-24 (Fenix)AnTuTu 123343403
📘 2026-08-15 (Kh)AnTuTu 113166164
📘 2026-08-03 (ShiNo_Maebure)AnTuTu 113090760

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 4800 MHz 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM HyperOS 3.0 Funtouch 16
OS size 27.9 GB -
OS updates 6 years 4 years
Security updates 6 years 5 years

Battery

Capacity 6000 mAh 6150 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 120 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes No
Bypass charging No No
Fast charging Yes (50% in 16 min) Yes (91% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:37 hr 0:32 hr
Battery cycles 1000 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 13:00 hr 14:22 hr
Watching video 14:33 hr 17:57 hr
Gaming 06:14 hr 08:12 hr
Standby 141 hr 129 hr
General battery life
28:39 hr
iQOO 13 +6%
30:28 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital, 20x Optical, 2x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 24FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 1920 FPS (720p) 960 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens - 119°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.6 f/1.9
Focal length 24 mm 23 mm
Sensor OmniVision OVX8000 Sony IMX921
Sensor size 1/1.55" (≈ 0.65 inch) 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution - 50 MP
Aperture - f/1.9
Focal length - 50 mm
Sensor - Sony IMX816
Sensor size - 1/2.51" (≈ 0.4 inch)
Pixel size - 0.64 micron
Stabilization - Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 15 mm 15 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV08D Samsung S5KJN1
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 20 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 5184 x 3888 6528 x 4896
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 21 mm 28 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV20B GalaxyCore GC32E1
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 0.7 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
90.9 dB
n/a

Other

Category Mid-range Flagship
Announced March 2025 October 2024
Release date April 2025 November 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $499 $650
Successor - Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro - Vivo iQOO 15
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 120 W
Further details
Notes on iQOO 13:
    - Only the 16/512 GB variant has UFS 4.1 storage; the rest use UFS 4.0.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the camera, performance, gaming, battery life, and connectivity are more important to you, then choose the Vivo iQOO 13. But if the software and sound are more of a priority – go for the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
1 (4.5%)
21 (95.5%)
Total votes: 22

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!