Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs Realme GT 7 Pro

83 out of 100
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
VS
84 out of 100
Realme GT 7 Pro

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.67-inch Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) that was released on March 27, 2025, against the Realme GT 7 Pro, which is powered by the same chip and came out 5 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
  • Handles wireless charging up to 50W
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • 17% higher pixel density (526 vs 450 PPI)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
  • Reverse charging feature
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
Reasons to consider the Realme GT 7 Pro
  • Comes with 1200 mAh larger battery capacity: 6500 vs 5300 mAh
  • Shows 22% longer battery life (32:07 vs 26:17 hours)
  • Delivers 46% higher peak brightness (2319 against 1588 nits)
  • The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • 9% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2995 and 2753 points

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra and Realme GT 7 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
59.4
(Average)
Value Index
80.4
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.67 inches 6.78 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3200 pixels 1264 x 2780 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 526 ppi 450 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1800 nits 2000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3200 nits 6500 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz 360 Hz
Screen protection Poco Shield Glass Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Screen-to-body ratio 89.4% 88.8%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.3% 99.8%
PWM 120 Hz 120 Hz
Response time 1 ms 1 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
1588 nits
GT 7 Pro +46%
2319 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 160.26 mm (6.31 inches) 162.5 mm (6.4 inches)
Width 74.95 mm (2.95 inches) 76.9 mm (3.03 inches)
Thickness 8.39 mm (0.33 inches) 8.6 mm (0.34 inches)
Weight 212 g (7.48 oz) 222.8 g (7.86 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Yellow White, Gray, Orange
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Average (2.61/5) Good (3.59/5)
Drop resistance Average (D) Β· 45 drops Good (C) Β· 90 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
89.4%
88.8%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra and Realme GT 7 Pro
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Max clock 4320 MHz 4320 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 830 Adreno 830
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1100 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra and Realme GT 7 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
GT 7 Pro +9%
2995
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
GT 7 Pro +12%
9380
Compute Score (GPU)
GT 7 Pro +43%
24257
Compute Score (GPU) 16908 24257
Single-core score 2753 2995
Multi-core score 8410 9380
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
3060993
GT 7 Pro +2%
3125854
CPU 876139 893166
GPU 1135602 1098769
Memory 434324 443515
UX 614928 690404
Total score 3060993 3125854
Samples [10 tests] [12 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 77% -
Graphics test 16 FPS -
Graphics score 2190 -
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 38 FPS -
Section 1 43 FPS -
Section 2 39 FPS -
Section 3 33 FPS -
Graphics score 10116 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 22176 -
Video editing 8080 -
Photo editing 36202 -
Data manipulation 18123 -
Writing score 23212 -
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (104th and 90th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-12 (Andre21st)Geekbench 7 CPU2442 / 8369
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-09 (RuxeLV)Geekbench 7 GPU14153
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-09 (RuxeLV)Geekbench 7 CPU2548 / 8876
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-09 (RuxeLV)AnTuTu 123512055
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-06 (RuxeLV)AnTuTu 113193869
Realme GT 7 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-16 (Awiewizz)AnTuTu 113125854
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-26 (tei0q)AnTuTu 113315538
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-11 (Neang1201)AnTuTu 113360878
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-23 (Vladisss)AnTuTu 113111924
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-02 (Santiijago)AnTuTu 113300025

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock - 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 15
ROM HyperOS 3.0 Realme UI 6.0
OS size 33 GB 58 GB
OS updates 4 years 3 years
Security updates 6 years 4 years

Battery

Capacity 5300 mAh 6500 mAh
Max charge power 120 W 120 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) No
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) No
Bypass charging No -
Fast charging Yes (60% in 15 min) Yes (58% in 15 min)
Full charging time 0:30 hr 0:35 hr
Battery cycles 1000 cycles 800 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 11:39 hr 16:09 hr
Watching video 14:46 hr 18:28 hr
Gaming 05:50 hr 07:48 hr
Standby 124 hr 132 hr
General battery life
26:17 hr
GT 7 Pro +22%
32:07 hr
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (129th and 27th place)

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 2.5x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 24FPS Up to 24FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 1920 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 120Β° 112Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 32 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.6 f/1.9
Focal length 24 mm 24 mm
Sensor OmniVision OVX8000 Sony IMX906
Sensor size 1/1.55" (β‰ˆ 0.65 inch) 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.7
Focal length 60 mm 73 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN5 Sony IMX882
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/2" (β‰ˆ 0.5 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Optical Digital
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 32 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm 16 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KKD1 Sony IMX355
Sensor size 1/3.44" (β‰ˆ 0.29 inch) 1/2.8" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 1.14 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 16 megapixels
Image resolution 6528 x 4896 4608 x 3456
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.5
Focal length 24 mm 24 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KKD1 Sony IMX480
Sensor size 1/3.42" (β‰ˆ 0.29 inch) 1/3.09" (β‰ˆ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 1 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
89.9 dB
89.9 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced March 2025 November 2024
Release date April 2025 November 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $649 $800
Successor - Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra - Realme GT 8 Pro
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 120 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the gaming and battery life are more important to you, then choose the Realme GT 7 Pro. But if the display, connectivity, software, and sound are more of a priority – go for the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
191 (45.7%)
227 (54.3%)
Total votes: 418

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!