Xiaomi Poco F7 vs Honor 200 Pro

76 out of 100
Xiaomi Poco F7
VS
71 out of 100
Honor 200 Pro

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.83-inch Xiaomi Poco F7 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4) that was released on June 24, 2025, against the Honor 200 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 and came out 1 year and 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco F7
  • Comes with 1300 mAh larger battery capacity: 6500 vs 5200 mAh
  • Shows 25% longer battery life (26:05 vs 20:51 hours)
  • Delivers 37% higher peak brightness (1512 against 1102 nits)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
  • 33% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2263K versus 1698K)
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • The phone is 1 year and 1 month newer
Reasons to consider the Honor 200 Pro
  • The rear camera has a 2.5x optical zoom
  • Handles wireless charging up to 66W
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
  • Weighs 16.7 grams less
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Poco F7 and Honor 200 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
68*
78
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
76*
71
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
75.0
(Good)
Value Index
85.4
(Very good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.83 inches 6.78 inches
Resolution 1280 x 2772 pixels 1224 x 2700 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.85:9
PPI 447 ppi 437 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1700 nits 1200 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3200 nits 4000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz -
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 7i Aluminosilicate glass
Screen-to-body ratio 90.1% 90.8%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 100% 99.8%
PWM 240 Hz 60 Hz
Response time 1 ms 2 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
Poco F7 +37%
1512 nits
1102 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 163.1 mm (6.42 inches) 163.3 mm (6.43 inches)
Width 77.9 mm (3.07 inches) 75.2 mm (2.96 inches)
Thickness 8.2 mm (0.32 inches) 8.2 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 215.7 g (7.61 oz) 199 g (7.02 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP65
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Plastic
Colors White, Black, Silver White, Black, Blue, Pink
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Average (2.61/5) -
Drop resistance Average (D) · 45 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
90.1%
200 Pro +1%
90.8%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Poco F7 and Honor 200 Pro
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Max clock 3210 MHz 3000 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) 8 (1 + 4 + 3)
Architecture - 2 cores at 2.02 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 3 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 4 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 825 Adreno 735
GPU shading units 1024 768
GPU clock 1150 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~2355.2 GFLOPS ~1689.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Poco F7 and Honor 200 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Poco F7 +12%
2040
1820
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Poco F7 +39%
6373
4579
Compute Score (GPU)
Poco F7 +55%
13641
8821
Compute Score (GPU) 13641 8821
Single-core score 2040 1820
Multi-core score 6373 4579
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Poco F7 +33%
2263357
1698060
CPU 632157 516831
GPU 793892 495795
Memory 365292 270542
UX 472016 414892
Total score 2263357 1698060
Samples [170 tests] [16 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Poco F7 +69%
1688
998
Stability 83% 60%
Graphics test 13 FPS 7 FPS
Graphics score 1688 998
3DMark Solar Bay
Poco F7 +72%
7708
4494
Graphics test 29 FPS 17 FPS
Section 1 33 FPS 19 FPS
Section 2 30 FPS 17 FPS
Section 3 25 FPS 14 FPS
Graphics score 7708 4494
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Poco F7 +4%
15335
14677
Web score 15597 15496
Video editing 7750 7821
Photo editing 26988 29476
Data manipulation 13734 12021
Writing score 17764 16099

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Poco F7
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-06 (Dnyanesh)Geekbench 7 CPU1696 / 6351
📘 2026-10-06 (ASHOK)AnTuTu 122346502
📘 2026-09-30 (Luis)AnTuTu 122422061
📘 2026-09-29 (Thai)AnTuTu 122603535
📘 2026-09-27 (Thai)AnTuTu 122562298
Honor 200 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-08 (ChenTH)AnTuTu 111573533
📘 2026-06-07 (Dimik)AnTuTu 111768071
📘 2026-05-26 (Jason)AnTuTu 111633389
📘 2026-04-25 (Олег)AnTuTu 111801694
📘 2026-03-29 (Fenrir)AnTuTu 111421683

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 4800 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM HyperOS 3.0 MagicOS 10
OS size 44 GB 55 GB
OS updates 4 years 4 years
Security updates 6 years 5 years

Battery

Capacity 6500 mAh 5200 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 100 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No Yes (66 W)
Reverse charging Yes Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging No No
Fast charging Yes (90% in 30 min) Yes (75% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:39 hr 0:45 hr
Battery cycles 1000 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 10:24 hr 10:55 hr
Watching video 14:33 hr 08:13 hr
Gaming 07:05 hr 05:51 hr
Standby 130 hr 99 hr
General battery life
Poco F7 +25%
26:05 hr
20:51 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital Optical, 2.5x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) -
Angle of widest lens 120° 112°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.5 f/1.9
Focal length 26 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX882 OmniVision OV50H
Sensor size 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) 1/1.3" (≈ 0.77 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 1.2 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution - 50 MP
Aperture - f/2.4
Focal length - 68 mm
Sensor - Sony IMX856
Stabilization - Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm 16 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV08F -
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
n/a
138
Video quality
n/a
134
Generic main camera score
n/a
137
Bokeh - 70
Preview - 69
Zoom - 132
Samples - Photo samples of Honor 200 Pro from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 20 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 5184 x 3888 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.1
Focal length 21 mm 21 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV20B CMOS
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 0.7 micron -
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* - 20
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
89.5 dB
200 Pro +3%
91.9 dB

Other

Category Mid-range Flagship
Announced June 2025 May 2024
Release date June 2025 May 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $399 $699
Successor - - Honor 500 Pro
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 90 W Yes, 100 W
Further details
Notes on Poco F7:
    - The Indian model has a larger battery — 7550 mAh.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the display, performance, gaming, battery life, design, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Xiaomi Poco F7. But if the camera is more of a priority – go for the Honor 200 Pro.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
28 (62.2%)
17 (37.8%)
Total votes: 45

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!