Xiaomi Poco X6 vs Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

54 out of 100
Xiaomi Poco X6
VS
73 out of 100
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.67-inch Xiaomi Poco X6 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2) that was released on January 11, 2024, against the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, which is powered by Exynos 2400e and came out 9 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco X6
  • Supports higher wattage charging (67W versus 25W)
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • 16% higher pixel density (446 vs 385 PPI)
  • Weighs 32 grams less
  • Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
  • 2.6x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1977K versus 754K)
  • The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
  • Shows 24% longer battery life (23:02 vs 18:31 hours)
  • Handles wireless charging up to 15W
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
  • Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Poco X6 and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
20.6
(Mediocre)
Value Index
65.9
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED Dynamic AMOLED
Size 6.67 inches 6.7 inches
Resolution 1220 x 2712 pixels 1080 x 2340 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
PPI 446 ppi 385 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (30-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1200 nits 1300 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 1800 nits 1900 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 240 Hz -
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus Gorilla Glass Victus Plus
Screen-to-body ratio 89.8% 88%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space - 100%
PWM - 120 Hz
Response time - 2 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
1336 nits
1372 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 161.15 mm (6.34 inches) 162 mm (6.38 inches)
Width 74.24 mm (2.92 inches) 77.3 mm (3.04 inches)
Thickness 7.98 mm (0.31 inches) 8 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 181 g (6.38 oz) 213 g (7.51 oz)
Waterproof IP54 IP68
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Plastic Glass
Frame material Plastic Metal
Colors White, Black, Blue Black, Gray, Blue, Green, Yellow
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.11/5)
Drop resistance - Excellent (A) · 270 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
Poco X6 +2%
89.8%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Poco X6 and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 Samsung Exynos 2400e
Max clock 2400 MHz 3110 MHz
CPU cores 8 (4 + 4) 10 (1 + 2 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A78
- 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 2 cores at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.11 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache - 8 MB
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
GPU
Graphics Adreno 710 Xclipse 940
GPU shading units 256 768
GPU clock 940 MHz 1095 MHz
FLOPS ~481.3 GFLOPS ~3406.8 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Poco X6 and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
1015
2045
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
2687
6397
Compute Score (GPU)
1767
16611
Compute Score (GPU) 1767 16611
Single-core score 1015 2045
Multi-core score 2687 6397
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
754967
1977269
CPU 294102 675682
GPU 72707 670589
Memory 146220 229976
UX 241938 401022
Total score 754967 1977269
Samples [15 tests] [55 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
252
1769
Stability 98% 70%
Graphics test 2 FPS 13 FPS
Graphics score 252 1769
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test - 29 FPS
Section 1 - 35 FPS
Section 2 - 28 FPS
Section 3 - 24 FPS
Graphics score - 7699
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
12420
16227
Web score 11685 15997
Video editing 7141 8031
Photo editing 23891 33878
Data manipulation 10182 12347
Writing score 14783 19836

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Poco X6
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-06-12 (Roshan)Geekbench 6 CPU1021 / 2953
📘 2026-06-12 (Roshan)AnTuTu 11788172
📘 2026-05-04 -> SparxieAnTuTu 11906684
📘 2026-05-03 (Tera papa 🫵🏻😆)AnTuTu 11755685
📘 2026-04-26 (Dauren)AnTuTu 11762979
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-12 -> bo177575AnTuTu 122370118
📘 2026-10-12 (Abs)AnTuTu 112053895
📘 2026-09-21 (Vishnu)AnTuTu 122276561
📘 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShCPU Throttle81%
📘 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShAnTuTu 122134029

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 2133 MHz 4200 MHz
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM HyperOS 3 One UI 8.0
OS size - 23.5 GB
OS updates 2 years 4 years
Security updates 2 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 5100 mAh 4700 mAh
Max charge power 67 W 25 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No Yes (15 W)
Reverse charging No Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging - No
Fast charging Yes (78% in 30 min) Yes (56% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:48 hr 1:10 hr
Battery cycles - 2000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 06:45 hr 07:20 hr
Watching video 10:18 hr 13:33 hr
Gaming 04:35 hr 05:11 hr
Standby 99 hr 129 hr
General battery life
18:31 hr
23:02 hr

Main camera

Matrix 64 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 9000 x 7000 8160 x 6120
Zoom Digital Optical, 3x
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 120FPS
Slow motion 120 FPS (720p) 960 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 120° 123°
Lenses 1) Standard: 64 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
3) Macro: 2 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 8 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 64 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.8
Focal length 25 mm 24 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV64B Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN3
Sensor size 1/2" (≈ 0.5 inch) 1/1.57" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution - 8 MP
Aperture - f/2.4
Focal length - 75 mm
Sensor - OmniVision OV08A10
Sensor size - 1/4.4" (≈ 0.23 inch)
Pixel size - 1 micron
Stabilization - Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length - 13 mm
Sensor Sony IMX355 Samsung S5K3L6
Sensor size 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) 1/3.0" (≈ 0.33 inch)
Pixel size 1.14 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution 2 MP -
Aperture f/2.4 -
Sensor Omnivision OV02B10 -
Sensor size 1/5" (≈ 0.2 inch) -
Pixel size 1.75 micron -
Stabilization Digital -

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh - 60
Preview - 69
Zoom - 126
Samples - Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S24 FE from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Image resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.4
Focal length - 26 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV16A1Q Samsung S5K3J1
Sensor size 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch) 1/2.65" (≈ 0.38 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1.22 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.2 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort - Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* 18 20
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack Yes No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
n/a
91.9 dB

Other

Category Mid-range Flagship
Announced January 2024 September 2024
Release date January 2024 October 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $249 $649
Successor - Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro - Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
SAR (head) - 0.86 W/kg
SAR (body) - 1.29 W/kg
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 67 W Not included
Further details
Notes on Galaxy S24 FE:
    - The 128 GB variant features UFS 3.1 memory, other models have UFS 4.0.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
2 (25%)
6 (75%)
Total votes: 8

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!