Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro vs Honor 400 Pro

73 out of 100
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
VS
80 out of 100
Honor 400 Pro

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.67-inch Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra) that was released on January 9, 2025, against the Honor 400 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and came out 4 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Comes with 700 mAh larger battery capacity: 6000 vs 5300 mAh
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
Reasons to consider the Honor 400 Pro
  • The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
  • Shows 7% longer battery life (24:36 vs 23:02 hours)
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Handles wireless charging up to 50W
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • 16% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2243K versus 1930K)
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • Delivers 17% higher peak brightness (1472 against 1253 nits)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro and Honor 400 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
107.5
(Excellent)
Value Index
48.3
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.67 inches 6.7 inches
Resolution 1220 x 2712 pixels 1280 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
PPI 446 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1400 nits 1500 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3200 nits 5000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz -
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 7i Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 88.8% 90%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.6% -
PWM 120 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto)
1253 nits
400 Pro +17%
1472 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 160.75 mm (6.33 inches) 160.8 mm (6.33 inches)
Width 75.24 mm (2.96 inches) 76.1 mm (3 inches)
Thickness 8.29 mm (0.33 inches) 8.1 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 195 g (6.88 oz) 205 g (7.23 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Plastic Glass
Frame material Plastic Plastic
Colors Black, Green, Yellow Black, Gray, Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.61/5)
Drop resistance - Excellent (A) · 270 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
88.8%
400 Pro +1%
90%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro and Honor 400 Pro
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Max clock 3250 MHz 3000 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.1 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 6 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 880 Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Mali-G720 MC7 Adreno 750
GPU shading units 896 1536
GPU clock 1300 MHz 903-1000 MHz
FLOPS ~2329.6 GFLOPS ~2774 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro and Honor 400 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
400 Pro +34%
2109
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
400 Pro +10%
6695
Compute Score (GPU)
12162
400 Pro +18%
14352
Compute Score (GPU) 12162 14352
Single-core score 1573 2109
Multi-core score 6102 6695
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
1930851
400 Pro +16%
2243804
CPU 621813 702885
GPU 602568 723128
Memory 295421 332058
UX 411049 485733
Total score 1930851 2243804
Samples [212 tests] [24 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
400 Pro +16%
1492
Stability 80% 75%
Graphics test 10 FPS 11 FPS
Graphics score 1285 1492
3DMark Solar Bay
400 Pro +27%
7535
Graphics test 23 FPS 29 FPS
Section 1 24 FPS 32 FPS
Section 2 23 FPS 29 FPS
Section 3 20 FPS 25 FPS
Graphics score 5931 7535
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
13994
400 Pro +15%
16036
Web score 14924 17920
Video editing 6707 7685
Photo editing 23231 29553
Data manipulation 12242 14371
Writing score 18327 17125

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-12 (ASAZALI3005)AnTuTu 122147378
📘 2026-10-11 (Sn1per)AnTuTu 122150690
📘 2026-10-05 (Muhamad Rosyid (indonesia))AnTuTu 122280224
📘 2026-10-04 -> Timur55AnTuTu 111910022
📘 2026-10-01 -> Mohammad.SodaeiAnTuTu 122257137
Honor 400 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-09 (Lunka)AnTuTu 112094129
📘 2026-09-01 (Maska)AnTuTu 112163688
📘 2026-07-07 -> naufallAnTuTu 112162598
📘 2026-06-28 (f0NES1k)AnTuTu 112306681
📘 2026-06-10 (Zhan)AnTuTu 112206753

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory clock 4200 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM HyperOS 3.0 MagicOS 10
OS updates 3 years 6 years
Security updates 4 years 6 years

Battery

Capacity 6000 mAh 5300 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 100 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No Yes (50 W)
Reverse charging Yes Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging No Yes
Fast charging Yes (50% in 17 min) Yes (93% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:42 hr 0:38 hr
Battery cycles - 1200 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 10:29 hr 10:11 hr
Watching video 15:22 hr 14:23 hr
Gaming 05:54 hr 06:01 hr
Standby 93 hr 118 hr
General battery life
23:02 hr
400 Pro +7%
24:36 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 200 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 16384 x 12288
Zoom Digital Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) -
Angle of widest lens - 112°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
4) Depth: 2 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/1.5 f/1.9
Focal length 26 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX882 Samsung ISOCELL HP3
Sensor size 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.56 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution - 50 MP
Aperture - f/2.4
Focal length - 68 mm
Sensor - Sony IMX856
Sensor size - 1/2" (≈ 0.5 inch)
Pixel size - 0.8 micron
Stabilization - Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm 16 mm
Sensor Smartsens SC820CS -
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 20 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 5184 x 3888 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.1
Focal length 21 mm -
Sensor Omnivision OV20B -
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 0.7 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Depends on the region Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
91.5 dB
n/a

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced January 2025 May 2025
Release date January 2025 May 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $299 $799
Successor - Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max - Honor 500 Pro
SAR (head) 0.99 W/kg -
SAR (body) 0.99 W/kg -
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 100 W
Further details
Notes on Poco X7 Pro:
    - The eco-leather version is thicker at 8.43 mm and weighs 198 grams.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Honor 400 Pro is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
51 (46.4%)
59 (53.6%)
Total votes: 110

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!