Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro vs Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.67-inch Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra) that was released on January 9, 2025, against the Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate and came out 2 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
12 / 256 GB

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
  • Shows 23% longer battery life (23:02 vs 18:43 hours)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
  • Comes with 800 mAh larger battery capacity: 6000 vs 5200 mAh
  • Delivers 21% higher peak brightness (1266 against 1050 nits)
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • 13% higher pixel density (446 vs 393 PPI)
  • 29% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1573 and 1216 points
Reasons to consider the Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G
  • The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Handles wireless charging up to 50W
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro and Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
107.5
(Excellent)
Value Index
45.7
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.67 inches 6.78 inches
Resolution 1220 x 2712 pixels 1080 x 2436 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 -
PPI 446 ppi 393 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes
Max rated brightness 1400 nits 1300 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3200 nits -
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision -
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz -
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 7i Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 88.8% 90.3%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.6% -
PWM 120 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto)
1266 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 160.75 mm (6.33 inches) 163.36 mm (6.43 inches)
Width 75.24 mm (2.96 inches) 74.53 mm (2.93 inches)
Thickness 8.29 mm (0.33 inches) 7.99 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 195 g (6.88 oz) 209 g (7.37 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP64
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber -
Rear material Plastic Glass
Frame material Plastic Metal
Colors Black, Green, Yellow Gray, Purple
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro and Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate
Max clock 3250 MHz 3350 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.1 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A510
- 3 cores at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-A715
- 1 core at 3.35 GHz: Cortex-A715
L3 cache 6 MB 4 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 880 MediaTek APU 780
GPU
Graphics Mali-G720 MC7 Mali-G615 MP6
GPU shading units 896 768
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1400 MHz
FLOPS ~2329.6 GFLOPS ~2150.4 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro and Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 12162 -
Single-core score 1573 1216
Multi-core score 6102 3896
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
1930851
CPU 621813 507744
GPU 602568 490070
Memory 295421 324889
UX 411049 452942
Total score 1930851 1775645
Samples [212 tests] [7 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 80% 75%
Graphics test 10 FPS 9 FPS
Graphics score 1285 1188
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 23 FPS 18 FPS
Section 1 24 FPS 19 FPS
Section 2 23 FPS 18 FPS
Section 3 20 FPS 16 FPS
Graphics score 5931 4757
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 14924 -
Video editing 6707 -
Photo editing 23231 -
Data manipulation 12242 -
Writing score 18327 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-12 (ASAZALI3005)AnTuTu 122147378
📘 2026-10-11 (Sn1per)AnTuTu 122150690
📘 2026-10-05 (Muhamad Rosyid (indonesia))AnTuTu 122280224
📘 2026-10-04 -> Timur55AnTuTu 111910022
📘 2026-10-01 -> Mohammad.SodaeiAnTuTu 122257137
Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-06-27 (Kiffy)AnTuTu 111523757
📘 2026-05-25 (DINO)AnTuTu 111775645
📘 2026-02-17 (Gilomes)AnTuTu 111833335
📘 2026-02-17 (Gilomes)AnTuTu 111768191
📘 2026-01-17 (Misael)AnTuTu 111809456

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 4200 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 15
ROM HyperOS 3.0 XOS 15
OS updates 3 years 2 years
Security updates 4 years 3 years

Battery

Capacity 6000 mAh 5200 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 100 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No Yes
Wireless charging No Yes (50 W)
Reverse charging Yes Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging No -
Fast charging Yes (50% in 17 min) Yes (86% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:42 hr 0:37 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 10:29 hr 09:06 hr
Watching video 15:22 hr 12:33 hr
Gaming 05:54 hr 05:09 hr
Standby 93 hr 69 hr
General battery life
23:02 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 -
Zoom Digital Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) -
Angle of widest lens - 112°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.5 f/1.9
Focal length 26 mm 24 mm
Sensor Sony IMX882 Sony IMX896
Sensor size 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution - 50 MP
Aperture - f/2.4
Focal length - 70 mm
Sensor - Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN5
Sensor size - 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size - 0.64 micron
Stabilization - Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm 15 mm
Sensor Smartsens SC820CS GalaxyCore GC32E1
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 20 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 5184 x 3888 -
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 21 mm 21 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV20B GalaxyCore GC08A8
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 1.12 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Depends on the region Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No Yes
Dolby Atmos Yes -
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced January 2025 March 2025
Release date January 2025 April 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $299 $390
Successor - Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max -
SAR (head) 0.99 W/kg -
SAR (body) 0.99 W/kg -
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 100 W
Further details
Notes on Poco X7 Pro:
    - The eco-leather version is thicker at 8.43 mm and weighs 198 grams.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
287 (68.3%)
133 (31.7%)
Total votes: 420

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
AizenSosuke. May 26, 2025 at 04:09 AM
Poco always win, it's so good for its price
+3 Reply
Avatar
alzamot April 30, 2025 at 07:08 AM
Poco x7 pro is just better for its price
+2 Reply
Avatar
Anonymous April 26, 2025 at 03:37 AM
Is the 2 major OS support of the Infinix really worth the better camera it has than the Poco?
+20 Reply
Avatar
Samsudin April 25, 2025 at 03:22 AM
Poco is the relly better
+2 Reply